memory Flashcards

1
Q

multi story memory model

A

stimulus from environment- attention-sensory register-short term memory- elaborative rehearsal- long term memory.

  • maintenance rehearsal.
  • retrevial.
  • Atkinson+ shiffrin 1968.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how sensory memory encoded? and who tested?

A
  • the sensory memory takes info from one of its sense organs and holds it in that same form.
  • seeing is coded iconic.
  • hearing is encoded echoic.
  • touch is encoded Haptic.
    crowder tested in 1993- found that sensory info is encoded in different stores as they have different durations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is sensory memory capacity and duration? and tested by who?

A
  • capacity tested by Sperling 1960 using a grid of letters for 50 milliseconds and asked to then recall 12 letters, showing sensory memory was limited in duration.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the capacity of STM?

A

-Miller 1956, digit span test, 7+or-2.

hold more information by chunking the numbers e.g 074 84 838 207.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duration of STM? Study

A
  • Peterson x2 used the trigram test, asked 24 uni students to remember 3 numbers and then counted backwards in threes, 90% were recalled after 3 seconds and 2% after 18 seconds and duration was found to be 18-20 seconds or 30 at most
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evidence for separate LTM and STM research

A

Glanzer and Cunitz 1966- participants asked to read a list of words and then either have to immediately recall them or recall them after a distraction, and used the ‘serial position effect’, the ppl were able to recall the first words because they’ve been rehearsed and we can recall from our long term memory, ‘primary effect’. and ppl were able to recall the most recent words because they are in our STM. this was first discovered by Ebbinghaus in 1913.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duration of LTM.

A

tested by Bahrick et Al 1975- investigated the duration of VLT memories by 392 American high school students aged 17-74 recalling their childhood classmates anything upto a lifetime can be remembered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

capacity of LTM?

A

potentially unlimited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STM and LTM encoding study?

A

Baddely 1966- asked people to learn one of 4 word lists: acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar and semantically dissimilar. and were then given 12 sets of 5 words from their list and recall either after 20 minutes LTM or immediately STM
-when recalling the lists immediately the most errors were made when acoustically similar (only 10% of correct recall compared to 82% for acoustically dissimilar) and when recalling LTM the most errors were found when semantically similar. found that STM relies on acoustic encoding and LTM uses semantic encoding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluation of the multi-store model of memory?

A

strengths: gives us a good understanding of the structure and process of our STM it is good as it allows researchers to expand on the model, it is influential and prompted research into memory.
-HM also supports as he was unable to encode new long term memories after surgery during which his hippocampus was removed but his STM was unaffected.
weaknesses: oversimplified when it suggests that both STM and LTM each operate in a single uniform fashion, when this is not true it has been shown by the WMM, and shown that STM is not one unitary source but has central executive etc.
-more than one type of LTM, for example episodic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluation of Crowder coding of the SR?

A

-in real life after-images of visual effects (e.g sparkles) offer good evidence of sensory memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sperling 1960

A

-showed participants a grid of 12 letters for 50 milliseconds and after a tone were asked to either recall the row or all of them.
-when reporting the whole grid the recall was 40% and when asked to recall rows their recall was 75%.
-when asked to focus their attention on a specific area more of the grid was recalled.
-this shows that information rapidly declines in the SR supporting the assumption that the sensory memory is very limited in duration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the primacy and recency effect?

A

-participants are read a list of words and then they have to recall them either immediately or after a distraction.
-the results showed that the first and last words were highest
-Ebbinghaus coined the terms ‘primacy effect’ and ‘recency effect’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bahrick et al 1975

A

-investigated the duration of LTM.
-participants included 392 American school students aged 17-74 recall was tested by: free recall of names of as many of their former classmates as possible, a photo recognition test were they had to identify their classmates out of 50 photos, a name recognition test and a name and photo matching test.
-90% accurate for Face and name recognition after 15 years, 80% accurate for face recognition after 48 years, 60% accurate for free recall after 15 years and 30% for free recall after 48 years.
-show that classmates are rarely forgotten once cues have been given and supports the idea of LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Clive wearing

A

-contracted herpes simplex and it attacked his brain and since he has been unable to store new memories or retrieve old ones.
-developed profound case of total amnesia
-he remembers little of his life and his memory lasts 30 seconds
-he still recalls how to play the piano and conduct a choir despite him having no recollection of having a musical education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the three different types of LTM?

