Media Law 22: Copyright Flashcards Preview

Media Law > Media Law 22: Copyright > Flashcards

Flashcards in Media Law 22: Copyright Deck (59):

main legislation for copyright law

- Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988


types of work covered by CDPA 1988

- original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works
- sound recordings, films or broadcasts
- typographical arrangements of published editions


what counts as 'original'

- author's own work
- doesn't have to be strikingly imaginative, unusual or new


what counts as a 'literary work'

- 'any work, other than a dramatic or musical work, which is written, spoken or sung'
- essentially 'literary' means it's capable of being written down
- common examples: books, newspaper and magazines features, stories, interviews, speeches, song lyrics
- less obvious: computer code, databases, tables


what thing of words does NOT count as a 'literary work'

- anything without substance (e.g. catchphrases or slogans)


what if two works are very similar?

- can still both be copyrighted
- so long as similarities arose accidentally


what counts as artistic works?

- photographs, maps, graphics, drawings
- MUST have some tangible item produced as a result of the work


what counts as sound recordings?

- any recording of sound, regardless of how it is made


what counts as film?

- any recording of moving images, regardless of how it is made


what counts as broadcast?

- any transmission of images/sounds/info to public
- NOT internet transmission UNLESS part of concurrent live event or another transmission


what niche activity is specifically prohibited in the CDPA 1988?

- 'screen grabs'


DEF: typographical arrangements

- way a page is laid out
- protects against unlawful photocopying


why is copyrighting ideas very limited

- ONLY if they are in a tangible form
- NOT ideas in non-permanent form
- NOT words spoken but not written down


where should journos be most careful about idea copyright?

- pitching to editors (although this can be covered under confidentiality)


is news/information covered by copyright? why/why not?

- NO, just the way the story is written
- BUT can't just lift wholesale (e.g. use substantial bits of original writer's words or quotes without mentioning them)
- public interest in news being spread as widely as possible


when (and when aren't) speeches and interviews copyrighted?

- if speech written down, speaker owns copyright
- if speech recorded, recorder owns copyright of recorded words
- if speaking off the cuff, copyright only occurs once accurately written or recorded (words belong to speaker, tapes/notes belong to reporter)


DEF: copyright covering documents published on behalf of Government

- Crown copyright
- licence usually issued to allow small amount of document to be published


in which official information does copyright law rarely apply?

- documents designed to be available to public scrutiny (usually)
- words in Parliament
- reporting words spoken in court


when does copyright kick in?

- as soon as the work is created


who has ownership of copyright?

- usually the creator
- UNLESS created as part of employment, then employer usually owns it


transferring copyright

- sometimes publications buy copyright with the article (known as buying 'all rights')
- can use in any way they please, without further payment or permission
- freelancer can refuse this and give permission for publication once


readers' letters

- if they haven't stated otherwise, readers give permission to publish their letter
- the reader still owns copyright


who owns copyright of photograph

- after CDPA: photographer (this includes wedding/school/family photos)
- before CDPA: whoever commissioned it (so a wedding photo would probably be owned by the couple)


what other area of law is covered by photos

- privacy (if photo commissioned for 'private and domestic purposes')


ways of transferring copyright

- assignment
- licence


what is an assignment?

- essentially selling your copyright, so the work is owned by someone else
- has to be written and legally binding
- regular freelances often sign form, others do it on article-by-article basis


what is a licence?

- permission to use a work in a particular way / for a particular length of time
- licence granting exclusive use of material must be written and legally binding


things to remember when commissioning work

- permission for magazine does not cover your website
- photographs cannot be used again without permission
- sending a commissioning form needs to be done at time of commission for it to have legal effect


what is the most important infringement of copyright for journalists?

- copying (reproducing 'substantial part' of another's work)


how is 'substantial part' defined when accused of copying

- NO set definition
- quality (i.e. importance to original work) is considered as much as quantity


parodies and copyright

- can be breach of copyright if too similar to original
- courts more lenient with political/topical comment than parody for commercial purposes


DEF: condition given with licence restricting use of work before certain date

- embargo


limits to length of copyright (brought in by CDPA 1988)

- literary/dramatic/musical/artistic works: 70 years from creator's death
- if creator unknown: 70 years from publication
- sound recordings: 50 years since they were made
- film: 70 years from death of last to die out of director, writers, composer of original score


defences against breach of copyright most useful to media

- fair dealing / news and review
- incidental inclusion
- public interest
- reproduction of speeches and interviews
- acquiescence


when can you use fair dealing (news and review) defence

- material used for purpose of current affairs or criticism/review
- copyright holder receives 'sufficient acknowledgement'
- amount used is fair
- material already public


what material can be used in fair dealing (news and review)?

