Mental Capacity Defences 🧠 Flashcards

1
Q

INSANITY + AUTOMATISM IS MENT TO BE HERE!!!

A

GO TO NON-FATAL OFFENCES!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What kind of defence is intoxication?

A

Complete defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two types of defences for intoxication?

A

in voluntary- no intent to be intoxicated

and Voluntary- had intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the first stage of the involuntary defence of intoxication?

A
  1. Was the intoxication in voluntary
    e.g. spiked
    medical 🏥
    unaware of the product
    R v Hardie - taken drugs but had the opposite effect was not his intent

However,
R v Allen - did not know the strength of Drug /Alcohol not accepted - still intended to be intoxicated by taking substance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two stages of In voluntaryintoxication?

A
  1. What is the intoxication in voluntary
  2. Defendant must not have mens rea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the second stage of involuntary intoxication?

A

2. Def must not have the mens rea - prior intent or

drunken intent- R v Kingston - would their prior intent make them do it whilst drunk ? - if so drunken

If so it sober- no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the first stage of voluntary intoxication?

A
  1. What is the intoxication involuntary - R v Allen 
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is the second stage of Voluntary intoxication? 

What are some example of an specific intent crime?

What do basic intent crimes get ?

A
  1. Complete defence to all specific intent crime - R v Lipman 

specific intense crimes - murder, s18 GBH , theft , burglary , robbery

Basic intent crimes - no defence- DPP V Majewski- “one With recklessness” - MR

If s 18 GBH is found with no intent to inflict GBH or wound can be lowered to basic intent crime s. 20

However - R v Heard - found Basic intent with no recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the third stage of voluntary intoxication?

A

Defendant must not have mens rea-

R v Parker - shows prior harm to victim so no defence

AG - NI V Gallagher- no defence for Dutch courage - drink Alcohol to do crime 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly