Sexual offending Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

Name some types of sex offending.

A

Child molestation, sadism, rape, exhibitionism, voyerism, masochism, paraphilia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Williams et al. (2009) find when looking at rates of deviance in male undergrad Candians using self-reports?

A

Found high levels of fantasies (68% sexual assault, 13% paedophilia, 62% sadism) but much lower actual behaviour.

Found a strong correlation between fantasies and behaviours.

Psychopathic traits were shown to be a strong predictor of if fantasises were translated into behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Kendrick et al. (1998) find when exploring the origins of sexual interest in goats/sheep?

A

Male goats alsmost always chose to mate with female sheep, vice versa for male sheep - this persisted for every year follow up.

Female goats only slightly prefer male sheep for hte first year btu after 2 years they return to choosing to mate with male goats, vice versa for female sheep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the Kendrick et al. (1998) study suggest about the development of sexual interest?

A

Males have a critical period in developing their sexual preference whereas females are a lot more fluid and dynamic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some methods people have used to try and alter sexual interest?

A

Castration, lobotomies, electric shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the APA say about Sexual Orientation Change Effects (SOCE)?

A

Found no evidence for such changes but concluded that the evidence (for either way) is poor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Freund (1990) suggest about altering sexual interest?

A

You can alter the strength of the drive but not its direction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did McPhail and Oliver (2020) find after conducting a meta-analysis about the efforts to change paedophilic attractions using PPG not self-report?

A

Behavioural and pharmacological interventions show ‘moderate to large’ effects of reducing paedophilic arousal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the problem with the McPhail and Olver (2020) results when assessing paedophilic attraction?

A

Results show that penile arousal to children was reduced - not increased arousal to adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What model is suggested to be the pathway to sexual offending?

A

Finkelhor model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the four stages of the Finkelhor model?

A
  1. Thinking stage
  2. Giving permission
  3. Creating the opportunity
  4. Overcoming the victim’s resistance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is stage 1 of the Finkelhor model?

A

Thinking stage.

Motivations, looks for the ‘idea to offend’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is stage 2 of the Finkelhor model?

A

Giving permission.

Overcoming internal inhibitions, attempts to ‘get around’ this by using justifications or cognitive distortions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is stage 3 of the Finkelhor model?

A

Creating the opportunity.

Overcoming external inhibitions, some degree of planning goes into an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is stage 4 of the Finkelhor model?

A

Overcoming the victim’s resistance.

Only part of the model which is illegal. Use of force, threats, weapons, drugs, grooming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Wollert (2006) suggest?

A

Base rates of sexual offending are so low there is almost no point detaining anyone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Hanson (2002) find when looking at convictions of sex offenders?

A

After 8 years 22% had a charge/conviction for a sexual crime.

Correlation between time at large and recidivism was large.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why is it so difficult to asses rates of sex offending?

A

Based on charges and convictions - majority of sex crimes aren’t reported.

Mnay crimes that are sexually motivated do not appear so on their PNC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Grubin (2003) find when usuing a polygraph with child sex offenders?

A

Increased number of victims admitted to after using the polygraph (500% increase).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Which factors did Hanson and Bussiere (1998) find to be predictive of sexual violence?

A

Sexual deviance, previous sexual crimes, early onset of sexual offending, having a previous male/stranger victim and past criminal history.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What were some surprising factors that weren’t found to be predictive of sexual violence by Hanson and Bussiere (1998)?

A

Being sexually abused as a child, substance abuse, general psychological problems, treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What did Mann et al. (2010) aim to find in his meta-analysis examining sexual violence predictors?

A

Psychologically meaningful risk factors - factors that can be dynamic, causal to offending, and a target for treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What factors were found to be not related to sexual recidivism in the Mann et al (2010) meta-analysis?

A

Depression, poor social skills, poor victim empathy, lack of motivation for treatment.

24
Q

What factors were found to be predictive of sexual offending in the Mann et al. (2010) meta-analysis?

A

Ones not really associated with sexual violence - just general antisocial behaviours.

