liberalism Flashcards
(48 cards)
5 liberal thinkers
John Locke
JS Mill
Mary Collstonecraft
John Rawls
Betty Friedan
early classical liberalism
- revolutionary potential
- negative liberty
- minimal state
- laissez-faire capitalism
revolutionary potential
- John Locke
- a government should exist consensually, and a state should be driven by the representative of the people
- associated with England’s Glorious Revolution
positive liberty / social justice general
more modern idea (late 19th century)
the nature of modern economics meant that individuals were increasingly subject to forces beyond their control.
John Locke
- “the father of liberalism” - classical liberalism
- “Two Treatises of Government”
- rejected the ideas of “the divine right of kings”. the state was created by man and should serve people’s interest with their consent
- there was a “natural society” that was individualistic but contained “natural liberties and rights”, before the state
- social contract theory
- seperation of powers and religious tolerance
- no modern democracy, outdated ideas of equality
john locke analogy
no farmer = the animals hurt eachother
but what stops the farmer from abusing the animals
= shows the need for a limited government.
mary wollstonecraft
- first wavefeminist writer
- “A Vindication of the Rights of Women”
- keys to women reaching their potential were equal education, opportunities, legal protections
- marriage should be between two equals. male tyranny over wives is bad, just as tyranny of tyranny of the state is wrong
- supported American and French Revolutions and the constitutional defence of individual rights but stressed this should be for men and women
JS Mill
- link between classical and modern liberalism = some state intervention to help the poor
- favoured inheritance tax as wealth passed through generations gave unfair advantages
- humanity looked to improve human civilisation.
- Govt intervene as little as possible but later modified his views to accept the state must intervene to help individuals achieve developmental individualism (what people can become, not what they are).
- On Liberty
- harm principle and negative liberty
- tolerance even of the minority,
negative and positive liberty
negative
TH Green then develops positive liberty
john rawls
- A Theory of Justice
- everyone should be guaranteed a life worth living, builds on natural rights
- modernised idea of social contract theory by adding socio-economic aspects
- natural rights
- advocated for redistribution of wealth to give balance of opportunity = rational opinion. not socialist, narrows wealth gap not ensuring absolute equality of outcome
- rejected both communism and unregulated capitalism - looking to “property-owning democracy”
betty friedan
- second wave feminist
- The Feminine Mystique
- women are held back from reaching their potential by societal attitudes and laws
- pushed for enforcement of anti-discriminatory laws by Fed govt through the National Organisation for Women
- “cultural channels” eg school and media + organised religion = Women have been socially conditioned to believe they should find fulfilment in being solely mothers and wives
- change should be pacifist and through insitutions
locke on human nature
positive - humans are rational and logical
“tabula rasa” - we are each born as a clean slate, not tainted
Mill on human nature
developmental individualism
human nature is not fixed, it is forever progressing to a higher level.
Rawls on human nature
mankind is selfish yet empathetic
veil of ignorance, humans will usually choose the most loving option
Friedan on human nature
- human nature has evolved in such a way that discourages self-advancement in women.
- cultural channels have developed, stifling the advancement of women who have been socially conditioned to believe fulfilment is only found in homemaker roles
Wollstonecraft on human nature
- rationalism is present in both gender
“the mind has no gender”
agreements and disagreements within liberalism on human nature
+ rationality
+ self-interest
+ empathy
- classical believe human nature is fixed, moderns think it is progressing to a higher level. eg Locke and neo-liberals eg Hayek think that humans are innately blessed with qualities
modern liberals - individuals along the concept of individuality can become XYZ once “enabled” to fulfil their potential
general liberals on human nature
Liberals see people as rational individuals, capable of perceiving their own interests and taking their own decisions. They stress the positive potential of human nature. People should be free to make the most of their talents, enjoying equality of opportunity. A good society is also one in which there is tolerance of different values, customs and beliefs.
john rawls on the state
advocated for an enlarged and enabling state to redistribute wealth and ensure equality of opportunity
mary wollstonecraft on the state
the monarchical state should be replaced by a republic which enshrines womens’ rights
JS Mill on the state
Developmental individualism - people should be free to develop their own talents etc without interference and further humanity.
Harm Principle - the state should only exercise authority to prevent harm.
locke on the state
The state must be representative and enable individual liberties. Protect life, liberty and property (not education etc)
friedan on the state
The state should intervene in education, job opportunity etc to promote the interests of women as society has been manufactured to stop them. The fairest thing would be to extend the same opportunity to women.
agreements and disagreements within liberalism on the state
+ there should be a state
+ should have basic powers to allow order and protection
+ should be representative democracy - power to remove and appoint
+ all agree the state should be limited
+ natural rights
- Rawls and Friedan advocate for the state to have more intervention to ensure equality of opportunity. BUT Locke and Mill think that the state’s presence is enough and should not entangle our lives
- Mill thinks “negative liberty”, minimal and individuals unchecked. BUT Friedan says “positive liberty”, state should be more extensive to enable an individual to reach potential
- also Mill, BF and Wollstonecraft say that women should be part of the state, but locke would disagree