Lesson 10: Foraging Behavior Flashcards
(38 cards)
human beings are what kind of predators
visual
some other sensory modalities
- vibration detection
- taste ( a form of chemoreception like smell))
- heat detection
- electroreception
lateral line system
- fish have a series of sensory structures that detect movement in the water
- can compare info from both sides of body to localize source of movement
external chemical senses
fish also can sense chemicals in water from ‘external taste’ receptors
how do catfish track their prey if they live in murky water
- water movement (vibration)
- external taste ( dissolve chemicals in water)
Catfish Experiment
Observed Catfish hunting individual guppies - and used infared video system to track movement of both predator and prey in complete darkness
Identified 3 types of movement
1.) path following
2.) head-on encounters
3.) attack on stationary guppy
Results
- 80% of attacks occured on moving guppies
- catfish usually followed the same path as the guppy before the attack
Lateral Line Structures (more for the catfsish)
- hair cells are mechanoreceptors sensitive to deflections caused by water movements
- organized into “neuromast organs” distributed along the length of the body
Catfish Experimental Approach
Manipulated either:
1.) External gustation aka taste (reduced ability to detect chemical cues)
OR
2.) lateral line (reduced ability to detect hydrodynamic cues)
RESULTS:
Intact (control - 65%
External chemical detection ablated - 60%
Ablated lateral line - 17%
^^^
Suggests that lateral line is more important than taste in terms of success
Electroreception in Sharks
electroreception is the ability to detect electric fields - an electric field can travel from its source in water but not in air, so it is useful for aquatic species
Electroreception in Sharks (Tank + Setup )
the testing tank had a sandy bottom - water entered the tank through a buried pipe and emerged from the sand near the other side of the tank
- a special agar holding chamber was connected to the inflow pipe so that water could pass through the chamber and out the other side
Electroreception in sharks experiment
a.) buried live flounder – accurate attack
b.) live flounder in an agar chamber (control) – accurate attack
c.) flounder pieces in agar chamber – attack at displaced odor site
d.) buried live flounder with plastic insulation – no attack
e.) plain electrodes – attacked
f.) plain electrodes vs. actual chunk of dead fish – attacked electrodes first
lemurs
- small primates from the island of Madagascar
- almost entire nocturnal and feeds mostly on fruit and insects
lemur experiment
1.) trained lemurs to remove plastic lid from a bowl in order to get a mealworm
2.) then did choice experiment in which the lemurs had to identify which of the two bowls had the mealworm
Different cues : lemur experiment
olfactory cue: live mealworm in cup
No olfactory cue: live mealworm in air-filled bag
auditory cue: live mealworm in cup with paper
no auditory cue: dead mealworm in cup with paper
lemur experiment: results
3 modalities: best chance
2 modalities: V+A and V+O were the best (needed visual)
1 modality: visual was the best
evolutionary arms race
back and forth process of adaptation and counteradaption
counteradaption
in predators – adapt to better detect hidden or cryptic prey
2 possible behavioral counteradaptions if prey are cryptic
- search rate hypothesis
- search image hypothesis
search rate hypothesis
animal detects cryptic prey and then slows rate of search to find more
search image hypothesis
animal forms a mental image which helps it focus on the visual features of the prey
bobwhite foraging: search rate hypothesis
- trained birds to feed on food pellets on the floor of a large room
- then tested birds to see what happened if the pellets were hard to see
bobwhite foraging results:
the more cryptic the prey, the more slowly the birds walked around the room
blue jay foraging: search image hypothesis
- trained birds to search for month images on a computer screen
- started with easy-to-see moths and then swithed to cryptic ones (used catocala retecta)
blue jay foraging experiment and results
1st run: no moth or catacola relicta
2nd run: no moth or catacola retecta
3rd group or “non run”: no C. retecta or C. relicta or no moth
RESULTS
- in both of the run treatments (just one species in the run), the percent of correct responses increases
- in the nonrun treatment (both species mixed in) the percent of responses did not change over trials
CONCLUSTION
- this implies that the visual appearance of the moths mattered to the jays - otherwise the nonrun would not have differed from te run