Memory Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

Coding procedure

A

Group 1- words sounding similar
Group 2- words sounding different
Group 3- words with similar meanings
Group 4- words with different meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Coding- findings

A

Participants had difficulty remembering acoustically similar words in the stm- we code acoustically stm semantically- ltm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

STM- duration
Peterson and Peterson

A

24 students in 8 trials
Given a constant trigram
Asked to count backwards.
3 sec- 80% 18 sec- 3%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LTM duration
Bahrick

A

329 us 17-74, 1 name with photo, name without photo Within 15 years 90% accurate, 48 years 70%. Free recall 60% after 15 years, 30% after 48 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

STM capacity
Miller

A

Observations Everyday tasks come in 7’s 7 days in a week.
Chunking- grouping sets of digits into units/ chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multi store model

A

Stimulus-sensory(attention)-stm(rehearsal)-ltm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Different types of senses

A

Iconic
Echoing
Haptic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

STM characteristics

A

Duration- 3-18secs
Coding- acoustically
Capacity- 7+/-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

LTM characteristics

A

Duration- unlimited
Capacity- unlimited
Coding- semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Multi store model
Eval- pros

A

Glazner and cunitz- different stores
Recency, primacy
Clive wearing- ltm without stm diff stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Multi store model
Eval- cons

A

Simplified- flashbulb memory
Lab based research- low external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Working memory model

A

Central executive- phological loop(articulately control system, phonological store)- Visuo spatial sketchpad(inner scribe, visuo cache)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Phonological loop
Articulately control system
Phonological store

A

ACS- inner voice
PS- inner ear
Cannot dual task perform both at same time- listen to music/another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Visuo spatial sketchpad
Inner scribe
Visual cache

A

IS- pen
VC- paper
Cannot dual task- badelly driving and picturing radio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

WMM
Eval- pros

A

Dual task performance- research support
Important application to education- development of reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WMM
Eval- cons

A

Role of central executive unclear
Cannot generalise to whole population those from case studies suffered brain damage

17
Q

Types of LTM

A

Episodic- explicit
Semantic- explicit
Procedural- implicit

18
Q

Forgetting- interference

A

Proactive- previous interferes with new
Retroactive- new interfere with old

19
Q

Research into interference
Underwood and postman

A

G1)learn list of word pairs, then a second
G2)learn only first list, asked to recall first. G2) recalled more accurate

20
Q

Types of cues

A

Context dependant- environment changes
State dependant- mood, psychological state

21
Q

Research into cues
Godden and baddeley
Procedure

A

18 divers a)learn on beach-recall on beach, b)learn on beach- recall underwat c)learn underwater- recall in beach,d)learn underwater-recall water

22
Q

Research into cues
Godden and baddeley
Findings

A

LB,RB-13.5
LB,RU-8.6
LU,RB-8.5
LU,RU-8.6

23
Q

Eyewitness testimony
Loftus and palmer

A

Lab experiment, 7 films from 5-30 secs
Asked to guess the speed of a car when given diff verbs, smashed,collided bumped,hitcontacted

24
Q

Eval of eye witness testimony

A

Real world- application- helps police
Indiv diff- older people less acurrate than younger- own age bias
Artificial- clips of crashes

25
Cognitive interview Fisher and Geiselman
Report everything Reinstate original context Changing the order Changing the perspective
26
Enhanced cognitive interview Fisher et al
Know when to establish eye contact Minimise distractions Open ended questions Witness speak slowly
27
Eval of Cognitive interview Kohnken et al
Meta analysis of 50 students, increase of 41% in the correct EWT CO is effective technique Lab study
28
Eval for cognitive interview Milne and bill
They found that CI was most effective when using only report everything and reinstate contex. Took up to much time