Memory Flashcards
(69 cards)
Coding of sensory register
Iconic or echoic
Capacity of sensory register
Very large / unspecified
Duration of SR
1/4-1/2 second
STM coding
Acoustic
Sound - Baddeley 1966
STM capacity
7 +/- 2 chunks of info - Miller 1956
STM duration
Without, rehearsal, less than 18 secs. Peterson x2 1959
LTM coding
Semantic - meaning
Baddeley 1966
LTM capacity
Potentially unlimited
E.g. Stephen Wiltshire
LTM duration
Up to a lifetime
Bahrick et al 1975
Strengths of Multi store model by Atkinson and shiffrin
Baddeley 1996 : immediate recall- STM worse with acoustically similar words, and after 20 mins LTM worse with semantically similar words. Shows how they’re separate stores and they code differently.
HM case study of amnesia - brain damage caused by operation to remove hippocampus from both sides of brain. Personality and intellect remained same, but couldn’t form new memories. Shows LTM and STM are differeng stores.
Multi store model weakness reductionist
KF’s study - STM for digits were poor when read out to him, but better when he read to himself - shows visual and auditory info requires separate stores but MSM suggests there is only 1. So it’s reductionist and over simplified.
MSM weakness elaborative processing to creat LTM is key
Craig and Lockhart suggested enduring memories are created by processing that you do, rather than maintenance rehearsal. Processed more deeply- doing more complicated things with items=more memorable.
MSM weakness LTM actually has 3 types
Tulvings research shows 3 types of LTM. Maintenance rehearsal only explains LTM semantic memory like knowledge of the world but not episodic memories. So doesn’t support how MSM suggests both STM and LTM are single unitary stores.
Episodic memory
Personal memories
Time stamped
Requires conscious effort to recall
Semantic memory
Shared memories, everyone knows the event, facts and knowledge
Less time stamped
Can be concrete or abstract
Procedural memory
Concerned with skills
Acquired through Repeated practise
Doesn’t require conscious effort to recall
Strength case study of LTM types
Clive wearing - suffered servers virus leading to memory loss. Still remembered how to play piano - procedural memory intact. Couldn’t recall past events and little knowledge of world - episodic and semantic damaged.
LTM types X case studies not reliable
In clinical case studies there’s lack of control of different variables e.g, precise location of brain damage or personality. So other factors might be affecting their memory damage. So difficult to generalise.
LTM types strength brain scans evidence
Different areas of brain are active when different type of LTM is beinf used - episodic:hippocampus
Semantic : temporal lobe
Procedural : cerebellum
Real life applications to improve people’s lives LTM types
Belleville et al. Episodic memories can be improved in elderly with mild cognitive impairments by training which improves memory performance.
Working memory model
Visuo-spatial sketchpad : for spatial tasks - inner scribe and visual cache
Central executive : coordinates sub systems, focuses and switches attention
Phonological loop : phonological store, inner ear- auditory memory for few secs
and articulatory loop- sub vocal speech , inner voice
Later added in 2000: episodic buffer;temporary store for info and links STM to LTM
And LTM
Word length effect research for WMM
Baddeley et al 1975
Asked to write down as many words they can remember from short word list - harm, and long word list - association. Remembered more shorter words. Phonological loop holds amount of info u can say in 1.5-2 secs so makes it harder to remember longer words, inhibiting rehearsal. Limited capacity in phon. Store.
Limitation of WMM central executive vague
CE lacks clarity and cognitive psyche suggest its unsatisfactory cuz it should be more clearly specified . Not just ‘attention’. WMM not fully explained
CE may have more than one component WMM X
Eslinger and Damasio: Studied EVR-cerebral rumour removed - reasoning tests good, decision making bad. CE was intact but not wholly.