Lecture 8 - Beliefs and attitudes 1 Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What is a belief?

A

What you think about how the world is and how it should be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an attitude?

A

How you react/behave in response to certain stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are attitudes more specific than personality traits?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Broadly, what two things characterise conservatives’ highly active defensive systems?

A

Anxiety/fear
Disgust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Broadly, what two things characterise liberals’ open-mindedness?

A

Oriented to reward
More Intelligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the most predictive association between political orientation and attitudes?

A

Conservatives feel threatened/disgusted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is anxiety/fear evolved to protect us against?

A

Predators or large agents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is disgust evolved to protect us against?

A

Small organisms and microbes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are conservatives’ defensive systems more easily aroused than others?

A

Yes, they feel more threatened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which of Gray’s systems is more active in liberals?

A

Gray’s BAS - appetitive/approach oriented

Less anxious/neurotic and less prone to disgust
More sensation seeking and excited by novelty
Less need for cognitive closure and lower conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which of Gray’s systems is more active in conservatives?

A

Gray’s BIS - aversive oriented

More anxious and neurotic, more prone to disgust
Less sensation seeking and suspicious of novelty
Intolerant of ambiguity
Higher need for cognitive closure and higher conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can evolution explain conservative ideology?

A

The human brain evolved in prehistory, before strong social inequalities. (Lack of large groups)

Dawn of agriculture (~12,000 years ago) enabled extra inequality, by creating food/resource surplus, divisions of labour, and perpetuating generational differences.

Progress towards equality seems to be impeded by conservative attitudes

These conservative attitudes rest on powerful predispositions from defensive systems inherited from our evolutionary past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What personality type did Adorno identify? What questionnaire did he make?

A

Authoritarian personality - person supporting fascist regimes
- Influenced by harsh parenting and socioeconomic context
- Fear and aggression predicted conservatism

California F scale (f for fascism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are nazi beliefs targeted by the F scale?

A

Weak vs strong people, a few strong leaders: Nietzsche as read by Hitler
Beliefs in the occult and supernatural
Many conspiracy theories today have roots in far-right ideologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were Altemeyer’s criticisms of the F scale?

A

Old-fashioned, insufficiently captures modern political attitudes

Does not distinguish between right and left authoritarianism -
- control of free speech
- wealth redistribution
- i.e. Stalinist USSR vs Nazi Germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What scale did Altemeyer create?

A

RWA - right wing authoritarianism

17
Q

What are the two aspects of Altemeyer’s model of RWA?

A

Personality and cognitive ability

Personality:
- Punitive attitudes
- Prejudiced
- Fearful

Cognitive ability:
- Dogmatic
- Accept insufficient evidence to support their beliefs

18
Q

Meloen et al. (1996) found that the various scales of RWA strongly predict…

A

Right-wing social/political stances, e.g. apartheid, anti-semitism, isolating AIDS victims

19
Q

Meloen et al. (1996) found that the various scales of RWA moderately predict…

A

Sympathy for right-wing political parties (strongest prediction for the Racist political party)

20
Q

What improvements were made by Zakrisson (2005) in a new 15 item version of RWA scale?

A

Reasonable internal consistency
Predicts ‘modern racism’ and ‘modern sexism’ in Sweden

21
Q

Other than RWA scales, what else can measure political orientation?

A

Single question -

Single-item measure where participants self-report their political orientation as
‘Very Liberal’ (1),
‘Liberal’ (2),
‘Middle of the road’ (3),
‘Conservative (4), or
‘Very Conservative’ (5)

22
Q

Jost et al. (2003) conducted a meta-analysis of psychological variables that predict political conservatism - what were significant positive correlations?

A

Political conservatism is positively correlated with:

Dogmatism and Intolerance of ambiguity
e.g. If doing a task with a familiar strategy conservatives are more likely to stick with it than use a new one

Need for order and Need for cognitive closure

23
Q

Jost et al. (2003) conducted a meta-analysis of psychological variables that predict political conservatism - what task were conservatives worse at?

