Lectures M2-Final Flashcards
(229 cards)
Optimal fat reserves
for animals
- Animals must maintain short-term and long-term fat reserves
Benefits of fat reserves: insurance, insulation
Costs of fat reserves: weight, increased energy expenditure, reduced mobility → increased predation risk
- Animals show adaptive fat storage (must optimally balance fat reserves, which is a cost)
- Winter in higher latitudes = longer nights, lower temperature, higher variance + uncertainty
Fat reserves in humans
- Sufficient energy for over 50 days!
> 60% of the brain (myelin is mostly fat)
10-20% in men
15-25% in women
When do animals store more fat
- animals in higher latitudes would store more fat in the winter than in either fall or spring
- animals that experience more interruptions would store more fat
4 considerations when determining what an animal should eat
- encounter rate
- energy content
- handling time
- predation risk
Encounter rate
of items encountered per unit time
Handling time
time from capture to complete ingestion
e.g. takes time to feed, access, sit in the flower, etc.
Should the grizzly eat the whole fish or just brain and eggs (richest in calories)?
Answer: it depends:
- Assume that prey 1 (brain) and prey 2 (fish body) have the same encounter rate
- Prey 1 has about twice the energy content than prey 2
- If the encounter rate with prey 1 is sufficiently high, avoid prey 2
The optimal diet model
depends on (3 things)
a simple mathematical model that allows us to predict what prey types a forager should eat based on the energy content, encounter rate, and handling time of each type
2 key predictions of the optimal diet model
- If the encounter rate with the most profitable prey (prey 1) is above a threshold level, only this prey should be eaten
- The encounter rate with prey 2 should not affect the decision whether to feed on prey 2
A test of the optimal diet model with great tits
mealworm density
Presented mealworms at varying density and encounter rate
Prediction:
- At low prey densities, both types should be eaten
- At high prey densities, even when the large prey is less common than the small prey (0.3:0.7), only the large prey should be eaten
Result:
- pretty much that except some small prey were still taken
The optimal patch (of food) residence time
- A forager should stay in the current patch until its rate of intake is equal to the average rate of intake in other patches
- A forager should stay longer in a patch if the travel time between patches is longer
Travel time great tits experiments
- became more difficult to find more mealworms the more they caught them
- greater travel time increased duration in the patch
same as predictions
Simple mathematical models predict… (3 things)
all related to food
- what food types animals should choose,
- where they should forage, and
- how long they should feed in a patch before moving on to another patch
The moose dilemma + solution
dilemma: balancing (i) energy-rich, sodium-poor terrestrial plants and (ii) sodium-rich, energy-poor aquatic plants
The moose solution: such a model predicts that a moose should spend ~18% of its foraging time on the sodium-rich, energy-poor aquatic plants (approximately what moose do)
The central challenge for most animals is staying alive
predation
Predators to humans
Few large predators: bear, mountain lions
Large animals: bison, elk
Venomous animals: snapes, etc.
3 adaptations by humans that reduce their probability of being hit by cars
like predator avoidance
- avoidance in space
- avoidance in time
- inspection/vigilance
Analogy is imperfect because, unlike predators, car drivers do not attempt to hit pedestrians
Predator-prey arms race: vervet monkeys and crown eagles
- monkeys stay away from exposed tree tops
→ eagles fly among trees
→ monkeys have a special eagle alarm call and attempt to drop to dense bushes
→ eagle has short wings, which helps if it has to plunge through the canopy
Prey has evolved good counter adaptations
Balancing courtship and antipredatory behaviour: tree frogs
tree frog males use their call to attract females, but this might instead attract a bat predator and biting flies that transmit disease
Balancing feeding and antipredatory behaviour - 2 key questions
Food and patch choice: should an animal prefer lesser quality food at a safer place?
What is the optimal amount of fat?
- feed or scan
- keep feeding or flee
- stay in shelter or resume feeding
Balancing feeding and anti predatory behaviour - ants example
Ants could choose between two patches containing liquid ant diet of different concentrations. The high concentration patch was either safe or had a predator
Ants preferred the safer, less rewarding patch as long as:
- it was not much worse (as low as ~ 8 times worse concentration)
- the predator remained active
Horse sensitivity to weight
Horse racing: must calculate the exact weight they must put on a horse to equalise horses
0.3% of horse weight (1.5 kg) would cause a ½ body length speed reduction
Great tits optimal body fat
predation
- added weight decreases ascent angle
- can’t evade predation
- aviaries with more protection = fatter birds
- more fat in years with no predators
- More fat when food is less certain
- Less fat when predation risk is higher
Optimal egg hatching choice in red-eyed tree frogs
the over water hatching thing
- respond to vibrations signalling predation by dropping into the water
The leaves are associated with terrestrial predators (snakes and wasps), the water has aquatic predators (shrimp and fish)
strongly prefer to hatch @ 7 days night
if certain of terrestrial predation, hatch days 5/6
otherwise hatch days 7–11