- written / spoken words
- film clips
- 'artistic works'
- government / local authority reports available to public


what is NOT covered in fair dealing of current affairs?

- photographs
- this includes any family snaps another publication may have gotten hold of


what material can be used in fair dealing for criticism and review?

- obviously the work itself
- other copyrighted material to show themes of work being reviewed


CASES with fair dealing defences

- Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd (1999)
- Fraser-Woodward v BBC (2005)


Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd (1999)

- Pro Sieben had rights to TV interview with Mandy Allwood, British mother of octuplets
- Carlton used interview in own show about chequebook journalism
- judge ruled this was OK because Allwood had been paid by newspapers for her story
- Pro Sieben logo in corner was controversial defence
- only 30 secs of 9-minute interview


Fraser-Wooddward v BBC (2005)

- photograph agency sued BBC for using their images in report on tabloid press
- judge ruled it was a criticism of work of tabloids, so worked under fair dealings defence


what counts as a 'current event'?

- NOT just events at or near time of reporting
- Diana and Dodi relationship years after death (still news...)
- dodgy meetings, etc, only just coming to light


rules about 'sufficient acknowledgement'

- often doesn't count for sound/film where not practicable
- MUST name the source (e.g. not "the author of a book on the subject...")
- if anonymous or unpublished, no need to acknowledge if reasonable enquiry made
- no need to thank source, just to name


what is 'fairness' in fair dealing defences? what do courts look at?

- about quantity of material used (NOT what's written about it)
- cannot be 'illegitimate exploitation'
- courts look at whether that amount of material had to be used
- whether it impact commercially on copyright owner


BBC v British Satellite Broadcasting Ltd (1992)

- BSB paid lots of money for World Cup 1990 matches, which BBC then showed in news reports
- judge ruled sports reporting was current affairs
- resulted in industry-wide agreements about using each other's sports footage


what if material was acquired in unauthorised way?

- fine as long is it wasn't illegal (i.e. theft)


public availability in 'fair dealing'

- MUST have already been available to public for defence to work
- can count as a number of people having seen it
- does not count if it was made available to public via 'unauthorised act'


what do broadcasters do that can make fair dealing NOT count?

- draw up agreements allowing/prohibiting use of each others' materials


what is 'incidental use' in copyright law?

- small amount of copyrighted material it would have been hard to avoid


what rules apply to media using spoken words they've recorded (though speaker owns copyright)?

- must be direct recording of words, not of another recording
- speaker hasn't said a recording should not be made
- words themselves do not breach existing copyright
- speaker has not prohibited use of words before they were recorded
- person who made recording has given consent


where has public interest in copyright come from?

- NOT the CDPA itself
- courts recognised it over the years (e.g. review of potentially misleading drink driving device)


what is acquiescence in copyright law?

- owner of copyright knows work is being used and doesn't make complaint at the time


what happens in innocent infringement defences in copyright law?

- defendant didn't realise material was under copyright (e.g. wrongly believed material had gone out of copyright)
- copyright owner can claim account of profits, but NOT damages


remedies for copyright infringement

- interim injunction (prevent publication going ahead)
- permanent injunction (prevent further publication)
- damages
- account of profits


types of damages that can be awarded

- 'infringement damages' amounting to copyright fee that would have been paid
- 'flagrant damages' higher to note court's disapproval


DEF: rules about right to be credited for work

- right of paternity
- NOT automatic like copyright
- covers authors but NOT journos (why there's no automatic right to byline)
- if fair dealing defence, author doesn't have to be credited (unless they own copyright)


DEF: rules about right to influence how work is used/altered

- right of integrity
- NO 'unjustified modification', has to be 'reasonable' and not affect author's reputation
- NOT applied to newspapers/magazines (e.g. photos for news)


DEF: writing words in such a way that gives misleading idea of who wrote them

- false attribution of authorship
- doesn't matter if it affects reputation or not (unlike defamation)


rules about use of private photos

- commissioner of private photos has right for them not to be distributed (even if photographer owns copyright)