List of Lists Flashcards
(201 cards)
Acquisition Plans within PEO portfolio
Supplies > $10M - PEO
Services > $10M - SDO or designee
Acquisition plans Other Contracting
Supplies > $10M - SCCO
Services > $10M - SDO or designee, or SCCO (when no SDO)
Acquisition plans >SAT
One level above the CO (signs SASS) or SDO if services in PEO portfolio
ASP Chairperson AFPEO/CM acquisition
PEO
ASP Chairperson “other contracting” supplies
SCCO
if >SAT
ASP Chairperson “other contracting” services
SDO, or SCCO if no SDO
if >SAT
Clearance threshold - noncompetitive
> $500M: DAS(c)/HCA (SAF/AQC) business clearance only
$50M < 500M: SCCO
25M <50M: One level below SCCO, COCO
5M <25M: Two level below SCCO, Div. chief
Clearance threshold - competitive
> $1B: DAS(c)/HCA (SAF/AQC) business clearance only
$50M < 1B: SCCO
25M <50M: One level below SCCO, COCO
5M <25M: Two level below SCCO, Div. chief
MIRT
Multi-functional Independent review team
5 critical decision point for MIRTs
Pre-Business clearance Critical Decision Point
- review draft ASP Brief or review of draft acquisition plan (AP)
- Review RFP (namely L and M)
- Review draft initial Evaluation/ Competitive range brief or review draft award without discussions brief
Pre Contract clearance CDPs
- review draft final proposal revision (FPR) request
- review draft source selection decision briefing
Peer Review - when required?
Non-competitive >500M
Business Clearance
Contract clearance
Competitive >1B
Pre- RFP
Final Proposal Revision
Contract Award
Services
>1B, also requires post-award peer review
FAR Part 6 does not apply to:
- Simplified Acquisition Procedures (FAR Part 13)
- using contract procedures required by statute
- mods against a contract within scope and terms
- definite quantity/ requirements contract orders
- IDIQ contract orders
- TO & DO Contract Orders
- Health Care personal services (DFARS 237.104(b)(ii)
- follow of production contracts under “other transactions” agreements for prototype projects
7 exception to full and open competition
- only one responsible source and no other supply/service will satisfy agency requirements
- unusual and compelling urgency - only 1 year
- industrial mobilization, engineering, development, research capability or expert services - used in sustainment centers, compete for a share of the market
- international agreement- FMS
- authorized or required by statute- brand name, required source
- national security- big safari
- public interest
J&A approval thresholds
<700K: Contracting officer, as long as within warrant authority & delegated by COCO
>700k <13.5M - competition advocate
>13.5M <93M - PEO/ head of procuring activity/ designated alternate (flag/general officer or SES)(SCCO)
>93M: SPE (SAF/AQ)
Exceptions to Notice of Proposed Contract Actions
- National security (classified information) (6.302-6)
- unusual and compelling urgency (6.302-2)
- international agreement (6.302-4)
- authorized or required by statute (6.302-5)
- utility services - only one source available
- IDIQ delivery or task order
- small business innovation development act (SBIR)
- unsolicited research proposal
- perishable subsistence supplies
- industrial mobilization or public interest (6.302-3 and 7)
- under terms of an existing contract that was previously synopsized
- by a defense agency and made or performed outside of the US and only local sources solicited
- ,SAT and a) made through means that provide access to the notice through GPE b)permits the public to respond to the solicitation electronically
- expert services for litigation or dispute (6.302-3)
- agency head determination that synopsis is not appropriate/ reasonable
exceptions to post award notice
- Unsolicited research proposal
- SBIR
- IDIQ or FSS
- perishable subsistence supplies
- utility services - only one source available
6.
factors to consider in selecting contract type
- price competition
- price analysis
- cost analysis
- type and complexity of the requirement
- combining contract types
- urgency of the requirement
- period of performance of length of production run
- contractor’s technical capability and financial responsibility
- adequacy of the contractor’s accounting system
- Concurrent contract
- extent and nature of proposed subcontracting
- acquisition history
FPIF elements
target cost
target profit
price ceiling, as a percentage of total cost
profit adjustment formula (share ratio/lines)
point of total assumption = (ceiling price - target price)/government share of ration + target cost
CPIF Elements
target cost target fee fee adjustment formula (share line/ ratio) minimum fee Maximum fee`
Source Selection Information Definition
- Bid prices submitted in response to an agency invitation for bids, or lists of those bid prices before bid opening.
- Proposed costs or prices submitted in response to an agency solicitation, or lists of those proposed costs or prices.
- Source selection plans.
- Technical evaluation plans.
- Technical evaluations of proposals.
- Cost or price evaluations of proposals.
- Competitive range determinations that identify proposals that have a reasonable chance of being selected for award of a contract.
- Rankings of bids, proposals, or competitors.
- Reports and evaluations of source selection panels, boards, or advisory councils.
- Other information marked as “Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” based on a case-by-case determination by the head of the agency or the contracting officer, that its disclosure would jeopardize the integrity or successful completion of the Federal agency procurement to which the information relates.
Definition of Past Performance
Contractor’s record of:
• Conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship
• Forecasting and controlling costs
• Adherence to contract schedules
• Reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction
• Reporting into databases
• Integrity and business ethics
• Business-like concern for the interests of the customer
7 Standards of Contractor Responsibility
- Adequate financial resources or ability to obtain them
- Be able to comply with required schedule
- Satisfactory performance record
- Satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics
- Necessary organization, experience, accounting and operation controls, and technical skills
- Necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities
- Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations
LPTA Rating Scales
Cost/Price Factor Reasonableness Balance Realism Technical Factors: Acceptable Unacceptable Past Performance (if used): Acceptable Unacceptable
Tradeoff Rating Scales
Cost/Price Factor Reasonableness Balance Realism Total Evaluated Price (TEP) Technical Factors: Blue - Outstanding Purple - Good Green - Acceptable Yellow - Marginal Red - Unacceptable Technical Risk Ratings (if separate): Low Moderate High