Middle Ear Implants Flashcards
(54 cards)
What are the different types of devices?
Acoustic to acoustic (conventional hearing aids)
Acoustic to mechanical vibration (ME implant, bone conduction hearing devices)
Acoustic to electric (cochlear implant, brainstem implant)
What are middle ear implants?
A surgically implanted component that is coupled to a structure in the ME and that mechanically oscillates to facilitate stimulation of the cochlea
What experiment played a pivotal role in ME implant development?
Wilska’s experiment in 1935
Placed iron particles on the TM and using an electromagnetic coil inside an earphone
Demonstrated the generation of a magnetic field that caused the iron particles to vibrate
This vibration was then transmitted to the TM, facilitating sound transmission to the inner ear
Was progress in ME implants limited from 1935 to 1959?
Yes, until Rutschmann’s work in 1959
Documented the stimulation of the ossicles using alternating magnetic fields on a magnet attached to the TM
Did further advancements in ME implants occur in the 1970s?
Yes, this marked the introduction of surgically implantable devices for the ME
Who made the first working ME implant system?
G.R. Ball
Did limitations in the available hearing aid technology lead to the emergence of MEI hearing devices in the 1990s and early 2000s?
Yes, it was presented as a solution to overcome these limitations, particularly in addressing high-frequency hearing loss
What are some limitations of conventional hearing aids?
Placement loss
Social stigma
Discomfort
Maintenance
Occlusion
Feedback
Wax problems
Poor sound quality
Distortion
Insufficient gain
What was the first MEI hearing device that received FDA approval for commercial use?
Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge in 2000
What were the two components of the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge?
An external sound processor with a microphone that captured sound, processed it digitally, and transmitted it to an external coil via electromagnetic induction
An internal coil which processed the signal and delivered it to a vibrating mechanical component that was coupled to the ossicular chain
What are the theoretical advantages of MEI?
Greater gain (increased gain prior to acoustic feedback, although some feedback risk remains due to enhanced mechanical oscillation)
Avoidance of the occlusion effect (crucial for individuals with external otitis or skin allergies, unaffected by cerumen-related problems; some MEI require the use of a component in the external auditory meatus)
Improved comfort (especially with fully implanted options)
Higher-fidelity sound (sound with less distortion compared to air conduction aids)
Aesthetic appeal (especially if the components are implanted under the skin)
Continuous wear (fully implanted devices allow 24/7 wear during daily activities, including showering and sleeping)
What are the theoretical disadvantages of MEIs?
Surgical procedure (required 1-2 hours under general anesthesia with risks like facial nerve injury and infection; complication rates are generally low)
Cost and insurance (higher costs compared to traditional aids, not typically covered by health insurance)
Hearing implications (some devices involve disarticulation of the ossicular chain, resulting in max conductive hearing loss when inactive)
MRI compatibility (most devices contain magnets, prohibiting MRI without implant removal; some exceptions with Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge)
Verification challenges (don’t produce acoustic output in the ear canal, making traditional REM measurements unfeasible for verifying the appropriateness of gain/output)
What are FDA approved indications for MEI?
18+ years old with SNHL
Moderate to moderately severe hearing loss with reasonably good open-set word recognition capacity (>60%) in optimal conditions
Individuals with lower WRS scores may not experience significant improvement in hearing performance with MEI
Hearing loss should ideally be stable
Normal ME anatomy and function without infection
Prior experience with hearing aids
*Off-label recommendations may be made when medically justified, regardless of FDA approved indications
Are patients with CHL considered to be poor candidates for MEI?
Yes, especially in the cases of chronic middle ear effusion
Some adults may be considered for MEI if the middle ear is aerated and free of chronic effusion or cholesteatoma
Some MEIs can bypass the ossicles by coupling the oscillating transducer to the round window, offering direct stimulation of the cochlea (ideal for conditions like otosclerosis or other ossicular chain pathologies)
What is done during the pre-op assessment for MEI?
Air and bone conduction pure tone audiometry at octave and interoctave frequencies (250 to 8000 Hz)
Evaluation of ME function (tymps, acoustic reflexes, and wideband reflectance)
A trial with conventional air-conduction hearing aids
Real ear probe tube measurements to ensure optimal hearing aid output matches evidence based prescriptive targets
Aided word recognition assessment at speech levels consistent with speech encountered in daily listening activities (60-65 dB SPL and 50 dB SPL)
Thorough medical evaluation by otologist to meet criteria for MEI consideration (includes CT scan to assess ME anatomy and surgical planning)
Some otologists may order a pre-op MRI to assess the CNS due to complications with MRI interpretation after MEI surgery
Are audiologists responsible for activation and monitoring of MEI?
Yes
Device activation occurs weeks post-surgery
Audiologists should conduct otoscopy at each session to monitor the implant site for signs of inflammation or discomfort
How are MEI programmed?
Using proprietary software and tools provided by the manufacturer
How are MEI verified?
No standardized verification exists, standard real ear measures are not applicable
Verification relies on behavioral and functional assessments to ensure that recipients receive adequate benefit (sound field detection thresholds for warbled tones, aided monosyllabic word recognition in the sound field at a presentation of 50 or 60 dBA, sentence recognition in noise such as the QuickSIN, and standardized questionnaires like the APHAB or the COSI)
Are the number of recipients of MEI available?
No, but numbers are expected to be lower than those for CIs, largely due to differences in insurance coverage
Are the theoretical benefits claimed by early developers of MEI still evident today?
No
Advances in digital hearing aid technology have addressed many of the limitations that existed almost 20 years ago and have allowed for satisfactory hearing performance for most persons with mild to severe SNHL
Advances in CI and hybrid technology, along with expanded criteria, allowed individuals who are unable to achieve satisfactory performance with conventional hearing aids to consider CI as an alternative
Why do we still use MEI?
A typical recipient is one who strongly prefers a totally implantable (or partially) hearing devices for cosmetic or lifestyle reasons
Fit - discomfort, otitis external, occlusion effect, poor retention
Use - limited vision, dexterity, self-efficacy, lost devices, frequent battery changes
Lifestyle - removal for sleep, water wear, athletic endeavors with heavy perspiration
They may be medically necessary for persons who tolerate the presence of a hearing aid in or on the external ear (external otitis, excessive cerumen, etc.)
Although rare, it may be the ideal solution for those unsatisfied with the performance obtained with air-conduction hearing aids and does not have enough loss to warrant CI
What are the clinical outcomes for MEI?
Studies show that they provide better hearing than unaided conditions
Performance in speech recognition (quiet and noise) and aided thresholds is typically comparable to conventional air conduction hearing aids
Many users report high satisfaction and functional benefit even if audiometric outcomes are similar to conventional aids
What are the different types of transducers for MEI?
Piezoelectric
Electromagnetic
Electromechanical
What is piezoelectric?
These materials possess a unique property when they come in contact with electricity (they oscillate when subjected to electricity and generate electrical voltage when physically displaced)
When coupled to the ME, these materials deliver mechanical energy, converting sound-induced vibrations into electrical signals for processing
The intensity and frequency of an electrical signal generated by piezoelectric material is essentially proportional to the intensity and frequency of the driving force
No external power source is required and they have relatively robust stability and durability
They may not provide enough amplification for those with moderate to sever hearing loss due to their limited output and narrow bandwidth