Social Influence Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Research into comformity
Asch- procedure

A

123 male American undergrads
Room with 7 confeds
Line (a,b,c) looked most like target line
18 trials confeds gave wrong ans. in 12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Asch findings

A

1/3 of participants confirmed to the clearly incorrect majority
75% conformed on at least 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Variables affecting conformity

A

Group size- 4 optimal
Unanimity- one other gave a different answer from others - comf. Dropped
Difficulty- conformity increased if simi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Eval of Asch

A

Artificial situation
Ethical issues
Research support- Lucas eat al, conformed more to harder question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explanations of conformity

A

Normative- fit in
Informational- guidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Type of conformity

A

Compliance- fit in
Identification- public/priv acceptance
Internalisation- public/priv beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eval of explanations of conformity

A

Indiv diff- does not predict conformity- Affiliators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Confirming to social roles
Zimbardo procedure

A

21 male student volunteers
Randomly assigned role
De-individualism
Encouraged to identify with role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conforming to social roles
Zimbardo findings

A

One prisoner released for showing signs of Anxiety/ depression
One prisoner went on hunger strike
Ended after 6 not 14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conforming to social roles
Zimbardo Eval

A

Abu Ghraib- real life example US soldiers- human rights violations
Ethics- consent, protection from harm
Lack of realism- based on stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research into obedience
Milgram- procedure

A

A teacher(vol) a student(confed)
Ask a series of questions learner answered incorrectly administer a shock progressively until 450. 40 male

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Research into obedience
Milgram findings

A

65% went to 450volts (max)
100% went to 300volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Research into obedience
Milgram- eval

A

Pay- obliged to continue
Deception/ consent- not fully informed
Protection from harm- feel guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Factors affecting obedience

A

Proximity- closer they are- less likely
Location- genuine location (lab)
Uniform- more likely to obey person in uniform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explanations for factors effecting obedience

A

Agentic state- deny personal responsibility for our actions
Legitimacy of authority- authority figure has power over us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factors affecting obedience
Eval - bickman

A

Bickman- field, New York, 3 conf. Dressed as jacket + tie, milkman, security guard- asked to perform tasks.
Security (92%) normal cloths (49%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Factors effecting obedience
Eval- hoffling

A

Field, set in hospital took orders from ‘bogus’ doctor, phoned 22nurses working alone on ward ‘dr smith’ ordered to administer 20mgof astroten

18
Q

Factors affecting obedience
Eval hoffling findings

A

21 of 22 nurses were prepared to obey and went to collect drug stopped by confed- nurses argued the order was not unusual

19
Q

Support for factors effecting obedience

A

Sheridan and king- puppy- to continue
Hoffling- obey authority figure nurse

20
Q

Criticism of factors effecting obedience

A

Cultural bias- ethnicity of participant
Low external validity- not an everyday task
Hoffling- over the phone

21
Q

Definition of dispositions factors

A

Any explanation of behaviour that highlights the importance of the Indivs behaviour

22
Q

Authoritarian personality

A

Why some indivs require little pressure to obey
Adorno et al- F scale

23
Q

Effects of authoritarian personality on obedience

A

Aborno at al argued people with an AR, sow respect for aurthority - more likely to take orders

24
Q

Adorno et al research

A

Interviewed 2000 former nazi soldiers
Used the f scale, measure response of questions,

25
Authoritarian personality eval Elms and Milgram
20 ‘obedient’ 20 ‘not’ from Milg. Study Completed a personality scale and f scale, q’s about upbringing, -higher levels of AP among obedient.
26
Eval of aborno et al
Culture and gender bias Generalisability issues
27
Types of locus of control
Internal- I can control External- I can’t control
28
Research into LoC Oliner and Oliner
Interviewed two groups of non-Jews who lived through holocaust in Germ. 406- rescued Jews, 126 didn’t. ‘Rescuers’ more likely to be internal
29
Social support Obedience, conformity
Obedience- reduced by one other dissenting partner Conformity- reduced by a dissenting peer
30
LoC eval
Cultural bias Not precise
31
What needs to happen for social change to take place
Consistency Commitment Flexibility
32
Eval of consistency Moscivici
All female, shown 36 blue slides G1- confeds all answered green G2- confeds answered blue+green 8.42% yielded to G1 1.25% to G2
33
Flexibility eval
Groups of 4, ski lift accident. 1 confed. Con1)argued for low comp. Inflexible Con2)argued for low comp. Flexible Inflexible no effect, flexible more likely
34
Stages for ‘conversion’ Draw attention to an issue
Evidence that people who brought about change had a internal LoC, r.g. Rosa parks
35
Stages for ‘conversion’ Cognitive conflict
Creates conflict in the minds of the majority between what is currently believed and what the minority believes. E.g. recycling
36
Stages for conversion Consistency
Moscovici
37
Stages for conversion Augmentation principle
Minority suffers for its views, e.g. feminism/suffragettes
38
Stages for conversion Snowball effect
Initially small, spreads until large scale social change. Martin Luther king, 1964 civil rights act passed
39
Stages of conversion Social cryptomnesia
Becomes part of the norm, recycling
40
Eval for social change
Moscovici People still resist social change People don’t like yo be associated with stereotypes of some groups
41
Eval for social change Deeper processing
May not play role in how minorities bring about change. Mackie- majority influence,to believe people think same way, if diff forced to think about views