Methods in Psychological Science Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

Theory definition

A

An attempt to explain natural phenomena
- generates testable predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypothesis definition

A

A specific (and falsifiable) prediction made by a theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rule of parsimony

A

Simplest theory that explains all the evidence is the best one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is psychology harder to study than physics?

A
  • Humans are complex (in physics you can observe something physically, but in psychology, it is very hard to observe what goes on inside us in our brain, leading to different behaviours)
  • Humans are variable (no two people ever behave in the same way; the same person behaves differently now than they did many years ago)
  • Humans respond to being observed (demand characteristics, the Hawthorne effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by “operationalizing the hypothesis”?

A

Define what you’re interested in (should have construct validity) + create a way (an instrument) to measure and test in concrete, objective terms (should have reliability and power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a psychometric and what are some key features of a good psychometric?

A

A psychometric is a test or technique used to measure psychological attributes (intelligence, aptitude, etc.). Features of a good psychometric:
- power
- reliability
- validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define power

A

Sensitivity to detect small changes (e.g., 9.58s vs 9.59s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define reliability

A

Tendency to produce the same result consistently (result stays stable over time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define validity

A

Extent to which a measurement and a property are conceptually related. Asks: does your tool measure what you think it measures? For e.g., to objectively measure the property of distress in a baby, we can measure the length of time for which it cries- has some construct validity and what is being measured and the property we’re interested in are conceptually related.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Steps of the scientific method

A

Identifying a problem
Generating theories and hypotheses
Designing the study
Data collection
Using the data to test your hypotheses
Reporting your findings (diff course)
Replication and open science practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Common research designs in psychology

A
  • single case study (in neuropsychology, e.g., Broca’s study of Mr. Leborgne)
  • correlational study (often using questionnaires)
  • naturalistic observation (nothing is manipulated, simple observation)
  • experiments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elements of an experiment

A
  1. Manipulation:
    Subjects
    Independent variable- manipulated
    Dependent variable- measured
    Control group
  2. Sampling
    Random assignment (avoid self selection)
    Controlling for important subject variables (confounds)
    Be aware of convenience samples (may not be representative of the general population): students are WEIRD (westernized, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Hawthorne effect?

A

Participant performance changes when they feel watched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are demand characteristics? How can researchers avoid these?

A

Participants behave as they think they should. To avoid this researchers use:
- covert measures
- deception (debrief after study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Observer (experimenter) bias

A

We interpret data to match our expectations. To avoid this:
- use double-blind designs (both the experimenter and participant are blind to what is being observed)
- standardize data analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why use statistics to analyze data?

A
  • to summarize + organize the sampled data (descriptive statistics)
  • to interpret whether differences in sampled data are likely to be meaningful for a larger population (inferential statistics)
17
Q

Descriptive statistics: measures of central tendency

A

Mean: sum/n
Median: middle value (50% of values above and 50% below this value)
Mode: most frequent observation(s)
Outliers: odd/uncharacteristic observation(s)

18
Q

Descriptive statistics: measures of variability/dispersion

A

Range: difference between min and max values
Standard deviation: measure of dispersion from the mean (how far is each datapoint from the average?)

19
Q

Histogram

A

Plots the frequency distribution of a single variable
Groups data into ranges and displays the frequency of datapoints within each range

20
Q

Measures of central tendency when the distribution is positively skewed

A

Positively skewed = most of the distribution is to the left of the mean
So mode and median are lower than the mean

21
Q

Measures of central tendency when the distribution is negatively skewed

A

Negatively skewed = most of the distribution is to the right of the mean
So median and mode are greater than the mean

22
Q

Measures of central tendency for a normal distribution

A

All values are equally distributed around the mean value
So the mean, median and mode are all the same

23
Q

Key factors in inferential statistics

A

of people in the sample

  • more people reduce the likelihood that our sample is uncharacteristic of the population

Variability between each group
- bigger differences between groups may reflect a stronger effect of your manipulation

Variability within each group
- high variability within a group reduces potential differences between groups. As a result, the data may not generalize to the larger population

24
Q

Inferential statistics produce a p value. What does it mean?

A

The p value gives the likelihood that the effect of the independent variable (results) are due to chance. We are typically willing to accept 5% or less likelihood that the results are a product of chance (p<0.05)

25
Type 1 error
Claim there is a true effect but it’s just random noise. E.g., telling an old man they are pregnant.
26
Type 2 error
When you miss a true effect that’s really there (maybe you didn’t test enough people). E.g., telling a pregnant woman she is not pregnant.
27
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Specific to medical research - informed consent - human research based on animal work - benefits > risks - minimize discomfort and avoid injury
28
Issues with the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-72)
Aimed to study the progression of syphilis in 600 black men, who were not informed of the treatment when the cure to syphilis was found. - lack of informed consent - deception - withholding care and information - exploitation of a vulnerable group
29
The Belmont Principles (1979)
Written by a US bioethics commission following Tuskegee 1. Beneficence (welfare): “do no harm”, benefits must outweigh risks 2. Respect for people: respect for autonomy, need for informed consent 3. Justice: equality in participation in the research process (diverse sample of participants so that the results of research can benefit everyone), avoiding exploitation of vulnerable groups
30
Milgram’s Obedience Study (1963)
- motivated by Nazi Germany’s behaviour to understand why people behaved cruelly the way they did under an authority even if it went against their morals - advertised as a learning experiment - the participants thought that learners were getting higher level shocks when they made errors - the study tested how far people went to obey an authority (the experimenter) Issues: - deception - unanticipated psychological harm
31
Research Ethics Boards (REBs)
- study justification, protocol, full study materials (e.g., consent form, ads, protocols) are reviewed by an expert panel - any changes must be approved (an amendment) and renewed annually - in Canada, all members of research team must have TCPS2 training (built on the Belmont principle)
32
Rules for animal research in Canada
- discomfort and stress are minimized - there are benefits to humans and animals - alternative procedures are unavailable (computer models, cell cultures, etc.) - must be conducted by trained scientists
33
Animal Research statistics
- 91% of NIH animal research (USA) uses mice and rats - increasing use of zebrafish and Drosophila (fruit flies) - the majority of studies (nearly 70%) involve no or minor/short-term discomfort
34
Three R’s of Animal Research
Reduction: reduce the number of animals used in experiments as much as possible Refinement: improve the way animals are cared for, minimize pain and suffering Replacement: replace experiments on animals with alternative techniques
35
Confirmation bias
Humans are biased towards information that confirms their existing beliefs. They ignore evidence that might disconfirm their beliefs. E.g., echo chambers on social media. Sir Francis Bacon: “The human understanding, once it has adopted opinions…draws everything else to support and agree with them…”
36
Problems associated with the process of research
- inconsistent methods/lack of transparency - HARKing: Hypothesizing After Results are Known - publication bias: harder to publish null results