Memory Flashcards
currently only contains factors affecting and improving accuracy of eyewitness testimony (97 cards)
state what the response-bias explanation suggests could be the reason for why leading questions affect eye witnesses testimony
that the wording of the question has no real effect on the participants’ memories, but just influences how they decide to answer.
Give an example of a situation that could support the response-bias explanation
hint: what would a leading word like ‘smashed’ change a participant’s answer when describing speed estimates
When a participant gets a leading question using the word smashed, this encourages them to choose a higher speed estimate
What does the substitution explanation propose?
the wording of a leading question changes the participant’s memory .
what evidence could be used to support the substitution explanation bias?
hint: think Loftus and Palmer
in their (L&P’s) second experiment, participants who initially heard ‘smashed’ were later more likely to report seeing broken glass (there was none) than those who heard ‘hit’. the critical verb altered their memory of the incident.
Outline the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s study
-45 participants (students) watched film clips of car accidents and then were asked questions abt the accident.
-5 groups of participants were given a different verb in the critical question “how fast were the cars going when they each other?”
-the verb used was either hit, contacted, bumped, collided or smashed.
what did loftus and palmer find in their study?
the verb ‘contacted’ resulted in a mean estimated speed of 31.8 mph. for the verb ‘smashed’, the mean was 40.5mph
what can be concluded from loftus and palmer’s study? (1 thing)
that leading questions do have an impact an eyewitness’s recall of an event
outline gabbert et al’s study on how post event discussion can affect eyewitness testimony
-participants were studied in pairs.
-each participant watched a video of the same crime , but it was filmed from different points of view.
-meaning tht each participant could see elements in the event tht the other couldnt.
-both participants then discussed wht theyd seen before individually completing a test of recall
what did gabbert et al find in their study?
researchers had found evidence of memory conformity as 71% of participants mistakenly recalled aspects of the even that they didn’t see in the video but had picked up in the discussion. the corresponding figure in a control group, where their was no discussion, was 0%.
what does the memory contamination explanation suggest could be the reason for why post event discussion affects eye witness testimony?
when a co-witnesses to a crime discuss it w/ each other, their eyewitness testimonies may become altered or distorted. Bc they combine (mis)information from others with their own memories.
-define wht’s meant by the memory conformity explanation?
-who also came to conclusion that this was an explanation for post event discussion?
-witnesses often go along w/ each other, either to win social approval or bc they believe the other witnesses are right and they are wrong. However, the original memory never changes.
-Gabbert et al
Whats a strength of research into misleading info?
(think real world application)
PEE
P- findings can be used by criminal justice system
E-consequences of EWT are detrimental. Loftus found tht leading questions can distort memory.
E-this can help police officers to be more careful about how they phrase questions during interviews w/ eye witnesses.
how does anxiety have a negative effect on recall?
it creates physiological arousal in body which prevents us paying attention to important cues, so recall is worse
Outline Johnson and Scott’s procedure used to research the effect of the presence of a weapon on memory
-also mention what happened in the low and high anxiety condition
-participants believed they were taking part in a lab study.
-IN THE LOW ANXIETY CONDITION: seated in a waiting room ,participants heard a casual convo in the next room and then saw a man walk past them carrying a pen and grease on his hands.
-IN HIGH ANXIETY CONDITION: participants overheard a heated argument, heard breaking of glass, and then saw a man walk out of the room holding a knife covered in blood
a) -what was found by johnson and scott? (2 things)
b)-what was concluded?
a)-participants later picked out the man from a set of 50 photos, 49% who’d seen man carrying pen were able to identify him.
-33% of participants who’d seen a man carrying blood-covered knife were able to correctly identify man
b) the tunnel theory of memory: argues tht ppl have enhanced memory for central events. weapon focus as a result of anxiety can have this effect
how does anxiety have a positive effect on recall?
-witnessing a stressful event creates anxiety through physiological arousal within the body.
-the fight or flight response is triggered, increasing alertness.
-this may improve memory for the event as we become more aware of cues in the situation.
outline the procedure yuille and cutshall used to investigate the posive effect of anxiety on recall
-study was on an actual shooting in a gun shop in canada wher the shop owner shot a theif dead. there were 21 witnesses- 13 took part in the study.
-they were interviewed 4 to 5 months after the incident and these interviews were compared with the original police interviews at the time of the shooting.
-accuracy was determined by the number of details reported in each account and witnesses were also asked to rate how stressed they had felt at the time of the incident (on a 7 point scale) and whether they had any emotional problems since the event (eg sleeplessness)
what did yullie and cutshall find when investigating the positive effects of anxiety on memory?
- the witnesses were very accurate in their accounts and there was little change in the amount recalled or accuracy after 5mnths- though some details were less accurate, such as recollection of the colour of items and age/height/weight estimates.
-those participants who reported the highest levels of stress were most accurate (abt 88% compared to 75% for the less stress group)
what did yullie and cutshall conclude when investigating the positive effects of anxiety on memory?
that anxiety doesnt have a detrimental effect on the accuracy of eyewitness memory in a rea world context and may even enhance it
what shape does the relationship between emotional arousal and performance look like on a graph?
an inverted U
say what the yerkes-dodson law/ the inverted U theory states
it states that performance will increase with stress, but only up to a certain point, where it decreases drastically
what did deffenbacher do to explain the contradictory findings on the effects of anxiety
he reviewed 21 studies on EWT and used the yerkes-dodson law to explain the findings
how did deffenbacher use yerkes-dodson law to explain the contradictory findings on the effects of anxiety?
-when a crime/accident is witnessed, emotional (anxiety) and physiological changes (fight or flight response) are experienced.
-lower levels of anxiety/arousal produce lower levels of recall accuracy
-then, memory becomes more accurate as the level of anxiety/arousal increases.
-however, theres an optimal level of anxiety, which is the point of max accuracy. if a person experiences any more arousal, then their recall suffers a drastic decline.
whats a limitation of johnson and scott’s study regarding poor internal validity? (unusualness rather than anxiety)
(PEE)
P- it may not have tested for anxiety. participants may have focused on weapon bc it was surprising or unusual not bc it made them scared.
E- Pickel conducted an experiment using scissors , a handgun, a wallet or a raw chicken as the hand held items in a hair salon video (where scissors=high anxiety, low unusualness). it was found tht eyewitness accuracy was significantly poorer in the high unusualness conditions (chicken and handgun)
E- suggets tht the weapon focus effect is due to unusualness rather than anxiety/threat. therefore, tells us nothing specifically abt the effects of anxiety on EWT