Mi Flashcards
(22 cards)
“category mistake” (Ryle)
When someone represents certain facts/terms/concepts as if they belonged to one logical type or category (or range of types or categories), when they actually belong to another.
epiphenomenalist dualism
(1) Dualism (of some form) is true, so minds exist and are not identical to bodies or to parts of bodies (i.e. substance dualism) or some mental properties are not reducible to physical properties (i.e. property dualism); (2) The mental is caused by the physical - it is a “by-product” of the physical; (3) The mental, however, is causally impotent: the mental consists of epiphenomena - the mental has no effects.
interactionist dualism
(1) Dualism (of some form) is true, so minds exist and are not identical to bodies or to parts of bodies (i.e. substance dualism) or some mental properties are not reducible to physical properties (i.e. property dualism); (2) What happens mentally causally affects what happens physically; (3) What happens physically causally affects what happens mentally.
philosophical zombie
A being that: (1) is physically identical (or duplicate of) a (normal/conscious) human being (ie has all and only the same physical properties as a normal/conscious human being) but (2) lacks any consciousness/qualia/phenomenal properties.
property dualism
There are at least some mental properties that are neither reducible to nor supervenient upon physical properties.
qualia
These are (1) phenomenal properties of mental states which are (2) intrinsic and non-intentional [i.e. non-representational]and are (3) introspectively accessible
functional role
substance dualism
Minds (mental substances) exist and are not identical to (and can exist independently from) bodies or to parts of bodies (physical substances).
functional duplicates
Two systems are __________________ (isomorphs) if the functional relations are the same (i.e. the same inputs would cause the same outputs, internally and externally).
functionalism
All mental states can be reduced to functional roles which can be multiply realised
eliminative materialism
At least some of those mental states (phenomena, properties, processes) that are supposed to exist according to the common-sense folk-psychological theory of the mind do not exist.
folk-psychology
(1) The ‘ordinary’ understanding of the mind (one’s own mind and the minds of
others) which (2) involves the positing of the existence of ‘inner’ mental states/events with certain features and (3) is used by people to explain and predict human behaviour.
hard’ philosophical behaviourism
All propositions about mental states can be reduced without loss of meaning (i.e. analytically reduced) to propositions that exclusively use the language of physics to talk about bodily states / movements
mind-brain type identity theory
All mental states are identical to brain states (‘ontological’ reduction) although the concepts/terms ‘mental state’ and ‘brain state’ are not synonymous (so not an ‘analytic’ reduction).
physicalism
Everything (including the mental) is physical or supervenes upon the physical (this includes properties, events, objects and any substance(s) that exist).
self-refuting
If a claim/theory is _____________ then something about theory/claim means that the theory/claim itself is undermined/contradicted (e.g. the verification principle and eliminative materialism)
soft’ philosophical behaviourism
(At least some) propositions about mental states are (at least in part) propositions about behavioural dispositions (ie propositions that use ordinary language)
Super-(Super)-Spartan’ (Putnam)
Beings that (1) feels pain-qualia but (2) has the ability to successfully suppress all voluntary pain behavior (and, if a SSS, (3) does not even talk about pain)
intentional properties (intentionality)
A mental state has _____________ if is is about something, if it has an “intentional object”
Functionalism
Mental states can be reduced to (are identical to) functional roles which can be multiply realised.
multiple realisability of mental states
(vs MBTIT and for functionalism)
Many different types of thing (which need not be humans) can have exactly the same type of mental state. A single mental kind (property, state, event) can be realised / instantiated in many (perhaps even infinite) ways.
multiple realisability of mental states
(vs philosophical behaviourism)
A single mental kind (property, state, event) can be identified with multiple (perhaps infinite) behaviours.