Memory - Explanations For Forgetting Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

Interference theory

A

Suggests we forget because long-term memories become confused/disrupted by other information while it is coded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proactive interference

A

When old information disrupts new. Interference works forward in time—older stored info interferes with recalling newer info.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Retroactive interference

A

When new information disrupts old. Interference works backward in time—newer info being stored interferes with recall of older info.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Similarity in interference

A

Interference is more likely when the two pieces of information are similar due to response competition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Time sensitivity in interference

A

Interference is less likely when there is a large gap between the instances of learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Schmidt et al (2000) — Procedure

A

Investigated retroactive interference using memory of childhood street names. 11–79 year olds were sent a questionnaire with a map of their old school area but no street names.

It was found that the more people had moved house, the fewer street names they recalled. This negative correlation suggests retroactive interference — newer memories (new street names) interfere with older ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Greenberg & Underwood (1950) — Procedure

A

Asked participants to learn 10 paired word lists. After a 48-hour gap, participants were tested on recall. This was repeated four times.

It was found that correct recall declined the more lists were learned. This provides evidence for proactive interference — earlier lists interfered with later learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cue-dependent forgetting

A

Occurs when information is in LTM but cannot be accessed due to absence of appropriate cues (encoding specificity principle).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Context-dependent cues

A

Aspects of the external environment (e.g. sights, sounds) act as retrieval cues. If the learning and recall environments differ, forgetting may occur due to lack of environmental cues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Godden & Baddeley (1975) — Procedure

A

Divers learned word lists on land or underwater, then were tested either in the same or a different environment.

Recall was better when the learning and recall environments matched (e.g. underwater/underwater). This supports context-dependent forgetting — same context provides retrieval cues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State-dependent cues

A

Internal states (e.g. emotions, drugs, arousal) act as cues. Forgetting occurs when learning and recall states differ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Overton (1972) — Procedure

A

Participants learned material either drunk or sober and were later tested in either the same or different state.

Recall was best when internal state matched at learning and recall (e.g. drunk–drunk). Supports state-dependent forgetting — matching internal state aids recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Category/Organisational cues

A

Cues relating to the structure or organisation of memory (e.g. word categories) help retrieval. Fewer associations per cue = more effective retrieval.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tulving & Pearlstone (1966) — Procedure

A

Participants learned 48 words from 12 categories. They were tested using either free recall or cued recall (category labels).

Recall was significantly higher with cues. This suggests organisational cues help retrieval and their absence causes forgetting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Practical application of forgetting research

A

Research into forgetting has practical uses like improving revision strategies (e.g. using cues) and in police techniques such as the cognitive interview.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitation of cue/interference theories

A

These may only explain temporary forgetting, not permanent loss of info. Forgetting might be due to over-writing or inaccessible storage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Time sensitivity & limitation

A

Interference only occurs when info is similar and learned close together. This limits its ability to explain forgetting in daily life (e.g. birthdays).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Artificiality of evidence for interference

A

Most research uses lab tasks (e.g. word lists), which lack ecological validity. Therefore, real-life forgetting may not be explained as well by interference theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Bartlett’s (1932) theory on Reconstructive Memory?

A

Bartlett argued that memories are not accurate ‘snapshots’ of events but are instead ‘reconstructions’ influenced by personal attitudes and stereotypes.

20
Q

What is a Schema?

A

Schemas are packages of information about people and objects in the world, serving as mental shortcuts that influence memory recall.

21
Q

What is Reconstructive Memory?

A

Reconstructive memory suggests that memory is not an accurate recording of events but is reconstructed during recall, which may lead to errors.

22
Q

What are Leading Questions?

A

Leading questions imply a particular answer and can influence memory recall, potentially causing changes due to substitution bias or response bias.

23
Q

What is Post-event contamination/discussion?

A

This occurs when one witness’s recall alters another witness’s accuracy, often due to memory conformity for social approval.

24
Q

What was the method of Loftus and Palmer’s (1974) Study 1?

A

Participants (N = 45) watched traffic accident clips and were asked a leading question with varying verbs about speed.

25
What were the findings of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) Study 1?
The study found that the more extreme the verb, the faster the estimated speed: ‘contacted’ = 31.8mph, ‘smashed’ = 40.8mph.
26
What was the conclusion of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) Study 1?
Misleading information from leading questions can influence eyewitness testimony recall.
27
What was the method of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) Study 2?
Participants (N = 150) viewed a car crash clip without broken glass, then answered speed questions using different verbs and later reported on broken glass.
28
What were the findings of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) Study 2?
Participants in the ‘smashed’ condition were twice as likely to report seeing glass compared to the ‘hit’ group.
29
What was the conclusion of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) Study 2?
Misleading information from leading questions can have long-lasting effects, changing memories via substitution.
30
What was the method of Gabbert et al (2003)?
Pairs of participants watched crime videos from different perspectives, each with unique information.
31
What were the findings of Gabbert et al (2003)?
71% of participants who discussed afterwards included information they had not seen, compared to 0% in the no-discussion group.
32
What was the conclusion of Gabbert et al (2003)?
This suggests memory conformity, where witnesses alter their accounts to match others for social approval.
33
What was the method of Bodner et al (2009)?
Participants were warned not to share information in a study similar to Gabbert’s.
34
What were the findings of Bodner et al (2009)?
Participants shared significantly less information from the other witness when warned.
35
What was the conclusion of Bodner et al (2009)?
Warning about post-event discussion can reduce its effects.
36
What is anxiety in the context of EWT?
A state of arousal with extreme concern and physiological changes (e.g. increased heart rate).
37
How does weapon focus affect EWT?
Weapons draw attention due to anxiety, distracting from the criminal’s face and reducing recall accuracy.
38
Can anxiety improve EWT?
Yes – heightened alertness and awareness of surroundings may improve encoding and recall.
39
What does the Yerkes-Dodson law show?
There is a curvilinear relationship between arousal and performance – moderate anxiety improves EWT, but too much reduces accuracy.
40
What did Johnson & Scott study and find?
Participants overheard an argument and saw either: 1. Man with a pen (low anxiety) 2. Man with a bloody knife (high anxiety). It was found more people correctly identified the man in the low anxiety condition (49%) than the high anxiety (33%). This suggests anxiety from a weapon decreases facial recognition.
41
How did Peters investigate anxiety?
Patients at a real clinic interacted with a researcher and received an injection from a nurse. It was found they recalled the researcher better. This suggests anxiety caused by injections reduces focus on surroundings (weapon focus).
42
What did Yuille & Cutshall find about real EWT?
Interviewed 13 real witnesses to a shooting. It was found those most stressed were most accurate and resisted misleading questions. This suggests anxiety may enhance EWT in real situations.
43
What has EWT research influenced?
Led to the development of the cognitive interview to reduce the effect of schemas.
44
Why might lab studies lack realism?
Staged accidents lack real-life consequences, unlike court testimonies.
45
How might demand characteristics affect results?
Participants may guess the study’s aim and respond in ways they think are expected (response bias explanation).
46
What ethical issues arise in EWT research?
Studies like Johnson & Scott may cause distress. Even recalling trauma can raise anxiety, violating ethical standards.