MBE and NY Distinctions (Torts) Flashcards
(43 cards)
Wrongful Death &
Spousal Causes of Action
Wrongful Death
NOT a tort; procedural devise allows family members to stand in shoes of deceased
Family = named in intestate statute
Pecuniary damages ONLY (money deceased would have earned if lived); NOT pain & suffering
Defense vs. deceased = defense vs. survivors
Spousal Causes of Action
Loss of Services: e.g. hiring another to mow lawn
Loss of Society: companionship
Loss of Consortium: sex
Products Liability Theories:
Chart

Vicarious Liability
Vicarious Liability (V/L)
Employer/Employee: V/L within scope of current employment
Detour vs. Frolic: minor or major departure
Things done for employee’s comfort/convenience (smoking break) IS w/i scope
Intentional Torts: conduct advance employer’s agenda?
Exceptions to rule of no V/L for Independent Contractor: (1) land occupier hires IC who injures invitee (painter in store); (2) negligent hire; (3) non-delegable duties (IC doc in the ER); (4) abnormally dangerous;
Automobile Owners/Drivers
MBE: O NOT liable for D UNLESS D on errand for owner
NYS: Permissive Use Doctrine: O V/L for anyone driving with permission (and a presumption of permission)
Parents/Children: Parents NOT generally liable (BUT NYS intentional tort +$2500 (school district sue parent for vandal))
Dram Shop: O liable for torts of patron illegally served (minor/incompetent); NOT really V/L b/c O is wrongdoer.
Negligence:
Legal Causation/Proximate Cause

Negligence:
Affirmative Defenses
Affirmative Defenses:
Traditional: Contributory negligence & assumption of risk: minority rules (NOT in NY)
Comparative Negligence: burden on Δ to prove Π’s degree of fault
General Std.: reasonable prudence, BUT child = child std.; statutory duties for borrowing
Π’s recovery is reduced by % of fault
Pure: exclusively by % of fault (NYS)
Modified: Π +50% responsible = NO recovery
Strict Liability (S/L): Consumer Product Injuries
What are the 4 elements of a consumer products claim?
4 Elements of Consumer Product Injuries Claim
Merchant Δ routinely deals in this type of goods. Traps:
(1) casual seller is NOT merchant;
(2) service provider is NOT merchant of products used;
(3) commercial lessors ARE merchants (car rental);
(4) every party in chain of distribution IS a merchant.
Defective Product (can include a diseased animal)
Manufacturing Defect: aberration/anomaly
Design Defect: (1) hypothetical alternative design is (a) safer, (b) economical, (c) practical or (2) failure to warn
Defect Existed When Left Δ’s Hands
Presumed if product moved in normal distribution chain
Foreseeable User Making Foreseeable Use
NOT limited to intended uses (chair to change lightbulb)
Only Defense: Comparative Negligence Can ê Π Recovery
Negligence Damages:
Eggshell Skull Rule & Collateral Payments
Damages
Eggshell Skull Doctrine: take Π as you find him
If Π is negligent (duty, breach, causation), then Δ pays for ALL damages.
Collateral Source Rule: full payment for damages w/NO subtractions for insurance or other payments already received.
NYS: abolished collateral source rule; Π damages reduced by collateral payments
Punitive: aggravation (spite/malice); (2) fraudulent motive; (3) willful, wanton, reckless conduct
Strict Liability (S/L)
What are the 4 primary S/L fact patterns on the bar?
Injuries Caused by Animals
Domestic: ONLY S/L if Δ knew of dangerous propensity
Wild /Trespassing Cattle: S/L for animals kept by Δ (incl rats)
Ultra-Hazardous Activities
3 Elements: (1) impossible to make safe; (2) risk of severe harm; (3) uncommon in area where occurring
Remember: Π must still be foreseeable.