A

-episodic -semantic -procedural.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is episodic memory?

A

-memories and events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is semantic memory?

A

-facts and general knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is procedural memory?

A

-skills, knowing how to do something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the working memory model made up of?

A

-central executive, the visuospatial sketchpad (visual cache and inner scribe), the episodic buffer and the phonological loop (phonological store and articulatory control system)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is the central executive?

A

-boss of the working memory, selectively attending to some stimuli whilst ignoring other and retrieving memory for use by the working memory.
-controls the slave systems.
-has limited capacity but can process info from any sensory modality.

22
Q

what is the phonological loop?

A

is a limited capacity temporary storage system for holding verbal info in speech form.
-phonological store holds info that is speech or sound related but is held for a very short amount of time of 2 secs and is known as the inner ear.
-the articulatory control process is a process for rehearsing the info using sub vocal rehearsal and therefore it keeps in the loop, and is known as the inner voice. this is how a tune can get stuck.

23
Q

what is the visuo spatial sketchpad?

A

-is a limited capacity, temporary memory system for holding visual and spatial info.
-able to manipulate visual info, for example you can imagine your bedroom or mentally see things without looking at them.
-Logie 1995 suggested that the visuo-spatial sketchpad could be further broken down into a visual cache and an inner scribe.

24
Q

what is the Episodic buffer?

A

-added by Baddeley in 2000 who proposed it acted as a general store for memories which are both visual and acoustic.
-works with all memory units from both short and long term memory integrating info in an additional limited storage space.

25
Q

case study of KF?

A

-shallice and warrington 1974
-KF stuffered brain damage as a result of a motorcycle incident.
-he had no LTM problems but could only remember two items of info at a time.
-his forgetting of auditory info was higher than visual.
-so he supports WMM as it suggests that there is not just one STM store but a number of different ones.

26
Q

what is a dual task study? example of Baddeley

A

-look at if we can do two things at once.
-1973 gave participants a simple tracking task while carrying out an imagery task. tracking task of following a spot of light with a pointer and imagery task involved looking at capital letters.
-then they had to trace the moving pointer whilst also being shown angles and then for example starting at the bottom left corner of F had to respond to each angle shown as to wether it fit.
-participants struggled doing this as they both used the visuo-spatial sketchpad and when asked to perform a verbal task with the tracking task they were able do it.

27
Q

what does the WMM suggest about dual tasks?

A
  • that we are capable of them as long as they use two diff elements of the WMM.
    -if using the same component for the same task it will overload the limited capacity and cause issue for one or both of the tasks
28
Q

what is interference?

A

-two memories competing with each other.
-the more similar the memories the greater risk of interference

29
Q

what is proactive interference?

A

-when older memories interfere with our newer recall of memories.
-for example if you have moved moved what draw you put your cutlery then the old memory might make you open the old draw.

30
Q

what is retroactive inference?

A

-is when new info interferes with our recall of older memories.
-teacher may know 100 names in the first month and could recall them at the end of the year but when having learnt 200 names may struggle to recall the names of the first.

31
Q

Baddeley and Hitch 1977 inference

A

-investigated whether inference was a better explanation for forgetting than the passage of time.
-used a rugby team and asked them to recall the teams they had played that season and the game could have been weeks or months ago and this produced an independent variable as some participants had memories from longer but no new info to interfere in this time.
-the results showed that players recall was affected much more by the number of teams that had played than the passage of time.

32
Q

evaluation of inference as an explanation of forgetting?

A

strengths:
-most supporting evidence comes from lab studies
-support from baddeley and hitch.
weaknesses:
-effect of motivation on participant research
- conditions for interference are rare proposed by Baddeley and tasks given to participants are too close together

33
Q

McGeoch and McDonald 1931

A

-tested wether similarity effects recall.
-participants given a list of words and had to learn the ten words until they could remember them all then given one of 6 lists to learn
-they were then given a different list
-some of these lists included synonyms, unrelated words, three digit numbers etc.
-one group was not given a new list.
-recall of first list depended on the second list they had been given and performed worst when they were similar in meaning
- so similarity effects words

34
Q

what is a reconstructive memory?

A

-when you forget things or aspects of an event your memory fills in the blanks sometimes with things that did not happen.
- can be based on our different schemas

35
Q

what is a schema?

