LS Flashcards
(37 cards)
<!--StartFragment-->
Explain Kelley’s Two-Dimensional Model of Follower Behavior<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Two axes:
- Dependent, Uncritical <—> Independent / Critical Thinking
- Passive <—> Active
Sheep
- “Passive follower”
- Passive/dependent, uncritical thinking
- Lack initiative
- Do not play an active role
- Simply comply with any order given
Yes People
- “Conformist follower”
- Active/Dependent, Uncritical Thinking
- Readily Carry Out Orders Uncritically
- Dangerous if orders contradict standards
- Ex. Person who always says what he thinks leaders want to hear
Survivors
- “They don’t do anything but you can’t tell”
- Right in the middle
- Rarely committed to work/group goals
- Does just enough to get by
- Mediocre performers clogging the arteries of an organization
- Example: “ROAD” (Retired On Active Duty)
Alienated Follower
- “They will whine and gripe but never contribute to the work”
- “They know it all but don’t do anything”
- Passive/independent, critical thinking
- Festering wounds in an organization
- Criticize, but never offer constructive support
Effective Followers
- Active/independent, critical thinking
- Problem solvers
- Can work with others
- Reflect on goals of the organization
- Not hesitant to bring concerns to leader
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify the characteristics of the effective follower<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- Exemplify AF Core Values
- Decision Making
- Sound thought processes
- Achievement through teamwork
- Communication Skills
- Listening ability
- Reading comprehension
- Tactful feedback
- Commitment
- Displays loyalty
- Fully supportive of the mission and leadership
- Willing to go the “extra mile”
- Problem Solving
- Wants to be challenged
- Desires responsibility
- Organizational Understanding
- Can see the big picture
- Understands importance of their job
- Flexibility
- Can adapt and overcome
- Remains calm during new challenges
- Competence
- Never stops learning
- Actions speak louder than words
- Not afraid to share information
- Courage
- Stands up for what’s right
- Knows when to speak
- Knows when to be quiet
- Enthusiasm
- Passion and Excitement
- Positive Attitude
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
State the purpose of the ACA
<!--EndFragment-->
Airman Comprehensive Assessment
- <!--StartFragment-->
Used to document effectiveness/ duty performance.
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify which Airmen are required to receive an ACA
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Initial:
- Within 60 days of being assigned a rater
- Sets “ground rules”
- Colonel and below
- All enlisted
- So everybody except generals get rated
Midterm:
- Midway between the time supervision began and the projected performance report
- AB through SMSgt
- 2d Lt through Lt Col
- Have to give them to everyone but Chiefs and Colonels
End of Reporting Period / Follow-up
- Occurs in conjunction with the close out of a performance report
- AB through TSgt
- 2d Lt through Captain
- So Junior enlisted and company grade
Ratee Requested ACA
- Comes in and asks you
- Within 30 days of request, if at least 60 days have passed since last session
- You are required
Rater Directed
- Good or bad feedback
- Anytime rater deems necessary
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
State when ACA sessions are held for each rank
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- AB - TSgt: Initial, Midterm, End of Reporting Period
- MSgt - SMSgt: Initial, Midterm
- CMSgt: Initial
- 2d Lt - Capt: Initial, Midterm, End of Reporting Period
- Maj - Lt Col: Initial, Midterm
- Col: Initial
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Describe the sources of rater errors
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- Rating performance as “outstanding” when it is not
- Don’t want to hurt feelings
- More lenient when facing ratee
- Applying low personal standards
- Don’t want to impact career
- Middle range is where several should be
- Halo / horns
- People liked / disliked
- Limited observation and poor recall
- Stereotypes
- Overlook improvement on past performance
- Judged on most recent experiences rather than performance during the entire period
- E.g. skimmed cat, or chili cookoff winner
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify the ways to avoid rater errors
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- Exhibit the right attitude; remember the goal is to develop the individual
- Learn and practice good observation skills
- Gather and report supporting information
- Discriminate between relevant and irrelevant information
- Doing selective work sampling when direct observation is infrequent
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
State the purpose of Enlisted Performance Reports (EPR)<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Provides an official record of performance as viewed by officials in the rating chain who are closest to the actual work environment (AFI 36-2406)