E.g. blasting/explosives; toxic chemicals; nuclear, brakes, cancer treatments
Nuisance
Balancing Test: whether Δ’s activities unreasonably interfere w/Π’s ability to enjoy land (injunctive relief)
Consumer Product Injuries
4 Elements: (1) Δ is merchant; (2) defective product (manufacturing/design); (3) defect existed when sold; (4) Π is foreseeable user making foreseeable use.
Negligence: Breach of Duty
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Res Ipsa Loquitor: The Thing Speaks for Itself
Π can’t specifically explain what Δ did to cause the injury (barrel falls from warehouse)
If Π can prove 2 elements (inference of negligence), it goes to jury:
Accident of type that doesn’t normally occur in the absence of negligence
Negligence is usually committed by someone in Δ’s position (Δ more likely than not, the cause of the injury).
Negligence:
Legal Causation/Proximate Cause
Is it fair to hold Δ liable for
Π’s injury (foreseeable)?
Legal Causation (Proximate Cause)
Is Π’s injury a foreseeable result of Δ’s breach?
When injury is direct and immediate result, almost always fair b/c injury is foreseeable.
Δ breaches duty, then an intervening event increases Π’s injury:
Well-Settled Quartet: Original Δ IS Liable:
Intervening Negligent Medical Treatment
Intervening Negligent Rescue
Intervening Protective Reactions
Subsequent Accident/Disease
Otherwise, Foreseeable? If NOT, then it is a superceding cause, and original Δ is NOT liable
Negligence:
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
(1) in zone of danger,
(2) serious subsequent physical manifestation
NYS: (1) Π must be parent/child/spouse (NOT even aunt who raised V), and (2) Π must be in
zone of danger when family member is injured.
Negligence: Factual/But-For Causation: Multiple Δs and:
Mingled/Merged Causes
Unascertainalbe Cause
Factual/But-For Causation
But for the breach, there would be no injury
Multiple Δs & Mingled Merged Causes (2 Forest Fires)
Substantial Factor: joint liability for each Δ whose breach was substantial causal factor in Π’s injury.
Multiple Δs & Unascertainable Cause (Quail Hunting)
Burden Shift: shift burden to each Δ to prove by a preponderance that they are NOT the cause.
Negligence: Duty
Duties Owed By Land Occupiers
Firefighter Rule & Children Entrants
Special Duties Owed to Specific Entrants
Police/Firefighters: never recover when injury is a result of an inherent risk of the job (Firefighter Rule)
Children: benefit of the RPP in Similar Circumstances standard regardless of their legal status;
Attractive Nuisance: the more attractive the nuisance (pond for swimming), the greater the precautions of a reasonable land occupier (even if child not actually injured by attractive nuisance)
Negligence: Duty
Affirmative Duty to Act
When is there an affirmative duty to act, the failure to
do so constituting breach?
Affirmative Duty to Act
General Rule: NO affirmative duty to act
3 Exceptions (duty of reasonable attempt):
Preexisting Relationship: family member; common carrier; business owner/invitee
Δ Created the Peril
Assumption of Responsibility: liable for negligent rescue.
NYS Good Samaritan Law: ONLY applies to doctors, nurses, vets.
Negligence: Duty
Duties Owed By Land Occupiers
On the MBE ONLY, what
are the duties owed by occupiers to land entrants?
Duties Owed By Land Occupiers to Entrants (MBE ONLY)
(1) cause of injury to entrant: landowner’s activities OR condition (duty to warn OR repair); (2) legal status
Undiscovered Trespasser: (a) w/o permission; (b) w/o occupier’s knowledge
Unforeseeable Π: NO duty of care for activity/condition
Discovered Trespasser: occupier knows or should know
Activities: RPP in Similar Circumstances
Conditions: (1) man-made condition; (2) highly dangerous; (3) concealed; (4) known to occupier
Licensee: friends or other entrants who enter w/permission
Activities: RPP in Similar Circumstances
Conditions: (1) concealed and (2) known to occupier
Invitee: land open to public (business, hospital, airport)
Activities: RPP in Similar Circumstances
Conditions: (1) concealed; (2) known or should have discovered w/inspection
Negligence: Duty
Negligence Per Se
Negligence Per Se: Statutory Std. of Care
Criminal/regulatory statutes create std. which tort law borrows & violation = negligence per se.