25
What is thought to be a major driving factor behind sex offences?
Deviant sexual interest.
26
What are the three physiological methods to measure sexual deviancy?
Penile plesmography (PPG), Implicit Association Test (IAT), and Viewing Time (VT)
27
What is PPG?
Measures sexual arousal via changes in penis size.
28
How is deviance defined using the PPG?
Greater response to deviant stimuli.
29
What did Chivers et al. (2004) find when using blood flow measures of arousal in men and women?
Men show a strong category specific response whereas women don't.
30
What are some limitations of PPG?
Probelms due to faking, masking, lack of standardisation
31
Where can PPG be helpful?
Identifying rapists from non-rapists, identifying child molesters from other offenders.
32
What is the AUC of PPG in optimal circumstances?
0.80
33
What are the indirect methods of measuring sexual deviance?
IAT and VT
34
What are indirect methods of measuring sexual deviance?
Look at a person's behaviour to stimuli but do not directly ask them about their sexual attraction.
35
What is the IAT?
Looks for automatic associations between stimuli.
36
What did Snowden et al. (2008) find when measuring sexual associations using sex-IAT in hetero and homosexual men?
Heterosexual men showed assoication to female and sex, homosexual men did to male and sex. This correlated nearly perfectly with if the participant reported being hetero or homosexual.
37
What did Snowden et al. (2008) suggest the AUC for the IAT was?
0.97
38
What did Gray et al. (2005) find when using the IAT with paedophiles?
Paedophiles were fast with the child and sex association, and slow for adult and sex, the opposite was found for other offenders.
39
What is a complication when assessing paedophilia with measures like the IAT?
Some 'paedophiles' may actually be hebephiles.
40
What is the difference between paedophilia and hebephilia?
Paedophilia is attraction to an immature body (children), hebephilia is an attraction to adolescence.
41
What did Brown et al. (2009) find when using the IAT to examine paedophiles and hebephiles?
Paedophiles were much faster with the child-sex association than hebephiles and controls - they showed the same response time.
42
What is viewing time (VT)?
Present pictures, often with a cover story as to why they're looking at it, but really interested in how long the person looks at each picture.
43
What is the idea behind VT?
Look at the image you're more sexually attracted to for longer.
44
What did Rosburg et al. (2021) find when comparing measures of paedophilic interest in controls and child sex offenders?
The only measures that created a significant difference between the groups was the IAT and VT.
45
What did Marshall and Barbaree suggest integrated to create the 'integrated theory'?
Biological dispositions, childhood experiences, exposure to the influences of the media, the impact of disruptions during adolescence and the presence of opportunities to offend.
46
What are affiliative child molesters?
Individuals like family members, teachers, care workers or other men who have continuing relationships with, and ready access to, children.
47
What has Ward's Goof Lives Model (GLM) led to?
Strength-based approaches to treating sex offenders.
48
What did Andrews suggest to assist in treatment of sexual offenders?
Three principles - risk, needs, and responsivity
49
What did Rosburg et al. (2021) investigate and how?
Differences in paedophilic contact child sex offenders (CSOs), non-contact CSOs with no history of child sexual assaulta and nonoffending control group through completing neuropsychological assessments and indirect tests of sexual deviance.
50
What was the AUC suggested by Rosburg et al. (2021) for identifying paedophilic sex offenders through indirect and neuropsychological data?
0.92
51
What was the AUC suggested by Rosburg et al. (2021) for differentiating between paedophilic sex offenders through indirect tests alone?
0.88
52
Which three indirect measures could differentiate between CSOs and controls (Rosburg et al., 2021)?
VTs, IATs and CRT task
53
What did including neuropsychological tests do in terms of the differentiation between CSOs and controls with indirect tests (Rosburg et al., 2021)?
Classification improved.
54
Why were neuropsychological assessment considered possibly important to measure in paedophilia (Rosburg et al., 2021)?
Neuropsychological considerations suggest that brain structural and neurocognitive alterations might co-develop with paedophilia.
55
Were neuropsychological tests alone sufficient to differentiate between CSOs and controls (Rosburg et al., 2021)?
No
56
What were the differences between contact and non-contact CSOs (Rosburg et al., 2021)?
Non-contact CSOs were less prone to interference and were less risk-taking than contact CSOs.
57
What are some limitations of the Rosenburg et al. (2021) study?
Small sample size, classification models suggest depend on distributional sample characteristics, did not include CSOs with a high risk of recidivism, did not include non-offending paedophiles.