M1 - Experiments 0-3 + safety Flashcards
(43 cards)
Types of interactions for solids: intramolecular forces - electrostatic attractions within the same molecule
Are they stronger than intermolecular forces?
(1) Covalent bonds
(2) Ionic bonds
***NO
Types of interactions for solids: intermolecular forces - attractions between different molecules
which is the strongest, suggesting higher melting and boiling points? which are the weakest?
(1) Dipole-Dipole
(2) H bonds - STRONGEST
(3) London Dispersion - WEAKEST
Characteristics that promote a HIGHER melting point?
4 total
(1) Forces - Ionic Bonds > Hydrogen Bonds > Dipole-Dipole Interactions > London Dispersion Forces (LDF)
(2) More Symmetry = Higher Melting Point
(3) Larger Size and Mass = Higher Melting Point
(4) Functional Groups (e.g., -OH, -NH₂, C=O) = Higher Melting Point
(7) Suppose you have an unknown that melts at 124 - 126 °C (corrected result). You make a mixture of your unknown with benzamide (mp 125 – 128 °C) and the mixture melts at 100-102 °C. You then realize that the second measurement is made on a new instrument that has not been calibrated. You wonder if you have a eutectic mixture or if the new instrument has a large systematic error. Describe the possible outcomes and the conclusions you can make if you (a) make a new mixture of benzamide and the unknown using a different ratio and take the mp on the same new instrument; or (b) calibrate the
new instrument with a standard
(a) If the depression remains close to 100-102 °C, you likely have a eutectic mixture - combining them makes them melt easier and faster
(b) it will reveal if there was a systematic error
8) You have learned that impurities will lower and broaden melting point ranges. You have an unknown that melts at 61 - 62 °C. Then you mix it with Vanillin and find the melting point to be 70 - 75 °C. Although the range has broadened, the temp is
HIGHER. Explain. Consider the melting point of a mixture that is 95% B relative to the melting point of compound A
vanillin must have a much higher melting point than the unknown, and/or more abundant in the mixture
9) You learned the general concept that given similar molar masses, the compound with the stronger intermolecular forces has molecules held stronger together, resulting in a higher melting point. Recall that different types of intermolecular forces are still electrostatic interactions of different strengths (but not as strong as bonding forces).
What happens if different parts of the same molecule experience favorable electrostatic interactions (but still not as strong as bonding forces)? How would the presence of intramolecular interactions within each molecule affect the intermolecular interactions between different molecules? Would it make intermolecular interactions stronger or weaker? How may that in turn affect properties like melting point?
presence of intramolecular interactions usually makes intermolecular interactions weaker
lower melting and boiling points
You are told to NEVER add a solid to a solution that is @ or near its boiling point as this can causing “bumping”. What is “bumping”? Why does it occur (chemical reason)?
(1) Hot liquids can form large bubbles of superheated vapor that can suddenly boil over in a violent eruption
(2) Why: a lack of nucleation sites that initiate bubble formation
You are told to add boiling chips to your recrystallization mixture. What are boiling chips made of? Why are boiling chips used? How does a boiling chip work? Why is it not a good idea to add boiling chips to a hot solution?
why –> think about what forms to prevent bumping
(1) porous carborundum or calcium carbonate
(2) provides nucleation site
(3) chips help small bubbles form quickly, prevent bumping
(4) can cause bumping
When you are cooking at home and you boil water, why don’t you need to add boiling chips? (i.e. why doesn’t “bumping” occur?)
because the pots and pans used for cooking have enough nucleation sites on the surface to prevent bumping
what is a nucleation site?
A nucleation site is a small imperfection or irregularity on a surface
You are told that you have the option to add activated carbon (charcoal) to your recrystallization solution. Why is it used? How does charcoal work?