A

Conservatives worse at integrative complexity - complex tasks that require the integration of information

24
Q

Jost et al. (2003) conducted a meta-analysis of psychological variables that predict political conservatism - what were significant negative correlations?

A

General sensation seeking
Valuing imaginativeness
Openness to experience

Also negatively correlated with self-esteem but with a much smaller effect

25
Were right or left wingers more aroused by appetitive or aversive images? (Dodd et al., 2012)
Right wingers more aroused by aversive images Left wingers more aroused by appetitive images Measured by skin conductance change Aversive = something that evokes disgust Appetitive = food or sex
26
Oxley et al (2008) measured people's political orientation with qs from the Wilson-Patterson format Level of Support for Protective Policies. He then tested responses to threatening stimuli. What were results from skin conductance reactivity to visual threat and blink amplitude in response to startling stimuli?
Low support = liberal (against protective policies like military spending, death penalty etc) High support = conservative (against immigration, gun control etc) Low = no difference in skin conductance reactivity to threatening and non-threatening visual stimuli High = much bigger reaction to visually threatening stimuli Low = lower mean blink amplitude to startling sounds High = higher blink amplitude to startling sounds
27
In Inbar, Pizarro and Bloom (2008) - what did disgust predict?
Being against gay marriage, abortion and tax cuts
28
Smith et al. (2011) measured physiological responses to disgusting images. What were characteristics of people who had a strong physiological response to disgusting images?
more likely to rate themselves as politically conservative more likely to be against gay marriage
29
What does body odour disgust predict and what is this mediated by? (Liuzza et al., 2018)
Predicts authoritarian attitudes (attitudes towards Trump), mediated by RWA
30
What could fMRI based multi-regional response to images of animal carcasses predict? (Ahn et al., 2014)
Political views Different patterns of activation across the whole brain
31
What different cognitive styles are shown by liberals and conservatives?
C = more structured and persistent cognitive styles L = more responsive to informational complexity, ambiguity and novelty
32
Amodio et al focused on ‘conflict monitoring’ - what is this?
A general mechanism for detecting when one’s Habitual response tendency is mismatched with responses required by the current situation” E.g. you need to override a pre-existing or otherwise powerful response ‘response override’
33
Amodio et al looked at EEG responses in a Go/Nogo task (not political at all) - what did the task involve?
Participants should quickly respond to frequently-presented Go stimulus e.g. press button when you hear a high tone This response (through repetition) becomes ‘habitual’, ‘prepotent’ However, on a few trials the Nogo stimulus (e.g. low tone) is presented. The participant should withhold this habitual response: ‘response override’ The participant should not press the button
34
Amodio et al looked at EEG responses in a Go/Nogo task (not political at all) - what did the EEG show?
Studied two ERPs a) Error-related negativity - very clear negative activity peak after the wrong response to Nogo trials (failed inhibition) (timelocked to response) Peaks ~50ms after an incorrect response b) Nogo N2 (timelocked to stimulus) Peaks ~200ms after Nogo stimulus
35
Amodio et al looked at EEG responses in a Go/Nogo task (not political at all) - what did error-related negativity (ERN) show about political orientation?
The larger your ERN, the more liberal you are and the greater your accuracy on Nogo trials The Anterior Cingulate is the source of the ERN The larger your Nogo N2, the more liberal you are Realise error has been made and update the strategy - more in liberals Liberals show stronger brain reactivity to cues signalling a need to change a prepotent response pattern. This brain reactivity was centred on the Anterior Cingulate. This presumably explains liberals’ better performance on the task, though brain activity predicts political preference better than task response accuracy.
36
Kanai et al. (2011) (incl. Colin Firth) conducted a study into political orientations and brain structure. What did they find about the anterior cingulate cortex and right amygdala?
The larger your anterior cingulate, the more liberal you are The larger you right amygdala, the more conservative you are Also - a positive correlation between conservatism and insula volume (insula involved in taste and disgust) Using a learning (‘leave one out’) algorithm trained on this sample, you can infer the poles (extreme ends, 1 vs 4) quite well. Algorithm can deduce if someone from this sample is ‘Very liberal’ (1) or ‘Conservative’ (4) with 71.6% accuracy.