Loss of Control Flashcards

defense for murder, reduces conviction to manslaughter

1
Q

Loss of Control intro

A

Partial defense to murder under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 which reduces conviction to voluntary manslaughter, so will not have a mandatory life sentence (BUT judge may still choose to give a life sentence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Loss of control definition

A

s.54(1) of C&J Act 2009

“where a person kills or is a party to the killing of another, D will not be convicted of murder if;

a) D;s act or omission resulted from D’s loss of control
b) the loss of control had a qualifying trigger
c) a person of the same age and sex of the D with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint in the circumstances would’ve acted the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements of loss of control

A
  1. D must have lost control
  2. Must be a qualifying trigger
  3. Standard of self control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Loss of control
A

s.54(2)
Loss of control does NOT have to be sudden - R V Jewel

temper, anger, acting out of character = NOT sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Qualifying Trigger
A

s.55
2 types of triggers

  1. Fear trigger s.55(3)
  2. anger trigger s.55(4)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fear Trigger (s.55(3))

A

D’s fear of violence:
“D has a fear of violence from V or an identified person”, doesn’t have to be V themselves - R V ward

where D initiated the violence = cannot rely on the defense - R V Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R V ward

A

successfully pleaded LofC after killing V who had attacked his brother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R V Dawes

A

found wife asleep, had altercation and stabbed her - no reliance on fear as he had induced the violence by waking her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anger Trigger

A

Things said or done (or both)
Objective test:
a) constituted circumstances of extremely grave character and…
b) caused D to have a justifiable sense of being wronged

R v Zebedee
R V bowyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Zebedee

A

D killed father with Alzheimers after hes soiled himself continually = not grave or justifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R V Bowyer

A

not a justifiable sense of being wronged as he was committing a burglary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RESTRICTIONS on the qualifying triggers

A

SEXUAL INFIDELITY (s.55(6))
Never a qualifying trigger by itself - can be integrated with other factors

R V Clinton
R V Hatter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R V Clinton

A

D and wife both on meds for depression - he lost control due to many factors such as wife telling him shed slept with other men, taunting him about suicide and saying she didnt want his children - here, sexual infidelity could be considered a factor as there was others as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R V Hatter

A

a break up will not normally constitute to entitle the D to feel a sense to feel seriously wronged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Standard of self control
A

“a person of D’s sex and age with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint in the same circumstances as the D would’ve acted in a similar way”

objective element - age/sex
subjective element - circumstances

R V Rejmanski - court confirmed that mental disorder may be relevant when deciding on standard of self control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R V Rejmanski

A

court confirmed that mental disorder may be relevant when deciding on standard of self control

17
Q

Voluntary intoxication exceptions to standard of self control

A

Voluntary intoxication cannot be considered for loss of control - confirmed in R V Amlash

BUT

if D had severe problem with alcohol/ drugs and was severely taughnted, may be able to form part of the circumstances