(1) to remove colored soluble impurities
(2) Bc colored molecules have
very large numbers of conjugated double bonds and will adsorb (stick) to the surface of charcoal
—> it is good at trapping other carbon based impurities
You are told that the slower the crystals form, the more pure they are likely to be. Why is this?
because when crystals grow slowly, the impurities are rejected
u are instructed to cool the recrystallization flask to room temperature and then to
0 °C “to maximize the recovery”. How does this maximize the recovery? Use the solubility curve
Solubility curves typically show that a compound’s solubility decreases as temperature decreases
as the solution cools, solubility decreases, compound begins to crystallize out of solution
compound’s solubility is now @ its lowest practical point - minimal product remains dissolved in the solvent
You are instructed to vacuum filter the purified crystals and to wash them with a small amount of cold solvent. Why should you do this wash? why should you use a
small amount of solvent? why should it be cold?
(1) to remove surface Impurities
(2) excess solvent can dissolve some of the desired product
(3) helps prevent them from dissolving back into solution during the wash, maximizing crystallization
A student conducted a recrystallization and obtained a 103% recovery. Assuming all
measurements and calculations were done correctly, what is the most reasonable explanation for this?
2 explanations
(1) Incomplete Removal of Impurities
(2) excess solvent
you are instructed to use a vacuum trap between the filter flask and vacuum line.
(1) What is the purpose of this trap?
(2) does it matter how you connect the two tubings on the trap?
(3) We do not want any water or solvent to get inside a vacuum pump. So how does the vacuum trap help in this case?
(1) vacuum trap prevents any solution from being pulled into the vacuum line
(2) Yes
(3) The vacuum trap helps prevent water or solvent from getting into the vacuum pump by providing a physical barrier
Why is an Erlenmeyer flask preferred over a beaker for recrystallization (there are 3
main reasons)?
- the conical shape of an Erlenmeyer flask decreases amount of solvent lost to evaporation during heating
- prevents the formation of a crust around the sides of the glass
- makes it easier to swirl the hot solution while dissolving the solid without splashing it out of the flask.
Your text (p. 235; 4th ed.) discusses the complication of “oiling out” during attempted recrystallization. What is oiling out and what are the two main causes of oiling out?
Oiling out: during recrystallization, the product comes out as a liquid instead of crystals
Main causes of oiling:
1. Desired compound has large impurity → prevents crystallization bc it gets in the way of solute molecules from finding each other to form crystals
- crystals mp < solvent bp - When it precipitates, it precipitates as a liquid
Choosing the correct solvent for recrystallization is the most critical step for achieving success with this technique. However, some common solvents can react with the compounds that you are trying to purify and should be avoided. The most common solvents that can cause undesired reactions are alcohols and water. In experiment 6 we will perform a Fischer Esterification. Suggest what could happen if you were to attempt
recrystallization of a carboxylic acid with ethanol or an ester with water
By Le Chatelier’s, the addition of ethanol or water would push the reaction backwards, thus affecting product production
***see what is being added, where is it (either products or reactants) and infer that the shift is opposite of where the added solvent is located
4 key regions of IR
Given diethyl ether and MTBE, Explain why these solvents and water are immiscible.
Immiscible - don’t mix
water - polar
MTBE/diethyl ether - non polar
In a liquid-liquid extraction, how can you experimentally tell which layer is organic and which layer is aqueous? Can you always rely on the relative density of the pure organic solvent and water?
(1) drop some water, whichever it dissolves in is aq layer
(2) No bc there are immiscible solvents w/ very similar densities + actual densities can shift depending on the extraction process
In the overview of this experiment for liquid-liquid extraction, washing with a brine solution is mentioned as one way to dry the organic solution. No brine wash is actually used in this experiment, but it will be used in Experiment 3 and later. While the reasons for this are complicated for the isolation of caffeine, can you explain why we omitted this step in Part A (determination of the partition coefficient)?
think about the solvent used and its polarity
brine may have affected K by removing some of the benzoic acid since brine removes water + water soluble impurities
MTBE is sparingly miscible in water
Not all organic solvents are suitable for liquid-liquid extraction with an aqueous solution. List at least three such solvents; make sure each of the three bears a different functional group. Your answer arises from a general rule regarding miscibility of
organic molecules with water. What is the “rule of thumb”?
Acetone, methanol, ammonia
Rule of thumb is that like dissolves like so nonpolar solvents will be immiscible in water while polar solvents will dissolve in water