Limitations on Exclusion Flashcards

(58 cards)

1
Q

Good faith exception cases

A
  • Leon
  • Krull
  • Evans
  • Herring
  • Davis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Leon is about ___

A

facially invalid warrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Krull is about __

A

facially constitutional statutes later found uncon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evans is about __

A

court clerk/employee errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Herring is about ___

A

negligent errors made by another police employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Davis is about ___

A

binding appellate precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When source of error lead to 4A violation is someone other than LE, ___

A

probably good faith exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Leon, the trial court had found the ___

A

warrant affidavit insufficient to support PC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Leon rationalizes that point of exclusion is deterrence but __

A

here nothing diff for police to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Leon opens up the possibility that judges could __

A

not decided difficult 4A cases and could decided on good faith ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Brennan dissents in Leon to say __

A

exclusion should be part of 4A right and not just remedy, judicial integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Officer only able to find warrant for controlled substances but this homicide investigation. Crosses out controlled substances on first page but not second where judge signs. Judge approves and promises to fix. Judge doesn’t fix

A

Ct says entitled to believe judge would take care of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Officer only able to find warrant for controlled substances but this homicide investigation. Crosses out controlled substances on first page but not second where judge signs. Judge approves and promises to fix. Judge doesn’t fix. Argument against good faith

A

if officer had read would’ve found facial error, they both made mistakes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Herring facts

A

police officer called sheriff’s employee to see if outstanding warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Herring says no deterrence _____

A

for negligent mistakes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Despite Herring if the police have __ or ___ exclusion applies

A

been negligent in maintaining warrant system, knowingly made false entries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Officer suspected car carrying drugs but no RS or PC. Wrote down license plate and relayed numbers but didn’t follow policy to use codewords and dispatcher misheard. Ran plate and said it belonged to different truck than what officer was seeing.

A

Mistake but made by cop rather than county clerk so exclusion could potentially deter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Officers are looking into potential illegal activity in a hotel. Rented a room to surveil. Get checked into a room believed to be vacant but there is a suitcase and a jacket. Go into room and call down to the desk to alert front desk. Other officer idly opens TV cabinet and finds cocaine. Later D arrives at hotel says he said paid in the morning to stay for another day.

A

Is deterrence served by suppression
Also maybe reasonable not to poke around rooms not theirs
Could argue REP in room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Davis says the sole point of exclusion is LE deterrence and there is no deterrent effect in suppressing evidence ___

A

discovered by police following proper practice at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Griffith says that new rules for conduct of crim prosecutions are supposed to ___

A

apply retroactively to all cases pending on review or not yet final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

To have standing for suppression you must be ___

A
  • person police using evidence against
    AND
    person whose 4A rights violated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Carter says that social guests in host’s home ___

A

usually have standing bc REP in area searched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Standing technically not doctrine in 4A but shorthand for -__

A

violation of 4A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Jones is about ___

A

target theory

25
Under the target theory, a D can seek exclusion if search or seizure ___
directed at him even if search took place in someone else's home
26
Alderman ____ with Jones
conflicted
27
Rakas ____ target theory
overruled
28
Rakas facts
Police thought getaway car from robbery. found rifle in backseat shells in passenger glove compartment, D didn't own car or rifle, one of car occupants
29
Rakas says that search of ____ doesn't violate 4A rights
third party premises/property
30
Rakas rejected target theory in part because ___
required looking at officer subjective motivations
31
Rawlings facts
third party home, police found drugs in handbag of woman next to D. Said drugs were his but later moved to suppress
32
Rawlings said D no standing bc ____
no REP in the purse
33
Rawlings said ownership of drugs not enough because ___
no REP in place searched (didn't know woman well, put in purse maybe without consent, never given access to purse in the past)
34
Officers arrest Jones as he left downtown office. His briefcase shows documents connecting to Bonny who leads gambling rings. Can Bonny challenge?
No doesn't have REP in his briefcase
35
Payner facts
D charged with false tax return with foreign bank account. Agents lured banker to hotel room and then to dinner. While at dinner police searched banker briefcase in room w/o warrant or PC
36
Payner held that ___
didn't have standing because room/documents/briefcase belonged to banker not D
37
Carter held that social guests may have REP but not social guest here because ___
fleeting and substantial connection to apt, packaging cocaine sole purpose in being there, only there 2 hours, never been before
38
If Carter decided on property terms then __
maybe leased space in doing this transaction
39
At a party and police storm in and find drugs. Which party guest can complain?
- everyone invited definitely - crashers too if big party, if small, invite only less so
40
Narcotics surveillance of drug lord. See someone knock and enter hotel room. Police storm hotel room and interrupt transaction. Who could complain?
Dealer -- leased room so REP + property interest Buyer - not if first time, maybe if ongoing relationship
41
Cynthia's purse contains paraphernalia and is in locked glove compartment. Drugs in trunk and drugs in backseat. Ted owns car and seated in front seat. Blatantly unlawful search. Can Ted move to suppress drugs in backseat?
Yes, property interest + REP
42
Cynthia's purse contains paraphernalia and is in locked glove compartment. Drugs in trunk and drugs in backseat. Ted owns car and seated in front seat. Blatantly unlawful search. Can Ted move to suppress evidence from interior of purse?
Probably not
43
Cynthia's purse contains paraphernalia and is in locked glove compartment. Drugs in trunk and drugs in backseat. Ted owns car and seated in front seat. Blatantly unlawful search. What about driver Cynthia?
Not her car but REP bc locked compartment, can complain about everything though bc driver similar to owner
44
Cynthia's purse contains paraphernalia and is in locked glove compartment. Drugs in trunk and drugs in backseat. Ted owns car and seated in front seat. Blatantly unlawful search. What about passengers in back?
Maybe limited to drugs next to him, if his drugs Probably not trunk or glove dept bc no access Better argument for REP if ongoing relationship, like get a ride everyday
45
What is attenuation
connection between violation and evidence indirect enough that we don't need to suppress (would evidence have been discovered in spite of violation)
46
fruits of poisonous tree says must suppress evidence ____
physical or verbal that is direct fruit of illegal conduct
47
Under Murray if knowledge of evidence illegally seized was ____ exclusionary rule doesn't apply
also obtained by independent source
48
Wong Sun facts
Enter Toy's home illegally no PC but made statement bought heroin from Yee. Find heroin. Yee says got from Wong Sun so enter Wong Sun home and arrest without PC.
49
What to suppress for Wong Sun
statements while unlawfully in police custody
50
What not to suppress for Wong Sun
Yee heroin, no 4A violation against Wong Sun Wong Sun post-arraignment unsigned statements (enough time passed that taint of illegal arrest dissipated)
51
Ceccolini says that if fruit is ___ then ___
live witness, less likely to suppress
52
Murray suggests that the exclusionary rule should put police in ____ not ___
same position as if no illegal search, worse
53
Nix v. Williams is about ___
inevitable discovery
54
Nix facts
murder victim's body after illegally questioning, multiple search teams looking for the young girl's body
55
Exclusionary rule doesn't apply to knock and announce rule under Hudson because ___
about human safety/dignity, not about preventing govt from seeing evidence
56
Strieff says that an ____ can be valid basis for arrest even if originally no RS or PC
open warrant/valid basis for arrest
57
Strieff says original illegality of the stop was attenuated because the police conduct was ___
at most negligent, not flagrant and not part of a system or recurring policy
58
General limitations on exclusion
- impeachment - attenuation (poison fruit, independent source, inevitable discovery) - good faith exception - standing