Legitimate Expectations Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What is the doctrine of legitimate expectation?

A

A judicially developed principle of administrative law ensuring fairness in public administration

It allows individuals to have reasonable expectations of treatment by administrative authorities based on past practices or promises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who first articulated the doctrine of legitimate expectation in English common law?

A

Lord Denning MR in Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (1969)

This case established the initial procedural aspects of the doctrine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two dimensions of legitimate expectation recognized in English law?

A

Procedural and substantive dimensions

Substantive legitimate expectations were notably recognized in the case of Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (1985).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do English courts generally treat substantive legitimate expectations?

A

With caution and a high threshold for recognition

This reflects a focus on policy flexibility for public authorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the primary focus of Caribbean courts regarding legitimate expectation?

A

A broader interpretation, particularly regarding substantive protections

Caribbean jurisprudence shows a greater willingness to protect individuals from abrupt policy changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What triggers the doctrine of procedural legitimate expectation?

A

When a public authority creates a reasonable expectation of following a specific procedure before making a decision

Examples include consultation or a hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What landmark case clarified procedural legitimate expectations in English law?

A

Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (1969)

This case established that individuals with legitimate expectations should have a method to challenge adverse decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the House of Lords establish in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (1985)?

A

Procedural legitimate expectation arises from promises or practices individuals can reasonably rely upon

Expectations must not conflict with overriding public interest considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a key principle illustrated by R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody (1994)?

A

Procedural fairness is fundamental, but legitimate expectation is limited to ensuring a fair hearing

It does not extend to substantive outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Caribbean Court of Justice’s (CCJ) position on procedural legitimate expectation?

A

It promotes accountability and reinforces the obligation to honor expectations created by administrative conduct

This stance contrasts with English law, which generally allows public authorities more leeway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the outcome of Attorney General v Boyce (2009) regarding procedural expectations?

A

Public authorities must follow established procedures when individuals have relied on them

The ruling emphasized fairness and procedural adherence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the court rule in Guyana Geology and Mines Commission v. Diamond Quarry Inc. & Baracara Quarries Inc. (2021)?

A

The need for consistency and fairness in procedural frameworks before revoking permits

This case highlighted the significance of procedural legitimate expectation in Guyanese administrative law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Legal Officers Staff Association and Manley, Tasha et al v Attorney General et al [2015], what principle was reinforced?

A

Expectations can arise from promises or established practices, and failure to consult violates fairness principles

This case contributed to Jamaica’s evolving administrative accountability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

True or False: Caribbean courts generally adopt a more discretionary approach to legitimate expectations than English courts.

A

True

They balance individual rights with the operational integrity of administrative bodies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectation in administrative law?

A

It arises when a public authority creates a reasonable expectation that a person will receive a specific benefit or outcome through a clear and unambiguous promise or established practice.

It differs from procedural legitimate expectation, which concerns the fairness of the process rather than the substance of the decision.

17
Q

What must be proven for a substantive legitimate expectation to exist?

A

The expectation must be unqualified, clear, and unambiguous.

It must also be attributed to someone with real or apparent authority.

18
Q

In which case was it emphasized that subjective belief is insufficient for substantive legitimate expectation?

A

Pharsalus Inc v Commissioner of the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (2013) 83 WIR 401.

19
Q

What is the typical requirement for applicants regarding information disclosure in substantive legitimate expectation cases?

A

Applicants are usually required to disclose all pertinent information.

20
Q

What burden shifts to the public authority after the elements of substantive legitimate expectation are proven?

A

The burden of proving an overriding interest to justify frustrating the expectation.

21
Q

How have English courts historically viewed substantive legitimate expectations?

A

They have been reluctant to acknowledge them as a basis for judicial review.

22
Q

What concerns led English courts to initially resist recognizing substantive legitimate expectations?

A
  • Fettering policy discretion
  • Creating estoppel against public authorities
  • Undermining the separation of powers
23
Q

Which case marked a shift in English courts’ approach to substantive legitimate expectations?

A

R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex p Coughlan [2001] QB 213.

24
Q

What did Laws LJ emphasize regarding abuse of power in R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie?

A

Abuse of power is becoming a core public law concept.

25
What did the Court of Appeal clarify in R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie?
Substantive expectations must not override legislative intent or confer unauthorized rights.
26
What was affirmed in R v Newham London Borough Council, ex p. Bibi regarding legitimate expectations?
Detriment and reliance are factual matters rather than legal ones.
27
What are the three practical considerations outlined by Schiemann LJ in cases involving legitimate expectations?
* Clarity of the promise * Deviation by the authority * Justification for the deviation
28
What principle did Laws LJ suggest in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Nadarajah?
A promise or adopted practice should be honored unless there is 'good reason not to do so.'
29
How do Caribbean courts differ in their approach to substantive legitimate expectations compared to English courts?
Caribbean courts provide wider protection from arbitrary government actions and are more receptive to substantive legitimate expectations.
30
Which case is cited as a 'revolutionary' ruling by the Caribbean Court of Justice regarding substantive legitimate expectation?
Attorney General v Joseph and Boyce [2006] CCJ 3; (2006) 69 WIR 104.
31
What did the CCJ lay down as requirements for determining whether an expectation is legitimate?
* Must be addressed explicitly to the individuals affected * Courts must conduct a balancing exercise to review fairness
32
What did the Privy Council conclude in Paponette v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago regarding substantive legitimate expectation?
There were sufficient facts to induce a substantive legitimate expectation based on government representations.
33
What was the outcome of Leacock v Attorney General regarding substantive legitimate expectation?
The court upheld a claim based on a customary practice of granting study leave to police officers.
34
In Chang v Minister of Health, what did the court emphasize regarding legitimate expectations?
Legal rights cannot be attributed contrary to the plain words of a statute.
35
What are some reasons for the differences in views on legitimate expectations between Caribbean and English courts?
* Legal frameworks * Judicial precedent * Cultural and societal influences * Administrative practices * Judicial philosophy
36
What characterizes the legal framework in Caribbean jurisdictions regarding legitimate expectations?
A mixture of English common law, local statutes, and constitutional provisions reflecting historical and social contexts.
37
What does the post-colonial legacy in the Caribbean influence regarding legitimate expectations?
It allows for a more expansive view aimed at rectifying historical injustices.
38
How do Caribbean courts generally interpret legitimate expectations compared to English courts?
Caribbean courts may interpret them more flexibly, prioritizing fairness and social justice.
39
What is the conclusion regarding the perspectives of Caribbean and English courts on legitimate expectations?
They diverge significantly due to distinct historical, cultural, and socio-political contexts.