memory Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

coding

A

-baddeley 1966 acoustic and semantic
-acoustically similar words or disimilar
-semantically similar or disimilar words
-immediate recall worse with acoustically similar
-recall after 20 mins worse with semantically similar words
-STM is acoustic
-LTM is semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

capacity- testing digit span

A

-Jacobs 1887
-4 digits read, increase until they cannot recall order
-final number= digit span
-avg 9.3 numbers and 7.3 letters in correct order immediately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

capacity- magic number

A

-Miller 1956
-noted that things in everyday come in 7s, days of week, deadly sins etc
-span of STM about 7 items plus or minus 2, but is increased by chunking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

duration- STM

A

-Peterson and Peterson 1959 consonant syllables
-24 students given consonant syllable to recall and a 3 digit number to count backwards from
retention intervals; 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 secs
-after 3 secs avg recall about 80%, after 18 secs 3%
-STM duration without rehearsal is about 18 secs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

duration-LTM

A

-Bahrick et al 1975 yearbook photos
-pps were 392 americans age 17-74
1.recognition test (50 photos from high school yearbook)
2.free recall test (pps listed names of their graduating class)
-recognition test= 90% after 15years, 70% after 48years
free recall= 60% after 15 years, 30% after 48years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MSMM- what is it?

A

-Atkinson and Shiffrin 1968
-describes how info flows through the memory system
-memory made of 3 stores linked by processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MSMM- sensory register

A

-all stimuli from environment pass to SR, this is made up of 5 stores for each sense
-coding-specific, depends on sense (visual in iconic, acoustic in echoic)
-duration- very brief, less than half a second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

transfer from SR to STM

A

info passes further into memory only if attention is paid to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MSMM- STM

A

-limited capacity store of temporary duration
-coding-acoustic (based on sound)
-duration- about 18 secs unless rehearsed
-capacity- between 5 and 9 (7+/-2) items before some forgetting occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MSMM- transfer from STM to LTM

A

-maintenance rehearsal occurs when we repeat material to ourselves.
-we can keep info in STM as long as we rehearse it
-if we rehearse long enough it passes to LTM (prolonged rehearsal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MSMM-LTM

A

-permanent memory store
-coding- mostly semantic
-duration-potentially a lifetime
-capacity-potentially unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MSMM- retrieval from LTM

A

-when we want to recall info from LTM it has to be transferred back to STM by retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

types of LTM- episodic

A

-stores events from our life
-like a diary of personal experiences
-complex
-they are time stamped- you remember when they happened and how they relate in time
-involve several elements
-have to make conscious effort to recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of LTM-semantic

A

-stores our knowledge of the world
-e.g. taste of an orange, meaning of a word
-not time stamped, we do not remember when we first heard about them
-less personal and more facts that we all share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

types of LTM- procedural

A

-stores memory for action and skills
-e.g. driving a car
-recall without awareness or effort
-become automatic with practice
-explaining step by step is difficult because you do it without conscious awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WMM- what is it?

A

-a model of STM
-concerned with mental space that is active e.g. when doing maths or comprehending language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

WMM- central executive

A

-allocates subsystems
-supervisory role- monitors incoming data and allocates subsystems to tasks
-very limited storage capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

WMM- phonological loop

A

-deals with auditory info and preserves the order in which info arrives, subdivided into;
-phonological store= stores words you hear
-articulatory process=allows maintenance rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

WMM- visuo spatial sketchpad

A

-stores visual and spatial info when required
-Logie 1995 subdivided it into;
-visual cache=stores visual data
-inner scribe=records arrangement of objects in visual field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

WMM- episodic buffer

A

-added in 2000
-temporary info store
-integrates visual, spatial and verbal info from other stores
-maintains sense of time sequencing- recording events that are happening
-links to LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

if LTM can be unlimited, why do we forget?

A

possible info was never stored or the actual memory trace has disappeared
-or it is there but not accessible due to lack of cues

22
Q

what are cues

A

-things that serve as a reminder
-may be environmental cues or mental state

23
Q

what is retrieval failure?