A

-is information organised into group memories which we tie together and expect to see when presented with something presented from the same schema.

36
Q

what is an eye witness testimony?

A

-an account given by people of an event they have witnessed.

37
Q

how is the accuracy of eye witness testimony effected?

A

-misleading information- leading questions and post-event discussion
-anxiety.

38
Q

loftus and palmer 1974- car study

A

-to test if the use of leading questions effected memory recall.
-used 45 students and put into 5 groups and shown a video of a car accident.
-asked either what speed were the cars going when they hit/smashed/ bumped into/made contact or collided?
- 9mph difference between smashed at 40.8% and 31.8% at contacted.
-suggests leading questions effect the accuracy of eye witness testimony

39
Q

what two explanations did loftus and palmer put forward for their car experiment?

A

response bias- different speed estimates due to the critical word.
memory is altered- critical word changes a persons memory and so they actually see it differently

40
Q

Loftus and Palmer 1974- altered memories

A

-tested whether leading questions is due to response bias or if the memory is altered.
-used 150 students and put into three groups. the different groups were asked -what speed were the cars going when they smashed into each other?- what speed were the cars going when they hit each other?- and the final group did not have a question.
-the following week were asked the question ‘did you see any broken glass?’
-smash had the most amount of people say yes at 16 and the control had the most people saying no at 44.
-shows that the leading question can alter information about the event

41
Q

Gabbert et Al 2003

A

-to investigate the effects of post-event information on the accuracy of eye witness testimony
-participants put into pairs and both watched different videos of the same event which were different. pairs in one condition were encouraged to recall info from the videos they watched.
-71% went on to mistakenly recall items from the discussion

42
Q

Loftus 1979- anxiety

A

-to investigate the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of eye witness testimony.
-volunteers were given different times to arrive at the experiment and were alone, then asked to wait outside a lab and heard talking inside it.
-in one condition they heard a friendly discussion about equipment failure followed by a man with greasy hands.
-in the other they heard a hostile discussion followed by the sound of breaking glass and furniture overturned. and then a man was holding a knife with blood.
-then each participant was given 50 photos and had to recall the man.
-friendly discussion 49% recalled and 33% for the other.
-presence of a weapon had led to high anxiety and focused on knife- known as weapons effect.

43
Q

Christianson and Hubinette 1993

A

-to investigate the effects of anxiety on eye witness testimony.
-survey of 110 people who witnessed bank robberies, bystanders in the bank or personally threatened by the robbers.
-they were interviewed and asked details about the robbery and then compared to police reports.
-victims who experienced highest stress level recalled more accurate and detailed accounts of events than the bystanders.
-higher stress levels means increased accuracy

44
Q

what is yerkes dodson law?

A

-review of 21 studies found that stress performance relationship follows an inverted U shape
-means that anxiety helps to a certain point and then decreases in help.

45
Q

who developed the cognitive interview?

A

Geiselman 1985

46
Q

what are the stages of the cognitive interview?

A

-Context reinstatement- mentally recall the scene the weather thoughts etc.
-report everything- report every detail regardless of the size or importance.
-recall from changed perspective- try to describe the episode from different view points.
-recall in reverse order- report the episode in several different temporal episodes.

47
Q

evidence to support cognitive interview?

A

-Gieselman 1985
-investigate the effectiveness of cognitive interviews at improving accuracy of EWT.
-used 89 witnesses who were shown a stimulated violent crime and then they were interviewed 48 hours later by an experienced LA police officer.
-3 diff conditions- standard interview, cognitive and hypnosis.
-average number of correct statements for CI was 41.1 and 29.4 for standard police interviews and hypnosis produced a 38% success rate.

48
Q

evidence against cognitive interview?

A

-Kohnken 1999
-to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive interviews.
-conducted a meta analysis of 53 studies comparing SI to CI
-based on volunteer witnesses and based in labs.
-increase of 34% for CI
- however was also an increase in incorrect info recalled

49
Q

Yuille and Cutshall 1986

A

-investigate a real life robbery and effects of anxiety and leading questions on EWT.
-13 witnesses to a robbery, which occurred in Vancouver a thief stole money and items and was then shot three times.
-these 13 were then interviewed 5 months later.
-recall was accurate and leading questions had no effect

50
Q

what did Tulvig study?

A

used brainscans on participants and found that episodic active use of the pre-frontal cortex and semantic back cortex.