memory - research studies on coding, capacity and duration Flashcards

1
Q

define coding

A
  • how we process information to a suitable form so it can be stored
  • e.g. STM = codes acoustically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define capacity

A
  • how much information can be held in memory
  • e.g. STM = 5-9 items
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define duration

A
  • how long information can be held in memory
  • e.g. STM = 18-30 seconds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

sensory register coding

A
  • modality specific
  • depends on sense used e.g. iconic, visual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sensory register capacity

A

unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

sensory register duration

A

limited (less than 0.5 seconds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

STM coding

A

acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

STM capacity

A

limited 5-9 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STM duration

A

limited 18-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LTM coding

A

semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LTM capacity

A

unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LTM duration

A

potentially a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in STM
AIM

A

to investigate how we code information in STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in STM
PROCEDURE

A
  • showed ppts words from 4 categories
    1) acoustically similar e.g. sat, cat, hat, rat
    2) acoustically dissimilar e.g. tree, house, flour
    3) semantically similar e.g. sleep, snooze, rest
    4) semantically dissimilar e.g. cake, book, plane
  • asked ppts to recall lists iIMMEDIATELY AFTER
  • in the correct order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in STM
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

A

findings: most mistakes made in acoustically similar list

conclusion: STM codes acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in LTM
AIM

A

to investigate how we code information in LTM

17
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in LTM
PROCEDURE

A
  • showed ppts words from 4 categories
    1) acoustically similar e.g. sat, cat, hat, rat
    2) acoustically dissimilar e.g. tree, house, flour
    3) semantically similar e.g. sleep, snooze, rest
    4) semantically dissimilar e.g. cake, book, plane
  • asked ppts to recall lists 20 MINUTES AFTER
  • in the correct order
18
Q

baddeley - AO1
coding in LTM
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

A

findings: more mistakes made on semantically similar list

conclusion: LTM codes semantically

19
Q

miller - AO1
capacity of STM
AIM

A

to investigate capacity of STM

20
Q

miller - AO1
capacity of STM
PROCEDURE

A
  • digit span technique
  • shown a string of unrelated digits
  • increased by 1 every time
  • had to recall in correct order
  • digit span measured until no longer could recall in correct sequence
21
Q

miller - AO1
capacity of STM
FINDINGS/CONCLUSION

A
  • STM capacity limited
  • 5-9 items
  • increased capacity if placed into meaningful chunks
22
Q

Peterson and Peterson - AO1
duration of STM
AIM

A

to investigate duration of STM

23
Q

Peterson and Peterson - AO1
duration of STM
SAMPLE

A

24 undergraduate students

24
Q

Peterson and Peterson - AO1
duration of STM
PROCEDURE

A
  • ppts presented with consent trigram to learn e.g. HDF
  • given 3 digit number and asked to count backwards (prevents rehearsal)
  • stopped at different intervals e.g. 3,6,9,12,15,18
  • asked to recall consonant trigram
25
Peterson and Peterson - AO1 duration of STM FINDINGS
- when stopped at 3 seconds less only 80% correctly recalled trigram - when stopped at 18 seconds less than 10% recalled correctly
26
Peterson and Peterson - AO1 duration of STM CONCLUSION
- STM duration is limited - 18-30 seconds - unless rehearsed
27
bahrick - AO1 duration of LTM AIM
to investigate duration of LTM
28
bahrick - AO1 duration of LTM SAMPLE
394 American high school graduates aged 17-74
29
bahrick - AO1 duration of LTM PROCEDURE
- placed ppts in 2 conditions - condition 1 = recall memory of former classmates with photobook - condition 2 = recall names of former classmates with no photobook
30
bahrick - AO1 duration of LTM FINDINGS
- condition 1 = 70% recall after 48 years - condition 2 = 30% recall after 48 years
31
bahrick - AO1 duration of LTM CONCLUSION
- certain types of information can potentially last a lifetime - especially with correct cues
32
weakness - AO3 lacks mundane realism THINK FURTHER
P - research into (duration of STM) - lacks mundane realism E - artificial task - (recalling consonant trigrams) E - difficult to generalise findings (STM duration = 18-30 secs) - to real life (duration of STM) - research does not reflect most real life memory activities - meaningful information L - lowers external validity of (STM duration) THINK FURTHER - sometimes we do remember meaningless info - e.g. groups of digits/letters (phone numbers/postcodes) - has some relevance to everyday life
33
strength - AO3 high control over extraneous variables
P - strength (coding LTM) - high control over extraneous variables - lab experiment - controlled setting e.g. E - lists matched on task difficulty - shown lists for same amount of time E - cause and effect between IV (list of words) and DV (accurate recall) can be established L - increases IV
34
strength - AO3 high reliability
P - strength - high reliability (STM capacity) E - controlled setting (lab) E - can be repeated in same conditions (e.g. same standardised procedure, shown for same amount of time) L - to check for consistent results (STM capacity)
35
strength - AO3 BAHRICK ONLY high mundane realism
P - strength - high mundane realism - assessing real life memories of individuals classmates E - real life task - may do something similar in everyday life - e.g. finding old friend on social media E - easy to generalise to real life - findings on duration on LTM L - increases external validity
36
criticism - AO3 BAHRICK ONLY low control over extraneous variables
P - criticism - low control over extraneous variables E - no controlled environment - e.g. how much contact ppts had with classmates after leaving school E - cause and effect cannot be established between IV (amount of time passed) and DV (accurate recall of classmates) L - so firm conclusions cannot be drawn on duration of LTM - reducing internal validity