Social Influence Flashcards
(41 cards)
Research into comformity
Asch- procedure
123 male American undergrads
Room with 7 confeds
Line (a,b,c) looked most like target line
18 trials confeds gave wrong ans. in 12
Asch findings
1/3 of participants confirmed to the clearly incorrect majority
75% conformed on at least 1
Variables affecting conformity
Group size- 4 optimal
Unanimity- one other gave a different answer from others - comf. Dropped
Difficulty- conformity increased if simi.
Eval of Asch
Artificial situation
Ethical issues
Research support- Lucas eat al, conformed more to harder question
Explanations of conformity
Normative- fit in
Informational- guidance
Type of conformity
Compliance- fit in
Identification- public/priv acceptance
Internalisation- public/priv beliefs
Eval of explanations of conformity
Indiv diff- does not predict conformity- Affiliators
Confirming to social roles
Zimbardo procedure
21 male student volunteers
Randomly assigned role
De-individualism
Encouraged to identify with role
Conforming to social roles
Zimbardo findings
One prisoner released for showing signs of Anxiety/ depression
One prisoner went on hunger strike
Ended after 6 not 14
Conforming to social roles
Zimbardo Eval
Abu Ghraib- real life example US soldiers- human rights violations
Ethics- consent, protection from harm
Lack of realism- based on stereotypes
Research into obedience
Milgram- procedure
A teacher(vol) a student(confed)
Ask a series of questions learner answered incorrectly administer a shock progressively until 450. 40 male
Research into obedience
Milgram findings
65% went to 450volts (max)
100% went to 300volts
Research into obedience
Milgram- eval
Pay- obliged to continue
Deception/ consent- not fully informed
Protection from harm- feel guilty
Factors affecting obedience
Proximity- closer they are- less likely
Location- genuine location (lab)
Uniform- more likely to obey person in uniform
Explanations for factors effecting obedience
Agentic state- deny personal responsibility for our actions
Legitimacy of authority- authority figure has power over us
Factors affecting obedience
Eval - bickman
Bickman- field, New York, 3 conf. Dressed as jacket + tie, milkman, security guard- asked to perform tasks.
Security (92%) normal cloths (49%)
Factors effecting obedience
Eval- hoffling
Field, set in hospital took orders from ‘bogus’ doctor, phoned 22nurses working alone on ward ‘dr smith’ ordered to administer 20mgof astroten
Factors affecting obedience
Eval hoffling findings
21 of 22 nurses were prepared to obey and went to collect drug stopped by confed- nurses argued the order was not unusual
Support for factors effecting obedience
Sheridan and king- puppy- to continue
Hoffling- obey authority figure nurse
Criticism of factors effecting obedience
Cultural bias- ethnicity of participant
Low external validity- not an everyday task
Hoffling- over the phone
Definition of dispositions factors
Any explanation of behaviour that highlights the importance of the Indivs behaviour
Authoritarian personality
Why some indivs require little pressure to obey
Adorno et al- F scale
Effects of authoritarian personality on obedience
Aborno at al argued people with an AR, sow respect for aurthority - more likely to take orders
Adorno et al research
Interviewed 2000 former nazi soldiers
Used the f scale, measure response of questions,