Logic Volker Definitions Flashcards

(74 cards)

1
Q

Binary relation

A

A set is a binary relation iff it contains only ordered pairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Binary Relation: Reflective

A

reflective on a set S iff for all elements d of S the pair ⟨d, d⟩is an element of R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Binary Relation: Symmetric

A

symmetric on a set S iff for all elements d, e of S: if ⟨d, e⟩∈R then ⟨e, d⟩∈R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Binary Relation: Asymmetric

A

asymmetric on a set S iff for no elements d, e of S: ⟨d, e⟩∈R and ⟨e, d⟩∈R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Binary Relation: Antisymmetric

A

antisymmetric on a set S iff for no two distinct elements d, e of S: ⟨d, e⟩∈Rand ⟨e, d⟩∈R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Binary Relation: Transitive

A

transitive on a set S iff for all elements d, e, f of S: if ⟨d, e⟩∈R and ⟨e, f⟩∈R, then ⟨d, f⟩∈R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Equivalence relation

A

A binary relation Ris an equivalence relation on S iff R is reflexive on S, symmetric on S and transitive on S

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Function

A

A binary relation R is a function iff for all d, e, f: if ⟨d, e⟩∈R and ⟨d, f⟩∈R then e= f

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Domain

A

The domain of a function R is the set {d : there is an e such that ⟨d, e⟩∈R}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

range

A

The range of a function R is the set {e : there is a d such that ⟨d, e⟩∈R}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Function into a set

A

R is a function into the set M iff all elements of the range of the function are in M

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Function notation

A

If dis in the domain of a function R one writes R(d) for the unique object e such that ⟨d, e⟩is in R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

n-ary relation

A

An n-place relation is a set containing only n-tuples. An n-place relation is called
a relation of arity n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Argument

A

An argument consists of a set of declarative sentences (the premises) and a declarative sentence (the conclusion) marked as the concluded sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Logical validity

A

An argument is logically valid iff there is no interpretation under which the premises are all true and the conclusion false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consistency

A

A set of sentences is logically consistent iff there is at least one interpretation under
which all sentences of the set are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Logical truth

A

A sentence is logically true iff it is true under any interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Contradiction

A

A sentence is a contradiction iff it is false under all interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Logical equivalence

A

Sentences are logically equivalent iff they are true under exactly the same
interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Sentence letters

A

P, Q, R, P1, Q1, R1, P2, Q2, R2 and so on are sentence letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Sentence of L1

A

(i) All sentence letters are sentences of L1.
(ii) If φ and ψ are sentences of L1, then¬φ, (φ∧ψ), (φ∨ψ), (φ→ψ) and (φ↔ψ) are sentences of L1.
(iii) Nothing else is a sentence of L1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Bracketing Convention

A

1 The outer brackets may be omitted from a sentence that is not part of another sentence.
2 The inner set of brackets may be omitted from a sentence of the form ((φ∧ψ) ∧χ) and
analgously for ∨.
3 Suppose ⋄∈{∧, ∨}and ◦∈{→, ↔}. Then if (φ◦(ψ⋄χ)) or ((φ⋄ψ)◦χ) occurs as part of
the sentence that is to be abbreviated, the inner set of brackets may be omitted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

L1-structure

A

An L1-structure is an assignment of exactly one truth-value (T or F) to every
sentence letter of L1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Truth in an L1-structure

