Memory Flashcards
What is the Sensory Register? (Sensory Store)
- how it works
- environmental stimuli ( the sound of someone talking) enter the sensory register, comprising five separate stores for each sense
- the primary stores are iconic (for visual information, initially encoded visually) and echoic (for sound-based information, initially encoded acoustically).
sensory store coding
depending on the sense that is picked up - e.g. visual, auditory or tactile. (modality specific)
sensory store duration
less than half a second
sensory store capacity
huge capacity (millions or receptors)
What is Short-term memory (STM)?
Short term memory is your memory for immediate events. It temporarily stores information received from the sensory register.
How is information transferred from the sensory register to Short term memory?
attention
What happens if information is not attended to when it enters the sensory register?
leads to spontaneous decay
STM coding, capacity and duration
Coding: acoustically (Baddely 1966)
Capacity: 5-9 items (Miller 1946)
Duration: 18-30 seconds unless it is rehearsed (Peterson and Peterson 1959)
How is information transferred from STM to LTM?
prolonged rehearsal e.g. verbally repeating a telephone number
How is information transferred from LTM to STM?
retrieval
LTM coding, capcity and duration
Coding: Semantically (Baddeley 1966)
Capacity: potentially unlimited.
Duration: lifetime (Bahrick 1975)
Baddely (1966) on coding in STM and LTM
- procedure
LABORATORY EXPERIMENT
- participants were given four sets of words to learn
- acoustically similar words (cat, cap, can) or dissimilar (pit, few, cow)
- semantically similar (great, large, big) or dissimilar (good, huge, hot).
- they were required to recall the words in the original order either immediately (testing STM) or after a 20-minute delay (testing LTM)
Baddely (1966) on coding in STM and LTM
- findings
- immediate recall worse with acoustically similar words -> indicates acoustic coding in short-term memory (STM)
- recall after 20 minutes worse with semantically similar words -> suggests semantic encoding in long-term memory (LTM)
Why was immediate recall worse with acoustically similar words?
STM causing acoustic confusion and becoming distracted by sounds of words thus not recalling in order
Why was prolonged recall worse with semantically similar words?
LTM causing semantic confusion and becoming distracted by meaning of words thus not recalling in order
What is a strength of Baddeley’s 1966 study on coding in STM and LTM?
✓ Showed differences between stores
- showed differences between stores.
- Later research showed that there are some exceptions to Baddeley’s findings, e.g. types of coding.
- However, the idea that STM uses mostly acoustic coding and LTM mostly semantic has stood the test of time.
- This was an important step our understanding of the memory system, which led to the creation of the MSM.
What is a strength of Baddeley’s 1966 study on coding in STM and LTM?
✓ there is a high degree of control over extraneous variables
- A strength of Baddeley’s study is that there is a high degree of control over extraneous variables.
- This allows us to see clearly that the IV (coding: semantic or acoustic) was what affected the DV (recall), improving the validity of results
- This also means the experiment can be easily replicated
What is a limitation of Baddely’s 1966 study on coding in STM and LTM?
✘ it didn’t use meaningful material.
- A limitation of Baddeley’s study is that it didn’t use meaningful material.
- The words used in the study were artificial had no personal meaning to participants. When processing more meaningful information, people may use semantic coding even for STM.
- This means that the results of this study have limited application in the real-world. We should be cautious about generalising the findings to different kinds of memory task.
Baddeley et al. (1975) supporting seperate STM stores procedure:
LAB EXPERIMENT using a dual task paradigm.
- participants engaged in separate visuo-spatial sketch pad tasks - tracking a moving point of light and mentally navigating a capital ‘F.’
Baddeley et al. (1975) results
- Participants found it harder to complete two visual tasks at the same time than to complete the visual and verbal task.
- The greater difficulty is because both visual tasks compete for the same limited resources, but when doing a verbal and visual task simultaneously, there is no competition.
Jacobs (1887) on capacity of STM
- procedure
LAB EXPERIMENT
- Used a digit span - researcher read four digits and increased until the participant could not recall the order correctly immediately.
Jacobs (1887) on capacity of STM
- findings
- Digits = 9.3
- Letters = 7.3
What is a strength of Jacobson’s (1887) study on capacity of STM?
✓ Replication of Jacob’s study
- Older studies often lacked adequate controls, e.g. , some participants’ digit spans might have been underestimated because they were distracted during testing (confounding variable).
- However, Jacob’s findings have been confirmed and validated by other, better controlled studies since.
- This suggests that Jacob’s study has ‘stood the test of time’ and is a valid test of digit span in STM.
Miller (1946) on capacity of STM
- procedure
- made observations and noted that the span of immediate memory is about 7 items.
- For example, he noted that people can count 7 dots flashed on a screen but not many more. The same is true if you ask people to recall musical notes, words or even letters.