A

-occurs due to absence of cues
-explanation for forgetting based on idea that the memory is there but not acsessible

24
Q

retrieval failure- encoding specificity principle

A

-Tulving and thompson
-memory most effective if info present at encoding also present as retrieval
-ESprinciple states the cue doesn’t have to be exactly right but close the cue is to original item, the better

25
retrieval failure-context dependent forgetting
-most likely to forget in different context -therefore a cue would be to go back to the place or visualise it -
26
context dependent forgetting study- retrieval failure
-Godden and Baddeley -scuber divers learn words under water or on ground -tested on land or under water, 4 conditions -highest recall occured when context of learning same as retrieval
27
retrieval failure- state dependent forgetting
-likely to forget if not in same physical, physiological or mental state in which memory took place -cue is to recreate the state
28
state dependent forgetting study- retrieval failure
-Goodwin et al -male volunteers remember list of words drunk or sober -asked to recall after 24 hours when sober or drunk- 4 conditions -more recalled in same state
29
what is interference
-explanation for forgetting in terms of one memory disrupting ability to recall another -most likely when memories are similar -
30
proactive interference
-past learning interferes with current attempts to learn
31
retroactive interference
-current learning interferes with past learning
32
proactive interference- study
-benton underwood -analysed findings from many studies when pps have to learn a series of word lists they do not leearn words encountered later as well as the ones earlier in the list -if pps memorised 10 or more lists, remembered 20% after 24hours -if only learned one list, recall was over 70%
33
retroactive interference- study
-george muller -list of nonsense syllables to learn for 6mins -after retention interval, asked to recall -performance worse if pps been given interview task in between learning and recall -interviewing task produced RI
34
ewt- misleading info- loftus+palmer leading questions- procedure
1974 -45 students watch clips of car accidents, answer critical questions about speed 'about how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?' -given a different verb, 'contacted' 'smashed' 'bumped'
35
ewt- misleading info- loftus+palmer leading questions- findings
-verb 'contacted' produced mean estimate 31.8, smashed was 40.5 -leading question biased eyewitness recall of an event -smashed suggests faster speed
36
why do leading questions affect EWT?
1.response bias explanantion- wording doesnt effect memory, only answer 2.substitution explanation- wording effects memory, interfering with original memory
37
ewt- misleading info-gabbert et al- post event discussion- procedure
-paired pps watch vid of same crime, filmed so they seen different aspects -they then discussed the vid before a test of their recall
38
ewt- misleading info- gabbert et al- post event discussion- findings
-71% wrongly recalled aspects they did not see but heard in the discussion -control group (no discussion and no errors) -evidence of memory conformity
39
why does post event info affect EWT
1.mem contamination- after discussion they mix info with own mems 2.mem conformity- witnesses go along with each other for social approval or because they believe other person is right
40
ewt- anxiety- johnson and scott - anxiety has a negative effect- procedure
-pps in waiting room before what they believe to be lab study -low a condition=heard casual convo and saw man walk through pen w grease lhigh a condition=heated argument, breaking glass, knife in blood creates weapon focus -asked to pick man out of 50 photos
41
ewt-anxiety-johnson and scott- anxiety has neg effect- findings
-49% of pps in low a condition, 33% in high a pps able to identify man -tunnel theory of mem argues people have enhanced mem of central events -weapon focus as a result of anxiety can have this effect
42
ewt-anxiety-yuille and cutshall- anxiety has pos effect- procedure
-actual crime gun shop owner shot thief dead -13/21 witness agreed to take part -interviewed 4/5 month after -info recalled compared to police interviews at the time -witnesses rate how stressed they felt at time of incident
43
ewt- anxiety- yuille and cutshall- anxiety has pos effect- findings
-witnesses very accurate, little change after 5 month -some details such as age height less accurate -pps who reported higher stress were more accurate 88% compared to 75% -anxiety may enhance ewt in real world events
44
ewt- anxiety- explaining contradictory findings
-inverted U theory= Yerkes and Dobson 1908-relationship between mem and stress is an inverted U -affects memory= Deffenbacher 1983- reviewed 21 studies of ewt with opposite findings- he suggestes u curve effect could explain this
45
cognitive interview- introduction
-Fisher and Geiselman 1992- said ewt could be improved by using techniques to improve how memory works -foundation in cog psychology -understanding established in the interview
46
cognitive interview- technique 1- report everything
-every detail -even if small or not confident -trivial details may trigger other memories
47
cognitive interview- technique 2- reinstate the context
-return to original crime scene in mind -imagine environment and emotions -based on context dependent forgetting -cues may trigger recall
48
cognitive interview- technique 3- reverse the order
-events recalled in diff order -prevents people basing on expectations -also prevents dishonesty as harder to lie
49
cognitive interview- technique 4- change perspective
-recall from another persons perspective -prevents influence of expectations or schema (packages of info developed through experience)
50
enhanced cognitive interview
-Fisher et al 1987 -added more elements -focus on social dynamics of interaction (knowing when to relinquish eye contact) -also reduce eyewitness anxiety and minimising distractions asking open ended questions and getting them to speak slowly