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify who is required to receive an EPR<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- All enlisted members SrA thru CMSgt
- A1C and below if they have 20 months or more of Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS)
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify when an EPR is required<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- Annually if no changes during reporting cycle
- After a change during the reporting cycle when there has been 120 days or more of supervision (change in reporting official, PCS, and PCA)
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Describe the promotion methods for enlisted personnel<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Enlisted Career Progression System
High/ Low Year Tenure (HYT)
<!--StartFragment-->
- E-4 (SrA): 8 yrs of service
- E-5 SSgt: 15/ 3
- E-6 TSgt: 20 / 5
- E-7 MSgt: 24/ 8
- E-8 SMSgt: 26 /11
- E-9 CMSgt: 30 / 14
<!--StartFragment-->
Enlisted Promotion System “Fully Qualified”<!--StartFragment-->
- Going from E-1 to E-4
- It is an auto-promote. Put stripes on based on time
- All must meet time in grade requirements
- E-4 senior airman – must receive skill level
<!--StartFragment-->
Enlisted Promotion System “Weighted Airman Promotion System” (WAPS) E5-E7<!--EndFragment--><!--StartFragment-->
- Max Pts
- Enlisted Performance Reports Points (EPRs): 135
- Specialty Knowledge Test (SKT): 100
- Professional Development Guide (PDG) Test: 100
- Time in Service (TIS): 40
- Time in Grade (TIG): 60
- Decorations: 25
- Total points Possible: 460
- So because everyone gets 135 on EPR, it boils down to the test
- Only top % will get promoted. So even people with 100s don’t get reported.
<!--StartFragment-->
Enlisted Promotion System “Stripes for Exceptional Performers” (STEP)
- E-5 SSgt through E7 (MSgt)
- For those infidivual pertormance and not poor test taking skill.
- Put together a package
- Very rare option
<!--StartFragment-->
Enlisted Promotion System “Whole Person Concept”
<!--EndFragment-->
- <!--StartFragment-->
E-8 SMSgt thorugh E9 CMSgt
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Senior NCO Promotion “Whole Person Concept”
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
EPR points: 135
Supervisory exam: 100
Time in service TIS: 25
Time in grade TIG: 60
Decorations: 25
Central Board score: 450
Total possible points: 795
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
State an officer’s responsibilities to subordinates in the career progression system<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
- Career development counseling
- Seek out additional duties
- Provide time for self-development
- Correct deficiencies
- Recognize outststanding contributions and achievements
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Describe the different types of performance reports and uses for each<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707
- Records an officer’s performance over a specific period
- Make up the cumulative record of performance.
- Weigh heavily both in promotion board’s deliberations and in the senior rater’s recommendation for promotion.
- Brief description of unit mission, job description, & short narrative to document most significant achievements and impact on the unit mission.
- Several factors rated: “Meets Standards” / “Does Not Meet Standards.”
Education / Training Report, AF Form 475
- Used for training of 8 weeks or more (typically)
- Filed under completion, interruption, or elimination from training
- (goes in official records)
Letter of Evaluation, AF Form 77
- Used when ratee is away from reporting official
- CRO with less than 120 days supervision
- Under the supervision of someone other than your supervisor
- Provides input to rater
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
State when performance reports are prepared<!--EndFragment-->
Annually
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify inappropriate comments for performance reports<!--EndFragment-->
- Charges/ investigations not completed
- Acquittals
- Recommendations for decorations (awardS)
- Race, gender, age, religion, etc. of ratee
- Drug / alcohol abuse rehabilitation programs
- Previous ratings or reports (whatever happened in the previous years stays out)
- Developmental education (completion or enrollment) (recommend)
- Advanced academic education
- Promotion recommendations
- Advanced academic education (already included on SRF “surf”)
- Promotion recommendations
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Describe “best” qualified and “fully” qualified promotions for officer personnel<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Officer Promotion System
- Desired objectives for promotion (line officers)
- O-2: 2 years
- O-3: 4 years
- O-4: 9-11 years
- O-5: 15-17
- O-6: 21-23
Fully Qualified Method
- Method used for promoting line officers to O-1 through O-3 and non-line officers O-1 through O-3
- Auto promote
- Key attribute: (auto promote?)