A

Let A be some L1-structure. Then |…|A assigns either T or F to
every sentence of L1 in the following way.
(i) If φ is a sentence letter, |φ|A is the truth-value assigned to φ by the L1-structure A
(ii) |¬φ|A = T iff |φ|A = F
(iii) |φ∧ψ|A = T iff |φ|A = T and |ψ|A = T
(iv) |φ∨ψ|A = T iff |φ|A = T or |ψ|A = T
(v) |φ→ψ|A = T iff |φ|A = F or |ψ|A = T
(vi) |φ↔ψ|A = T iff |φ|A = |ψ|A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Logical truth L1
A sentence φ of L1 is logically true iff φ is true in all L1-structures.
26
Contradiction L1
A sentence φ of L1 is a contradiction iff φ is not true in any L1-structures.
27
Logical equivalence L1
A sentence φ and a sentence ψ of L1 are logically equivalent iff φ and ψ are true in exactly the same L1-structures.
28
Validity L1
Let Γ be a set of sentences of L1 and φ a sentence of L1. The argument with all sentences in Γ as premisses and φ as conclusion is valid iff there is no L1-structure in which all sentences in Γ are true and φ is false.
29
Counterexamples L1
An L1-structure is a counterexample to the argument with Γ as the set of premisses and φ as the conclusion iff for all γ ∈Γ we have |γ|A = T but |φ|A = F
30
Semantic Consistency L1
A set Γ of L1-sentences is semantically consistent iff there is an L1- structure A such that for all sentence γ ∈Γ we have |γ|A = T. A set Γ of L1-sentences is semantically inconsistent iff Γ is not semantically consistent
31
Truth-functionality
A connective is truth-functional iff the truth-value of the compound sentence cannot be changed by replacing a direct subsentence with another sentence having the same truth-value.
32
Scope of a connective in L1
The scope of an occurrence of a connective in a sentence φ of L1 is the occurrence of the smallest subsentence of φ that contains this occurrence of the connective.
33
Logical truth (propositional)
An English sentence is a tautology iff its formalization in propositional logic is logically true
34
Contradiction (propositional)
An English sentence is a contradiction iff its formalization in propositional logic is a contradiction
35
Consistency (propositional)
An set of English sentences is propositionally consistent iff the set of all their formalizations in propositional logic is semantically consistent.
36
Propositional validity
An argument in English is propositionally valid iff its formalization in L1 is valid
37
Arity
The value of the upper index of a predicate letter is called its arity. If a predicate letter does not have an upper index its arity is 0.
38
Constants
a, b, c, a1, b1, c1, a2, b2, c2, ... are constants
39
Variables
x, y, z, x1, y1, z1, x2, y2, z2, ... are variables
40
Atomic formulae of L2
If Z is a predicate letter of arity n and each of t1, ..., tn is a variable or constant, then Zt1 ...tn is an atomic formula of L2
41
Quantifier
A quantifier is an expression ∀v or ∃v where v is a variable
42
Formulae of L2
(i) All atomic formulae of L2 are formulae of L2. (ii) If φand ψ are formulae of L2 then¬φ, (φ∧ψ), (φ∨ψ), (φ→ψ) and (φ↔ψ) are formulae of L2. (iii) If v is a variable and φ is a formula then ∀vφ and ∃vφ are formulae of L2. (iv) Nothing else is a formula of L2.
43
Free occurrence of a variable
(i) All occurrences of variables in atomic formulae are free. (ii) The occurences of a varaiable that are free in φ and ψ are also free in¬φ, φ∧ψ, φ∨ψ, φ→ψ, and φ↔ψ. (iii) In a formula ∀vφ or ∃vφ no occurrence of the variable v is free; all occurrences of variables other than v that are free in φ are also free in ∀vφ and ∃vφ. An occurrence of a variable is bound in a formula iff it is not free. A variable occurs freely in a formula iff there is at least one free occurrence of the variable in the formula.
44
Sentence of L2
A formula of L2 is a sentence of L2 iff no variable occurs freely in the formula.
45
L2-structure
An L2-structure is an ordered pair ⟨D, I⟩where D is some non-empty set and I is a function from the set of all constants, sentence letters, and predicate letters such that *the value of every constant is an element of D *the value of every sentence letter is a truth-value T or F *the value of every n-ary predicate letter is an n-ary relation.
46
Variable assignment
A variable assignment over an L2-structure A assigns an element of the domain DA of A to each variable
47
Satisfaction
See notes...
48
Truth L2
A sentence φ is true in an L2-structure A iff |φ|αA = T for all variable assignments α over A (see notes...)
49
Logical truth L2
A sentence φ of L2 is logically true iff φ is true in all L2-structures
50
Contradiction L2
A sentence φ of L2 is a contradiction iff φ is not true in any L2-structures
51
Logical equivalence L2
Sentences φ and ψ of L2 are logically equivalent iff both are true in exactly the same L2-structures.
52
Consistency L2
A set Γ of L2-setences is semantically consistent iff there is an L2-structure Ain which all sentences in Γ are true. A set of L2-sentences is semantically inconsistent iff it is not semantically consistent.
53
Validity L2
Let Γ be a set of sentences of L2 and φ a sentence of L2. The argument with all sentences in Γ as premisses and φ as conclusion is valid iff there is no L2 structure in which all sentences in Γ are true and φ is false. This is abbreviated as Γ |= φ.
54
∧Intro
See notes...
55
∧Elim
See notes...
56
∨Intro
See notes...
57
∨Elim
See notes....
58
→Intro
See notes...
59
→Elim
See notes....
60
¬Intro
See notes...
61
¬Elim
See notes...
62
↔Intro
See notes...
63
↔Elim
See notes...
64
∀Intro
See notes: provided that the constant t does not occur in φ or in any undischarged assumption in the proof of φ[t/v]
65
∀Elim
See notes...
66
∃Intro
See notes...
67
∃Elim
See notes... provided that the constant t does not occur in ∃vφ or in ψ or in any undischarged as- sumption other than φ[t/v] in the proof of ψ.
68
=Intro
See notes...
69
=Elim
See notes...
70
Syntactic consistency
A set Γ of L2-sentences is syntactically consistent iff there is a sentence φ such that Γ φ
71
Scope of a quantifier or connective in L2
The scope of an occurrence of a quantifiers or a connective in a sentence φ of L2 is the occurrence of the smallest L2-formula that contains that occurrence of the quantifier or connective and is part of φ
72
Atomic formulae of L=
All atomic formulae of L2 are atomic formulae of L=. Furthermore, if s and t are variables or constants then s= t is an atomic formla of L=
73
Formulae of L=
(i) All atomic formulae of L= are formulae of L=. (ii) If φand ψ are formulae of L= then¬φ, (φ∧ψ), (φ∨ψ), (φ→ψ) and (φ↔ψ) are formulae of L=. (iii) If v is a variable and φ is a formula then ∀vφ and ∃vφ are formulae of L=. (iv) Nothing else is a formula of L=
74