Lecture 9 Flashcards

Attention & Performance: controlled processing (38 cards)

1
Q

perfomance

A

the efficiency and effectiveness of behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

attention is selective

A

acts like a filter
acts like a spotlight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

focused attention

A

when we are presented with two more stimuli, but we attend to or respond to only one of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

attention is a mental resource

A

is a single limited resource
is multiple resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

divided attention

A

multi-tasking, when we are presented with multiple stimuli we attend and respond to all of them, as long as we don’t exceed our available resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

resource theories

A

attention is a mental resource, we divide our energy to attend to different stimuli in the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

multi-tasking

A

responding to all presented stimuli
e.g. driving a car, listening to the radio, changing gears, drinking a coffee and talking on the phone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

controlled processing

A

tasks that require mental effort
such as reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

automatic processing

A

tasks don’t require much energy
such as eating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dual-tasks have costs

A

when doing more than one task, our mental resources are split
fewer resources are available meaning the tasks are performed slower and less efficiently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

failure to allocate appropriate amounts of resources to a task can have serious consequences

A

80% of all crashes and 65% of all near crashes involved the driver looking away from the forward roadway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

dual-tasks has benefits

A

allows us to get things done in a fairly coherent and uninterrupted way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

studying dual-tasks in the lab

A

first participants perform a single task and they are measured on how well they do at it
then participants will perform a second task and they are measured on how well they perform
finally, participants perform both tasks at the same time and are measured on how well they do at it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

typical findings of dual-task studies

A

decrease in performance between participants when they do the single task vs the dual task
this is known as dual-task cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

spoon theory

A

wake up with 12 spoons, each activity you complete you spend a spoon
you cant complete 2 tasks if mental resources have been exceeded
as a result the tasks will performed much slower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

attention as a pool of capacity

A

we can do two things at once successfully, if the demands of the two tasks don’t exceed the capacity of the resource
if the two tasks are within the capacity limits, there is no performance decrease when doing the tasks at the same time
if the demands of the two tasks exceed the available capacity, interference between the tasks will occur as they battle for resources, leading to slower responding

17
Q

central resource capacity theory

A

Kahneman 1973
there’s a single resource of attention with flexible capacity limits that all tasks compete for
arousal and motivation determine our capacity limits
difficult tasks use more of the attentional capacity that easy task, and create more interference
therefore difficulty effects dual-task performance

18
Q

Bourke et al 1996 Method

A

participant undertook 4 tasks in different combinations, either as single or dual tasks
- tone discrimination
- random letter generation
- motor task
- visual recognition taks

19
Q

Bourke et al 1996 Results

A

the tasks interfered with each other in differing degrees
- greatest interference was with the letter generation
- least interference was with the tone discrimination task

20
Q

Multiple resource theory

A

Wickens 1992
there are many different resource pool, each having their own resource capacity
dual task performance is determined by similarity of the two tasks at different levels
- input modality similarity
- output modality similarity
- processing stage similarity

21
Q

input modality similarity

A

both tasks require vision, or hearing

22
Q

output modality similarity

A

both tasks require verbal response

23
Q

processing stage similarity

A

both tasks require comprehension

24
Q

evidence support for MRT
input modality similarity

A

Treinman and Davies 1973
participants monitored information coming from visual and/or auditory modalities
- a single stream
- two visual streams
- two auditory streams
- one visual and one auditory system

performance was best in single stream information and worse when information was monitored from the same input channels

25
evidence support for MRT processing stage similarity
Brooks 1968 participants memorised a sentence at the same time, they had to say whether a word heard from headphones was a noun, either by verbally responding or manually pointing verbal responses were much harder, because holding a sentence in memory and making a verbal response both use verbal attention and tax the same task-specific resource
26
evidence support for MRT output modality similarity
Mcleod 1977 participants carried out two task concurrently, a tracking and tone identification task in one conditions the tasks requited manual responses and the other condition one task required manual and the other verbal response performance was worse in the first condition, suggesting interferences only occur when the tasks share the same resource pools
27
evidence against MRT cross-modal interference
different pools of attention aren't completely separate cross modal studies ask people to do two things at once, such as watching the road and following a conversation
28
Strayer and Johnston 2001 cross-modal interference
simulated a driving task with or without a mobile phone difficult driving conditions with high density traffic easy driving conditions with low density traffic they measured the number of red lights missed and the breaking speed participants missed more red lights when engaged in a mobile phone conversation participants were slower to press the brake button when engaged in mobile phone conversations
29
Driver and Spence 1994
shadow words from one of the speakers and observe a person uttering the words if in the same location performance was better in different locations perforce was worse even of there is some devision between modalities these results show that different pools of attention are not completely independent
30
central capacity theory evaluation
task difficulty influences dual task performance there is a central resource that different tasks use and as long as they don't exceed the capacity there will be no interference but it cannot account for the effects of task similarity some tasks can be done together and other cannot
31
multiple resource theory evaluation
accounts for many dual task findings monitoring two visual inputs is more difficult that monitoring a visual and auditory input however, cannot account of evidence that shows interference between tow task requiring different pools of resources
32
criticisms of he resource theories
theories of dual task performance not necessarily attention poor control over timing of the tasks raises possibility that people switched their attention possibility of too man and too specific resources don't explain the why, how and what of attentional selection theories of performance rather than attention
33
attention is determined by
difficulty of one or both of the tasks similarity between the two tasks at the level of input modality, output modality, processing style
34
the reason attention is difficult
we have a single limited pool of mental resources or we have mulitoppe pools of mental resources that aren't entirely independent but correspond to our senses
35
early theories
central resource pool performance determined by task difficulty attention is a single limited capacity resource it can be divided and assigned arbitrarily to different task, depending on how much one needs
36
later theories
multiple resource pool dual task performance is determined by task similarity there are multiple task specific attentional capacities
37
latest theories
different resource pools not entirely independent based of studies that looks at driving
38
perfomance in dual task codlins is determined by
task difficulty task similarity practise and the type of processing