Best Qualified Method
- Method used by HQ USAF promotion boards when considering line officer promotions to O-4 through O-6 and non-line officer promotions to O-4 through O-6
- Key attribute: this method is highly competitive. All personnel will not be promoted
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify the five rules of supervision
<!--EndFragment-->
- Get Involved
- Know your people
- Get out from behind your desk
- Show interest
- Don’t be over-involved
- Sense of Mission
- Have a plan
- Share your vision
- Open channels of communication
- Encourage discussion
- Two-way comm
- Open door policy
- Active listener
- Resolve conflict
- Listen
- Remain in control
- Give your people a chance to develop
- Be aware of requirements and limitations
- Match the people to work
- Determine their experience
- Education and training
- PME, Degrees, TDY
- Encourage task rotations
- Be Flexible
- Welcome change
- Establish Standards and Stick to them
- Air Force Standards
- Personal Standards
- Enforce Those Standards
- Excellence Begins with You
- Don’t be satisfied with satisfactory
- Provide Feedback
- Constructive criticism
- Focus on job behaviors
- Praise in public and discipline in private
- Sometimes you have to go off on people to set an example. E.g. safety
- Don’t be afraid to approach them
- Ask for their views/opinions
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify tasks that shouldn’t be delegated
<!--EndFragment-->
- Conceptual planning
- Morale problems
- Staff problems
- Reviewing performance reports / Finalizing performance reports
- Pet projects
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify common mistakes made by supervisors while delegating
<!--EndFragment-->
- Unclear delegation
- Supervising too closely (micromanaging)
- Rushed delegation
- Improper selection of subordinates
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Explain the four steps in delegation
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Define the task
- Is task suitable for delegation?
- Qualified personnel
Assign the task
- Choose the right person.
- Clear and understood
Grant authority
- Decide the amount of power to give.
- (Only) Enough power to do the task
Follow-up
- Give feedback.
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Define corrective supervision<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
The process a leader uses to promote individual behavior changes in a work situation
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Explain the steps of the Intervention Process Model<!--EndFragment-->
- Make a considered decision to intervene
- Identify what needs to be corrected
- Decide if supervisory intervention is appropriate
- Subordinate does assigned work –> leader need not intervene
- Subordinate doesn’t do assigned work –> leader considers intervention
- Cannot do
- Will not do
- Does not know how to do
- Use supportive and assertive interaction skills
- Avoid defense-producing techniques
- Threatening climate v supportive climate
- (you can use a threatening environment but you’ll usually use supportive)
- Correct without disrespect
- Assertive v aggressive
- Assertive is more effective than aggressive. (give reason why you are correcting)
- Select appropriate time and place ((praise in public, discipline in private)
- Avoid defense-producing techniques
- Involve the Person with the problem in developing the solution
- Describe the situation
- Describe v prescribe
- Solution v justification
- Facilitate participation
- Open questioning technique
- Allow time for resistance
- Interact on problem identification
- Eliminate irrelevant issues
- Interact on possible solutions
- Encourage follower identification of alternatives
- Agree on solution and follow-up action
- Include leader as well as follower action if relevant
- Put follow-up dates on calendar
- Describe the situation
- Put the issue into perspective
- Provide positive reinforcement of personal value
- Ask for advice or info about something they have interest in
- Acknowledge the individual with appropriate greetings
- Assign a specific task with limited possibility for failure
- Publically address something positive about the individual
- Refer someone else to the individual for assistance.
- Ask for individual’s opinion on any subject
- Show interest in the individual’s family or special interest
- Listen attentively when the individual talks and avoid interrupting
- Provide positive reinforcement of personal value
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Identify ways to involve the counselee in developing solutions to problems<!--EndFragment-->
Step 3 of Intervention Process Model
<!--StartFragment-->
Describe the situation
- Describe v prescribe
- Solution v justification
Facilitate participation
- Open questioning technique
- Allow time for resistance
Interact on problem identification
- Eliminate irrelevant issues
- Interact on possible solutions
- Encourage follower identification of alternatives
- Agree on solution and follow-up action
- Include leader as well as follower action if relevant
- Put follow-up dates on calendar
<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Differentiate between aggressive, assertive, and passive communication<!--EndFragment-->
<!--StartFragment-->
Aggressive: win-lose situation. “You”
Assertive: cooperation. “I”
Passive: Qualifiers, avoiding, and appeasing. “Maybe” “I guess”
<!--EndFragment-->