Materialism & Wealth

Question 1

Introduction

Answer 1

wealth corrupts and dehumanises the poor

materialism creates emotional emptiness

money cannot replace kindness or respect

Question 2

A.M.H.T.M.H.O.B

Answer 2

A man has to mind his own business

This reflects Mr. Birling’s belief in material success, where financial gain is prioritised over social justice
Priestley critiques this materialistic worldview, where wealth is seen as the ultimate measure of success

Question 3

K.L.C.D

Answer 3

Keep labour costs down

Mr. Birling’s focus on cutting costs exposes his capitalist mindset, where workers are seen merely as tools for profit
This reflects the capitalist exploitation, showing how wealth is accumulated at the expense of human dignity.

Question 4

B.T.G.A.J.C.L.T.P

Answer 4

But these girls aren’t just cheap labour - they’re people

Sheila’s statement challenges the perspective that workers are commodities, advocating for the recognition of humanity
Priestley uses this as a turning point for Sheila, highlighting her moral shift from materialism to socialism

Question 5

I.I.A.B.O.D

Answer 5

isn’t it a beauty? Oh-darling-

Sheila’s admiration for the engagement ring highlights the materialistic values of the upper class
Priestley uses this to show how materialism often eclipses genuine emotional connections.

Question 6

N.I.R.F.E

Answer 6

Now I really feel engaged

Sheila comment about the engagement ring symbolises social rituals are more important than personal emotional growth.
This reflects the materialistic mindset that pervades the Birling family, where wealth is the primary concern

Question 7

I.I.O.A.P.G

Answer 7

I insisted on a parting gift

Gerald’s insistence on giving a “parting gift” underscores the transactional nature of his relationship with Eva
Priestley critiques the commodification of human relationships, where financial exchanges are seen as the ultimate form of interaction.

Question 8

E.A.N.S.W.A.T.R

Answer 8

Everything’s alright now, Sheila. What about this ring?

Gerald’s focus on the ring rather than Sheila’s emotional state highlights his view that material wealth is a measure of personal success.
**Priestley uses this to critique the capitalist notion that wealth and possessions can resolve personal