Methods In context Flashcards
(41 cards)
Educational research tends to focus on the following groups and settings:
•Schools (marketing and discipline)
•Students (conformity, subcultures and identity)
•Teachers (attitudes)
•Parents (attitudes and support)
•Classrooms (teacher student interaction)
Access Issues in education
-Permission and informed consent need to be obtained from:
-Teachers, Heads
-Parents
-Students
-DBS checked
Sampling in Educational Research
Schools have ready made sampling frames:
-Past and present students (year groups,subjects and exam entry)
1.Issues in researching schools (1 good 2 bad)
- (BAD) Sociologists may be excluded from some school settings
-Finding similar schools to compare may be difficult.
-(GOOD) Data rich environments and produce statistics which sociologist are interested in
2.Issues researching Parents (PET)
Practical: access to parents may be more difficult because they are not concentrated in one place
Ethical: Some parents may only give informed consent for themselves if they understand benefits of research
Theoretical: Some parents may attempt to manage the impression of researcher by exaggerating support and interest
- Issues researching teachers
Practical: Teachers are constrained by timetables and lack time to take part
Ethical: essential to assure teachers confidentiality as they may be anxious data will be used against them
Theoretical: Teachers may engage in impression management and be unable to admit to negative behaviour like labelling etc
4.Issues researching classrooms:
Practical: The teachers awareness of observation may mean their interaction with students become less natural
Practical/Ethical: There may scope for covert PO if the sociologist takes on the role of a supply teacher (ethical issues)
Theoretical: Student behaviour may be unrepresentative as some may be less likely to open up or use the Hawthorne effect and play up
- Issues researching students:
Practical: Children who are apart of an anti school subculture may be less likely to cooperate with researchers
-Researching children can be time-consuming
Ethical issues: Children are regarded as a vulnerable group and need to be treated very sensitively
Theoretical: Interpretivists have suggest the power differences between children and adults can undermine validity of data
Laboratory Experiments (MIC) (Education) (study and issues)
MASON studied the impact of positive and negative expectations.
-They observed pupils taking a test, and predicted pupils scores
- After one year, he found negative reports had much greater impacts than positive ones
Concerns about using lab experiments in school:
Ethical: concerns with working with children and their mental health
-The artificiality tells us little about the real world
Field Experiments (mic) (education )
ROSENTHAL & JACOBSON (test labelling and SFP) (fake iq test and randomly chose people who done the ‘best’)
Ethical issues: Such an experiment would unlikely be given permission too (however they work the best undercover)
Reality: easy to repeat and within 5 years it was repeated over 200 times
What would you consider using in a method in context question
Practical: (Pros & Cons)
Ethical: (Pros & Cons)
Validity: (Pros & Cons)
Reliability: (Pros & Cons)
Representativeness: (Pros & Cons)
Theoretical: (Pros & Cons)
& Examples
Strengths and Weaknesses of using Field experiments to investigate the effect of teachers labelling of pupils (PET)
Practical:
-(S) Wont cost a lot as schools are easily accessible
-(W) Schools may not accept research
Ethical:
(S)Deception may be necessary, to avoid Hawthorne effect
(W)Deception is unethical
Theoretical:
(S) Interpretivists would like this as it’s a detailed micro level of analysis
(W) Positivists would disagree as they prefer detached experiments that gain a macro level of analysis
However, it could be argued that labelling cannot be studied on a macro level, therefore the more VALID way of studying is the classroom
Using Questionnaires in Education (practical issues)
Questionnaires are very useful for gathering large quantities of basic info quick and cheap from large sample of students/teachers etc
Using questionnaires in education (sampling frames)
-Schools are a good source of ready-made sampling frames. They keep lists of staff and pupils that can provide accurate sampling = representative sampling
Using Questionaries in Education (Response rate)
-Questionnaire response rates are usually low. However, when conducted in schools they are usually higher, because a teacher may put their authority behind it.
Using Questionnaires in Education (Researching Pupils)
Children have a often attention span than adults and so short questionaries can be more effective
Using Questionaries in Education (Samples)
-Schools may not keep lists that reflect the researchers interest e.g researcher may wish to research ethnicity or social class, schools may not keep lists like this
Using Questionaries in Education (Validity)
-The life experiences of children (especially in primary school) are narrower; so they may not know the answers to the questions
Structured interviews in education (reliability)
> SI’s are easy to replicate and therefore large-scale patterns in educational behaviour can be identified (gender and subject choice)
Using structured interviews in education (Validity) + disadv
As young people tend to have better verbal than literacy skills, interviews may be more successful than questionnaires to gather valid data.
> However, the formal nature of SI’s for exams, lessons and other controlled situations means pupils are unlikely to feel at ease and straightforward
Using unstructured interviews in education (Power and status inequalities)
UI’s may overcome barriers o power and status inequalities. Their informality can establish a rapport more easily.
Why may UI’s overcome barriers of power and status inequalities?
LABOV’s research shows that UI’s can encourage interviewees to open up and respond more fully (produces more valid data)
Using unstructured interviews in education (Practical issues) (ADV+DISADV)
Pupils may be to inarticulate or reluctant to talk, therefore UI’s give them space, time and encouragement to work out their responses
> However, young pupils have a shorter attention span so may find long UI’s to demanding
Using unstructured interviews in education (validity) (ADV+DISADV)
-The difficulties in communicating with young people mean that UIs may be suitable, because the interviewer can clarify misunderstandings by explaining questions.
-However, children may also have more difficulty in keeping to the point and may present contradictory or irrelevant responses.