NY: ONLY state statutes; NOT local ordinance/reg.
Class of Person/Class of Risk: Burden on Π to show
She is among the class of persons the statute was written to protect The accident was w/i the class of risks which the statute was written to prevent.
Exceptions: (1) compliance more dangerous than violation (cross yellow lines to avoid hitting child); (2) impossibility (heart attack caused violation)
If NOT per se still could be violation of RPP std.
Negligence: Duty
Who are 2 V’s who are presumptively foreseeable so are owed a duty whether or not actually foreseeable?
Rescuers: injuries to rescuers are ALWAYS (presumptively) “foreseeable.”
Fetuses: negligent Δ injures pregnant lady
Fetus stillborn: no recovery;
Fetus born alive w/damages: injury to baby is foreseeable; baby can recover.
Dr. negligently misses birth defect depriving parents opportunity to abort = parents can recover costs of raising child.
Dr. botches sterilization procedure: MBE injury is foreseeable;
NYS: NO recovery (joy of raising children)
Act of God: always foreseeable.
Negligence: Duty
Std. of Care by Professionals
Std. of Care By Professionals to Patients/Clients
Care that is given by the average member of that profession in similar community
Std. is empirical/discoverable
Industry Std. is Std. (NOT just some evidence)
Similar Community: rural vs. urban
Exception: specialists (brain surgeons) are held to a national standard.
Informed Consent By Docs
It is negligence for a doc not to provide patient w/information about risks
Exceptions: (1) commonly known risks; (2) waiver; (3) incompetent patient; (4) disclosure is harmful.
Negligence: Duty
General Rule: To whom do we owe a duty of care?
Duty to Foreseeable Victims
Everyone owes a duty of care to foreseeable victims of their potential negligence.
Foreseeable Victims: w/i Zone of Danger
Duty Owed: level of care given by a reasonably prudent person (RPP) in similar circumstances
RPP: NO allowances for Δ’s shortcomings;
EXCEPT: (1) ↑ std. for superior knowledge (NASCAR driver = higher driving std.); (2) physical characteristics (reasonable blind Δ).
E.g. Psychologist has duty to protect 3rd party from known and dangerous acts of patients.
Negligence: Duty
Std. of Care by Children
Special Duty Standard for Children
Children < 4: Incapable of negligence
Children > 4: hypothetical child of similar age, experience, intelligence in similar circum. (drastically different standard from RPP)
EXCEPTION: Adult Activity = Adult Std. (e.g. vehicle w/engine)
Inducing Breach
of Contract
Inducing Breach of Contract
Valid contract between Π and 3rd party
Δ knows about contract
Δ persuades 3rd party to breach contract
Results in an actual breach of the contract
Exception: privilege between Δ and 3rd party; e.g. advisory relationship (lawyer, relative, priest)
Negligence:
What are the four elements of negligence?
Negligence
Duty (foreseeable Vs)
Breach (conduct falls short; res ipsa)
Causation
Factual (But-For)
Legal/Proximate (Blameworthiness)
Damages (eggshell skull doctrine)
Fraud/Deceit
What are the
5 elements of fraud?
Fraud/Deceit
Affirmative Misrepresentation (NOT Silence)
Intent/Recklessness
Specifically Intended to Induce Reliance
On Which Π Reasonably Relies
Always Reasonable to Rely on Facts
Sometimes Reasonable to Rely on Opinion if Speaker has Superior Knowledge
Damages Result
(No transferred intent if overheard by 3rd party).
Theft of Trade Secrets
Theft of Trade Secrets
Valid Trade Secret Exists
Trade Secret: private information provides business advantage, protected by Π
Δ Takes the Secret By Improper Means
Traitorous Insider: learned legitimately
Industrial Spying: legal means can be improper if they overcome Π’s reasonable precautions