Loss of control Flashcards

(8 cards)

1
Q

What is loss of control and where it is defined in?

A

a person will not be guilty of murder if the killing resulted from a loss of control which had a qualifying trigger and a persons of d’s sex and age would’ve acted the same way

it is defined within s54(2) of the coroners and justices act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is s54(2) of loss of control and what case is this defined in

A

must be a total loss of control. This can be a sudden snap can be instead be a slow burn reaction

Jury can take past life experiences into account

(R v Jewell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is fear of violence (qualifying trigger) and what case is this defined in?

A

a fear of serious violence from the victim to themselves or another identifiable person. it is a subjective test and D must show that they have lost control due to genuine fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the things said or done(QT) and what case is this defined in?

A

A-any things said or done
B-which constitute a grave character
C-D a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged

(R v Zebedee)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are excluded matters of sexual infedelity and what case is this defined in?

A

where the v has been unfaithful to the d, they will not be able to claim the partial defence unless the infedility forms a wider contract of things said or done

(R v clinton)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are excluded matters of revenge

A

acting out of considered desire for revenge can never be regarded as a loss of control. This is even where there or have been said things said or done is a fear of serious violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the standard of self control and what case is this defined in?

A

a person of D sex and age with ordinary levels of tolerence and self restraint and in the cirumstance of the d might’ve acted the same or in a similiar way

(r v rejmanski)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

intoxication+LOC

A

voluntarily intoxication cannot be considered within LOC however if sober in the circumstance as the d with a normal degree of tolerence and self restraint mightve behaved the same way when confronted with the qualifying trigger then d may be able to rely on the defence

(r v asmelash)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly