Mental illness and violence Flashcards

1
Q

What did Star (1955) find when giving participants vignettes about mental illnesses?

A

They couldn’t identify they were mental illnesses but were united in the idea that the people described were dangerous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the general public perception of people with MIs?

A

They are dangerous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Did the increase in the public’s health literacy result in improved attitudes towards people with MI (Angermeyer & Matschinger, 2005)?

A

No, it resulted in an increase in the desire for social distance from people with schizophrenia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are peopl with MI less likely to have/get compared to other long-term health conditions/disabilities?

A

Find work, be in a steady long-term relationship, live in decent housing, be socially included in mainstream society, and substance misuse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How effective was the ‘Guide’ in Canadian students in grade 11-12 (Milin et al., 2016)?

A

Those who completed the Guide showed increased MH knowledge and decreased stigma compared to controls.

But there was a big difference between groups before the Guide, effect is not strong, controls got worse on both measures, and improvement only occurred for ‘brighter’ students.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Simkiss et al. (2023) find when trying to improve attitudes toward MI in Welsh school children?

A

Those who did the curriculum showed an imporvement on pre and post on all measures.

Those who didn’t showed significantly less improvement and even decreased on lack of stigma and help-seeking behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 methods of investigating MI and violence?

A
  1. Examine number of patients with psychotic illness in a prison and compare with controls.
  2. Examine records of patients with and without psychosis to see levels of violence in the past.
  3. Examine community to see proportion of people who became violent and psychotic.
  4. Examine aptients discharged from hopsital to examine rates of violent crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some possible confound when investigating MI and violence?

A

Age, gender, social class, institutionalisation, social problems (e.g., social drift).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the problems with examining the number of patients with a psychosis in a prison and comparing to controls?

A

People with psychosis may be overrepresented in prison population.

Violent acts are often used to help define illness.

People with MI may be more likely to be sent to prison.

People with MI may be detained longer than those without.

Likely to be differences in age, social status, etc. between the groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the problems of examining records of patietns with and without psychotic illness to see levels of violence in the past?

A

Violence often used to define MI.

May ahve had different lifestyles to those without psychosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the problems withe examining the community to see the proportion of people who become violent and psychotic?

A

Overlap indefinitions for some classifications and biases.

Measure is cross-sectional - don’t tell us about causal relationships.

Probelms with social drift, substance abuse etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the problems examining patients discharged from hospital to examine their rates of violent crime?

A

Ethics - have to release ‘dangerous’ people.

Now looking at a different population - those that have already been hospitalised.

Effects of confounds (e.g., social drift) still a problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Correcting for what attenuates the relationship between MI and violence according to Monahan (1993)?

A

Social class and institutionalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Bonta et al. (1998) find when looking for predictors of recidivism in MI and neurotypical offenders?

A

The predictors were the same for both - criminal history has large effect size, clinical variables had small or no effect size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Harris et al.’s (1993) findings show and how did it effect the VRAG?

A

Negative relationship between schizophrenia and violent reoffending.

Schizophrenia is considered a protective factor in the VRAG.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Arseneault et al. (2000) find when looking at violence and MI in the Dunedin cohort?

A

People with schizophrenia were 2.5 times more likely to be violent in the past 12 months.

Many cases were due to excessive perceptions of threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

There is conflicting evidence about violence and MI, what might be some of the reasons for this?

A

Some studies looked at people who had already been violent, whereas others looked more at the general population.

Maybe once someone is identified as violent and psychotic they are protected (managed) better than someone who is just violent.

May be some differences when looking at extreme violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which psychotic symptoms might be associated wiht violence?

A

Threat/control-override delusions.

Command hallucinations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are TCO delusions?

A

Threat - people are out to get them.

Control-override - others are overriding their proscriptions against violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did Link et al. (1998) find in terms of self-reported TCO symptoms and violence in the Isaeli men?

A

Those who had TCO delusions had elevated rates of violence and weapon use.

Specifically ‘people wish to do you harm’ and ‘thoughts put in your head’ delusions related to violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did Appelbaum et al. (2000) find when looking at data from the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study?

A

No strong evidence that those with delusions (or specific delusions) were more violent than those without.

Actually found that those without delusions were more violent.

22
Q

What is the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study?

A

Over 1,000 patients discharged from an acute psychiatric hospital.

Interview in hospital (prior to discharge - prospective study) to look at things like diagnosis, symptoms and how they manifested.

Follow-up interviews at 10-week intervals for 1 year.

23
Q

Why might the Appelbaum study have shown different results to the Link study regarding TCO and violence?

A

Prospective vs retrospective designs (biases).

More detailed and stricter criterion for symptoms - when Appelbaum did anaylsis with Link’s criteria, came up with the same results.

24
Q

What did Ullrich et al. (2013) find with regard to delusions, violence and temporal proximity using the MacArthur database?

A

Argued temporal proximity was more important in determining whether delusions were associated with violence.

Reanalysis taking into account temporal proximity into account showed associations between specific delusions and violence.

Concluded that delusions cause anger which lead to violence.

25
Q

What are command hallucinations?

A

Auditory hallucinations that order particular acts, often violent or destructive ones and instruct a patient to act in a certain manner.

26
Q

What was the thinking about command hallucinations and violence before 2000?

A

Controlled studies and literature reviews showed no association between command hallucinations and increased violence.

27
Q

Why might have the studies done before 2000 about command hallucinations and violence been wrong?

A

They considered all command hallucinations as one - did not seperate the violent ones from the non-violent ones.

28
Q

What did McNeil et al. (2000) find when looking at violent content command hallucinations and violence?

A

Positive association between the two after adjustments for social desirability.

Association lost after readjusting for severity of symptoms.

29
Q

What did Monahan et al. (2001) find about violent content command hallucinations and violence?

A

Positive association the violent-content command hallucinations and prospective violence at 20 week and 50 week discharge.

But no adjustment for confounding.

30
Q

What did Rogers et al. find when looking at the MacArthur database and violent command hallucinations?

A

Those who experience violent command hallucinations are significantly more likely to be violent than those who don’t.

This result is still true after taking confounding factors into consideration.

Things that mediated that relationship were:
- Those who have to obey but the hallucination was not recent
- Thsoe who have to obey and the hallucination was recent.

31
Q

How much of the violence is attributable to MI?

A

4%

32
Q

What are the limitations of the Pescosolido et al. (2019) study looking at teh evolution of the public’s perception towards violence?

A

Other types of MI, explanatory factors, and respondents were not included in the analysis.

Used vignettes - didn’t include people in treatment/recovery. Research has suggested this may change perceptions.

33
Q

What were the main findings of the Pescosolido et al. (2019) study on the evolution of perception of MI and violence?

A

Thought people with MI were more a danger to themselves than others.

Over the years, there was an icnrease in perceived dangerousness.

Around 60% thought someone with schizophrenia and alcohol dependence are violent, 30% for depression, and 20% for daily troubles.

34
Q

What personal characteristics (for respondents) were found to effect opinions in the Pescosolido et al. (2019) looking at perception of violence in MI?

A

Those with college education were less likely to than those with less education to see characters with MI as dangerous to themselves or others.

Older people were less likely than younger people to see the characters with MI as dangerous to others.

35
Q

What was the trend when looking at respondent’s beliefs about causes of MI in the Pescosolido et al. (2019) study looking at the perception of MI and violence?

A

More likely to say someone with MI is dangerous to themselves and others if believe cause is neurobiology or bad character.

More likely to say someone with MI is dangerous to themselves if believe cause is the way they were raised.

More likely to say someone with MI is dangerous to others if believe cause is stress.

36
Q

What are the overall findings of over 20 studies exploring the relationship between schizophrenia and violence?

A

Increased risk of violence in people with schizophrenia compared to the general population after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and substance misuse.

37
Q

What has been found with regards to homicide risk and schizophrenia?

A

Odds of homicide for people with schizophrenia was higher than for other violent outcomes but the absolute risk is very low.

38
Q

What is consistently shown to be a mediating factor between the risk of violence and schizophrenia?

A

Substance misuse

39
Q

Why might the prevalence of schizophrenia be underestimated in murder-suicides?

A

Because previous contact with services to establish the presence of a mental disorder is relied on.

40
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between bipolar and violence?

A

Increased odds for violence in bipolar although the ratio differs.

41
Q

Are the absolute risks of violence lower in bipolar or schizophrenia? Why?

A

Bipolar because of differnces in age and sex distributions - higher proportion of younger men with schizophrenia.

42
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between depression and violence and why should it be interpreted with caution?

A

Increased risk of violence in people with depression. Not much research in the area though so need more.

43
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between ADHD and violence and why should it be interpreted with caution?

A

Increased risk of violence in people with ADHD but it appears to be mediated by high psychiatric and substance comorbidity.

44
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between autism and violence?

A

No relationship with violence.

Studies that did find a positive relationship could account for these results with the presence of comorbid ADHD and conduct disorder.

45
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between PDs and violence?

A

Significantly higher risk of violence.

46
Q

What is likely driving the relationship between PDs and violence?

A

Antisocial personality disorder - aggression and criminality are part of the DSM criteria

47
Q

What is the general finding about the relationship between PTSD and violence and why should it be interpreted with caution?

A

Association between PTSD and violence but most studies are done on people in the military - might be personality factors at play here.

48
Q

What has been suggested as the strongest risk factor for violence of psychiatric diagnoses?

A

Substance misuse

49
Q

Why have studies of individual drugs likely come back with inconclusive results?

A

Substantial study heterogeneity, infrequent use of matched comparison groups, and isolation of effects is complicated by different formulations (e.g., crack vs powered cocaine)

50
Q

What % of homicides were attributable to schizophrenia over a 10 year period in the UK?

A

6%