Left and Right Realist explanations of crime and deviance Flashcards
(13 cards)
What are the right wing characteristics?
- Focus on individual achievement
- Equality is not possible or desirable
- People get what they deserve- incentivise the talented
- State should not intervene
- Individuals make bad choices, poor socialisation, wrong norms
- Blame the criminal/deviant
- Tough penalties and strict control-
- Functionalist, new right, right realist
What are the right realist explanations of crime?
- Biological inclination/the underclass
- Opportunity theory
- Changes to society
- Broken windows theory
How do Wilson and Herrnstein explain crime?
Right
- There is a biological element to criminality
- Criminal traits are heightened if the individual lacks proper socialisation
- In the nuclear family- criminal traits are suppressed as right norms and values are taught
- In single-parent families- criminal traits are heightened due to inadequate socialisation
(Links to Murray’s views on the underclass)
How does Wilson explain crime?
Right
- Long term trends in crime can be accounted for by 3 primary factors:
1) Shifts in the age structure of the population will increase/decrease the crime rate (young males- most likely to commit)
2) Changes in costs/benefits of crime at different times, due to accessibility, the economy, job availability
3) Broad social/cultural changes in society (influence norms and values- affect the extent to which ‘at risk’ individuals are tempted into crime)
How do Wilson and Kelling explain crime?
Right
- Community will change its behaviour in the face of low-level disorder
- Broken windows theory- when people identify a building as derelict and uncared for, they will view it as acceptable to vandalise
- Zimbardo’s study- left an abandoned care in a middle class area (1) and a run-down area (2)- 2 was immediately vandalised, 2 was left alone, until he smashed one window- this encouraged the car to be destroyed
What are the left wing characteristics?
Focus on power/inequality
- Bottom= victims of circumstances
- State should intervene to share out wealth
- Inequality leads to crime
- The system is to blame
- Law is not equally applied
- Marxist, interactionists, radical criminology, left realist
What are the left realist causes of crime?
- Relative deprivation
- Mariginalisation
- Subculture
How do Lea and Young explain relative deprivation?
Left
- Relative deprivation- feelings of deprivation that arises when an individual compares themselves to others, fuelled by the media
- Young- we live in a bulimic society where we are encouraged to worship status, money, wealth and success- those who face relative deprivation cannot do so
- Turn to illegeal means to achieve consumerist goals- i.e. theft, drug dealing
How do Lea and Young explain marginalisation?
Left
- Marginalisation- those on the edges of society, who lack clearly defined goals, involvement and representation within society
- Hutton- 40:30:30 society- 40% employed, 30% insecure employment, 30% marginalised
- Young- economic exclusion leads to social exclusion, the breakdown of communities and families, and an increase in crime and deviance
How do Lea and Young explain subculture?
Left
- Subculture- groups of individuals with shared norms and values
- Formed by individuals who cannot achieve society’s norms and values
- Occurs in response to relative deprivation and marginalisation
- Influenced by sucbultural theories- Merton’s strain theory- individuals face blocked opportunities, so turn to illegal means to achieve societal goals
How do Matthews and Young explain crime?
Left
- The square of crime
- Focus on the relationship between: the offender, the victim, the public, the criminal justice system
- Police and public trust influence crime levels
Right realism evaluation
- Too harsh- blames the individual for crime (Left realism)
- Ignores social inequality (Left realism)
- Ignores the role of social structures (Marxism)
- Plays down the causes of offending (instead focuses on failure in social control/punishment)- Young= deviance and control cannot be studied alone- parts of the same equation
Left realism evaluation
- Too soft- lack of evidence of the offender’s motives (Right realism)
- Merely an extension of radical criminology
- Focuses on the working class (Marxists)
- Generalisation- not all deprived people turn to crime
- Limited gender explanation (Carlen)