Metacognitive illusions a and desirable difficulties Flashcards

1
Q

Define the term metacognition

A

The subjective assessment of how learning works

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the term metacognitive illusions

A

A misalignment between the subjective assessment of how learning works compared to how it really works

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is fluency?

A

How easily information can be learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identify the difference between active and passive learning

A

Active learning involves student participation in problem solving, while passive learning requires students to simply absorb information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Identify the difference between spaced and massed learning

A

Spaced learning requires regular learning intervals over a period of time while massed learning is the continuous learning of information in one go.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Identify the difference between blocking and interleaving.

A

Blocked learning is the practice of one skill before the next while interleaving involves practicing several skills together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are fluency heuristics?

A

A mental shortcut proposing that easy learning leads to good memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the reality of learning in relation to the fluency heuristic?

A

Difficult learning leads to enduring learning and longer memory of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why can it be difficult to assess the effects of teaching methods on learning

A

Other factors prevent a causal relationship from being made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were carpenter et al’s aims

A

To examine the role of lecture fluency on metacognitive awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were carpenter et al’s experimental conditions in the first experiment?

A

1 - Disfluent and engaging lecture
2 - Fluent and engaging lecture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were carpenter et al’s participants initially asked following the lecture video?

A

1 - In 10 minutes how well do you think you will be able to recall information

2 - How organised was speaker?

3 - How well prepared was speaker?

4 - How knowledgeable was speaker?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the self assessment questions in Carpenter et al?

A

1 - How well do you feel you have learned?

2 - Rate your overall level of interest

3 - Rate your motivation to learn the new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were Carpenters’ main findings in experiment 1?

A

Participants in the fluent condition had higher judgments of expected learning performance
compared to their actual performance in comparison to those in the fluent condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did fluent and disfluent ratings vary in carpenter et al?

A

Fluent lecturers were more organised, knowledgeable, prepared and effective compared to disfluent ratings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were carpenter et al’s main findings in experiment 2?

A

There was a positive correlation between time spent reading lecture transcripts and later memory accuracy for those reading the disfluent script.

17
Q

What were Yunker and Yunker’s research aims?

A

To assess whether teaching evaluations affected learners performance

18
Q

What did Yunker and Yunker find?

A

There was a negative correlation between high teaching evaluations and performance in the intermediate/introductory course.

19
Q

What were Deslauriers et al’s research aims?

A

To assess whether active vs passive learning styles affect the learning outcome.

20
Q

What were Deslauriers et al’s findings?

A

Active learning led to better learning, as well as higher enjoyments and effectiveness ratings.

21
Q

What were Higham et al’s research aims?

A

To assess whether lecture activities influence learning

22
Q

What were the conditions of Higham et al?

A

1 - Control group
2 - annotations
3 - Regular note taking
4 - Key points
4 - Verbatim notes

23
Q

What did Higham et al find in the immediate test?

A

Students taking key points and students taking verbatim notes scored the highest.

24
Q

What did Higham et al find in the delayed test?

A

Verbatim scores dropped significantly, with regular notes and key points group scoring the highest.

25
Q

What were Emeny et al’s research aims?

A

To asses whether massed learning or spaced learning is more effective.

26
Q

What did Emeny’s spaced condition involve?

A

4 problems given 3 times, each with one week in-between

27
Q

What did Emeny’s massed condition involve?

A

12 problems given all at once

28
Q

What were emeny et al’s main findings?

A

Spaced learners performed better in memory test, despite significantly high massed learners predictions.

29
Q

What were Kornell and Bjork’s research aims?

A

To assess whether massed or interleaved learning was more effective.

30
Q

What were Kornell and Bjork’s main findings?

A

Interleaved learning performed better and more consistently, despite a clear metacognitive illusion for blocked learning.

31
Q

What were Yan et al’s research aims?

A

To assess the effectiveness of debiasing metacognitive illusions.

32
Q

What were Yan et al’s main findings?

A

Participants had strong intuitive theories, particularly surrounding interleaved vs blocked learning.

33
Q

What can correct faulty metacognition?

A

Learner experience with beneficial learning strategies.