Memory Flashcards
Cognitive psychology definition
concerned with people’s thought processes and how these affect the way in which they behave.
Memory definition
the process of retaining learned information, and accessing this information when it is needed.
What are the processes in memory
Coding
Storage
Retrieval
What are the different types of memory
Sensory register
Short term memory
Long term memory
Capacity
Duration
Coding definition
The way information is changed so that it can be stored in mem
Storage definition
Keeping information within the memory system until it is ne
Retrieval definition
Recovering information stored in the memory system when it is
required.
Sensory register definition
contains unprocessed impressions of information received through the senses.
It is modality specific meaning that each sensory store codes information differently. It has a separate sensory store for each sensory input.
E.g There is an iconic store for visual information and the echoic store for auditory information.
Short term memory definition
a temporary store for information received from the SR.
Long term memory definition
a permanent store holding limitless amounts of information for long periods of time, potentially a lifetime.
Capacity definition
The amount of information that can be held in memory before new incoming information displaces it.
Duration definition
The amount of time information can be held in a memory store before it is lost due to decay.
Investigating coding in STM (Baddeley)
he gave participants four lists of words to recall.
List A contained words that sounded similar and list B had words that sounded dissimilar.
List C contained words that had similar meanings and list D had words with dissimilar meanings.
Baddeley argued that STM is coded acoustically because when tested participants performed worse with list A than list B, but there was no difference between list C and D. This is because STM organises information according to how it sounds, similar sounding words can become muddled.
Investigating coding in LTM (Baddeley)
He tested participant’s recall of the lists A,B,C,D after a 20 minute delay in order to ensure the information had passed into LTM.
Participant’s recall of list C was worse than their recall of list D. There was no difference between list A and list B.
He concluded that LTM is coded semantically. LTM organises information according to its meaning, so words with similar meaning can become confused.
Evaluation of Baddeley’s investigations into STM and LTM
Advantages
1) This study is a laboratory experiment and so it is easy to replicate as variables have been closely controlled. This means that reliability can be assessed.
Disadvantages:
1) The findings of this study have low ecological validity. The material (lists of unconnected words) which participants needed to recall was artificial (unlike the types of information which people need to recall in their everyday life) as was the laboratory setting.
Investigations into the capacity of the STM (Jacobs)
digit span test - He gave participants several sequences of digits or letters, asking them to repeat each sequence immediately after he had given it, in the correct order. The sequences got longer by one item each time.
Jacobs found that on average we can hold 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters.
Evaluation of Jacobs digit span test
Advantages
1) Jacob’s research was the first to acknowledge that STM capacity gradually improves with age.
2) - Although the validity of his study could be questions, given that his study was conducted so long ago and cannot be sure that extraneous variables were controlled as they would be today (for example, distractions and pps IQ levels whilst doing the study), the study has since been repeated and the same results found suggesting the study does have validity.
Disadvantages:
1) - Jacob’s research lacks ecological validity- learning random lists of numbers is not a realistic test of STM. More meaningful information may be recalled better e.g. learning playing card sequences, perhaps showing STM to have an even greater capacity.
2) previous sequences recalled by participants may have confused them on later trials so we don’t know if that factor became a confounding variable which affected how the capacity of the STM was measured.
Investigation into the capacity of the STM (Miller)
Miller reviewed psychological research studies and concluded that the span of STM is 7 (+/) 2.
If we try to recall more information than we have the capacity for then new incoming information displaces old information.
He also found that people can recall five words as easily as five letters, and so chunking (grouping large amounts of information into smaller groups) can help us remember more.
Evaluation of Millers investigation into the capacity of the STM
Disadvantages:
1) Cowan reviewed research and argued Miller may have overestimated the capacity of the STM. He conclude that the capacity of the STM was about 4 chunks (suggesting that the lower end of 7±2 items is more accurate)
Peterson and Peterson’s investigation into the duration of short term memory
1) Participants were presented with a nonsense trigram (3 random consonants)
2) Asked to count backwards in threes to stop them repeating/rehearsing the consonant trigram.
3) After intervals of either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds, participants had to stop counting and repeat the trigram.
4) Repeated using different trigrams
Results: Participants could remember about 90% of trigrams after 3 seconds, 20% after 9 seconds, and 2% when there was 18 second interval.
Conclusion: Information decays (disappears) very quickly when you can’t rehearse it. The maximum STM duration is about 18 seconds.
Evaluation of Peterson and Peterson’s study
Advantages:
- Peterson and Peterson’s study is a lab experiment where variables can be tightly controlled for example, how many trigrams are presented. The procedure can also be replicated to test if results are reliable – for example the nonsense trigrams can be repeated on lots of participants over time and the duration of STM can be tested to see if it has changed over time (i.e. gone better or worse)
- the research has a high level of control, using standardised procedures to make sure all participants underwent the same process.
Disadvantages:
1) trigrams are unrealistic things to remember. It can therefore be said the experiment has low ecological validity (the findings may not apply to everyday life).
2) The trigrams presented on earlier trials may have caused confusion when participants came to remember trigrams in later trials (in other words, the earlier trigrams may have interfered with the later trigrams) so we are not sure whether the results gained from the participants were due to them forgetting the trigrams or being confused – this then may question how the duration of STM was tested.
- the finding of the study may have been caused by interference rather than STM having a short duration. It is possible that earlier learnt trigrams became confused with later ones
- Since Peterson and Peterson’s study more research into the STM duration has been carried out. The overall conclusion is that the STM maximum duration is between 18-30 seconds without rehearsal.
Investigation into the duration of long term memory (Bahrick et al’
tested 400 people of various ages on their memory of their classmates.
A photo recognition test consisted of participants being shown 50 photos and deciding if they belonged to their classmates or not.
In a free recall test participants were asked to list the names they could remember from their graduating class.
They found 90% accuracy at identifying faces of school friends within 15 years of leaving school. After 48 years this declined to 70%.
Free recall of names of classmates was 60% accurate within 15 years of leaving school, dropping to 30% after 48 years.
He concluded that the duration of LTM is potentially a lifetime but sometimes we have retrieval failure and need retrieval cues in order to access this information.
Evaluation of Bahrick et al investigation into the duration of long term memory
Advantages:
1) This was a natural experiment with meaningful material so has higher ecological validity than Peterson’s study which uses nonsense trigrams which are meaningless in the everyday world but remembering names is an everyday task so Bahrick’s study is relevant to everyday life
Disadvantages
1) It only looked at a very specific type of information- names of classmates. This type of information is particularly meaningful and regularly rehearsed. It could also be argued that not all LTMs remain for a lifetime
2) As Bahrick’s study is a natural experiment, it is harder to control for EVs e.g. if classmates were still in touch or had been talked about since, making results potentially invalid.
The multi store model of memory (Atkinson and Shiffrin)
It attempts to explain how information flows from one memory store to another.
There are three permanent structures in the memory system: the sensory register (SR), short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM).
Each of these memory stores differ in terms of their capacity, duration, coding and how information is lost from them.