logic Flashcards

1
Q

Logic

A

Derived from Greek word “logos”, which means reasoned speech.
It is the study of how we reason and make sound judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inductive reasoning

A

Specific- general.
Observing particular things and drawing general conclusions. Foundation for scientific revolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Deductive reasoning.

A

General statements- specific conclusions. The conclusions are based only on the statements. It is applied to certainty. Used commonly in medieval schools, as the primary method of thinking and reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Aristotle and the three rules of logic

A

1) Law of non contradiction
2) Law of excluded middle
3) Law of identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Premise

A

A factual statement or proposition. It provides a reason for believing the conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conclusion

A

A statement that follows the premise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Syllogism

A

One of the basic forms of an argument. Contains two premises and a conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Formal logic

A

The study of how to tell good reasoning from bad reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reasoning

A

the process of providing reasons in support of an idea or an action. It is the primary method in philosophy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Argument

A

the use of one or more reasons to support an idea or action. its a combination of premises and conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Inference

A

The mental process that occurs when we go rom a premise (reasons) to conclusions. It may lead to certain conclusions (deduction) or probable conclusions (induction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Affirming the antecedent

A

Agreeing that the antecedent is true.
If p, then q
p
Therefore q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Antecedent

A

Something that goes before/procceeds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consequent

A

following as a result as

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Denying the consequent

A

Denying that the consequent is true.
If p, then q
not q
therefore not p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

chain argument

A

If p, then q.
if q, then r.
Therefore, if p, then r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Informal logic

A

Reasoning is found in everyday life
Judges the value of info and the strength of arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Rhetorical devices

A

Words/ arguments used to convince people through choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Relevance

A

Used for judging arguments.
“Does the argument have relevance to the topic being discussed?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Empirical Value

A

Empirical info can be verified or obtained through senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Non Empirical info

A

Expresses beliefs, values and opinions that cannot be verified through observation.

22
Q

Bias

A

The tendency to view objects, people, or events from a particular point of view.
There are many sources of bias (environment, culture, or experience)
Can distort or weaken an argument

23
Q

Reliability

A

Info and sources can be reliable when they are trusted. There are degrees and levels of reliability.

24
Q

Logical fallacies

A

methods of an argument that contain flaws in how to conclusions are drawn

25
personal attack(ad hominem fallacy)
Attacks the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
26
Post hoc ( fake cause fallacy)
Just because an event follows another, doesn't mean that event caused the other
27
Guilt by association (ad hominem)
Presumes a person has a characteristic because of their relationship with people/objects
28
Straw person
when someone attacks a minor or irrelevant part of an opponent's position and concludes that the opponents real position has been refuted
29
Begging the question (Circular reasoning)
When an arguments premises assume the truth of the conclusion.
30
Hasty conclusion (jumping to conclusions or hasty generalization)
When one tries to draw a firm conclusion inductively, based on insufficient evidence
31
Inconsistency
When an argument contains a contradiction
32
False dichotomy (false dilemma fallacy)
When there are only 2 alternatives offered to an argument (in reality there are more than 2)
33
Glittering generalities
No details about the argument provided, just general statements surrounded by emotional or "glittering" words
34
Card stacking (stacking the deck)
Presents facts which favour one point of view, and ignores the facts that support an opposing view
35
bandwagon
Uses popularity or public opinion as a reason for beieving/ doing something
36
Appeal to the authority
Relies n the use of an important or well known person or source instead of actual evidence to support a position or a product
37
Philosophy of science
Philosophers sought wisdom, including scientific knowledge. Explores questions like 1) Is science objective? 2) Can scientific theories be proven? 3) are science and religion compatible
38
The scientific revolution
Distinguished science from philosophy
39
The difference between scientists and philosophers
Scientists: Focus on observable phenomena and first order questions Philosophers: Address second order quetions
40
Pre- renaissance: philosophy of science
Pre socratics sough reason based explanations for nature and human experience
41
Aristotle: philosophy of science
First philosopher of science. Advocated for systemic observation, data collection and classification.
42
Middle ages
Christin thinkers like Aquinas incorporated Aristotle's geocentric universe in theology. Due to chruch dominance, scientific philosophy slowed down. 12the century muslim philosophers preserved it.
43
Paradigm shift
New discoveries challenges geocentric views and church authority
44
Copernicus
Heliocentric theoru
45
Galileo and kepler
Supported Copernicus, but faces persecution
46
Francis bacon
Empiricism and scientific methods
47
Issac newton
Universal laws of motion via reason and calculus (rationalism)
48
Charles darwin
challenged divine creation with natural selection. Sparked the Darwinian revolution and a paradigm shift .
49
David hume
question inductive reasoning ad certainty of causality
50
aLBERTY einstien
theory of relativity altered view on origins and the universe
51
Keiji nishitan
raised concerns about scinece leading to nihilism
52