midterm 1 Flashcards
(42 cards)
Norms
Socially acceptable ideals/rules
Ex: the way you behave at a grocery store or fast food restaurant (lines, etiquette)
Deviance
Any behavior that violates social norms
- positive deviance (climate change activists)
Social Norms
The way people are expected to behave in society or situations
- violating personal space ettiquette
Natural Attitude
Disengaging from normal routine when something interrupts it
(something deviant or out of the ordinary)
Stages of Learning
Observation
- Imitation (feedback loop)
- Blending in, being a part of something (feeling of belonging)
Feedback
- Breaching experiments
- Correction
Direct instruction
- Being informed of the expectation for a certain situation (told to be on time)
4 Elements of Social Deviance
- Socially Constructed
- Contextual
- Culturally Relative
- Changes over Time
Socially constructed
It only exists within a society, nothing is ‘naturally deviant’
- Consequences are associated
Contextual
Sometimes acceptable, sometimes unacceptable, depends
Culturally relative
Acceptable in some cultures, unacceptable in others
- Ex: greetings, personal space, tipping, dancing
Changes over time
Evolving
- Ex: seatbelts, smoking/vaping, tattoos, drinking and driving, phones
Attitudes
(or belief systems)
ex; flat earthers, leftists, rightists
Behaviors
People’s actions!
- Way they dress, act
- It is achieved (someone earns it, caused by something)
- Changing the label is difficult
Conditions
Something acquired from birth (biology, psychology or environment)
- Nothing was done to earn the label, it is hard to get ride of
Caveat
A conditional deviant status can be achieved
(when a person becomes very fat or thin)
Social Harmfulness Argument
People believe that deviance is only harmful behavior and should be controlled/prevented
Physical Argument for Social Harmfulness Argument
Deviance causes physical damage to the deviant, other people, or objects
- Does NOT account for positive deviance!!
- Ex: marijuana was said to provoke sudden insanity, murder, mental defect etc.
Social Reality Argument for Social Harmfulness Argument
It is harmful because it is “destroying the world”
- Shakes up the assumptions that make life orderly, understandable, and meaningful
4 Problems with the Social Harmfulness Argument about Deviance
- Not all deviance is harmful in the same way
- Some conduct labeled deviant is less harmful than that which is not
- Some deviance that’s harmful is celebrated and the perpetrator is held in high regard
- Ex; Highly aggressive individuals are celebrated, yet are problematic (youtubers who do pranks, hockey players that fight on the ice)
- We find said behaviors interesting because we can’t engage with them - Can’t deal with positive outcomes of deviance (Silver lining effect)
What is Crime?
Legal definition: what the criminal code/law proclaims it to be a crime as an act punishable by law (any act that contradicts criminal code)
-Always partial, no universal definition
Actus Reus
VS
Mens rea
Actus Reus: Culpable act
(Accused behavior caused event )
Mens rea: Guilty mind
(Simultaneously accompanied by certain state of mind)
Ethics
how we ‘ought’ to be (how we should behave)
Nuremberg Code
Established in 1948, stating that “The (a) voluntary (b) consent of the human subject is absolutely essential,” making it clear that subjects should give consent and that the benefits of research must outweigh the risks
10 Standards of the Nuremberg Code
- Volunteers freely consent to participate
- Researchers fully inform volunteers
- Risks associated with the study are reduced where possible
- Researchers are responsible to protect volunteers against harm
- Participants can withdraw at any time
- Stopping the study if adverse effects emerge
- Society should benefit from findings
- Research on humans, should be based on previous animal or other previous work
- A research study should never begin if there is a reason to believe that death or injury may result
Declaration of Helsinki
World Medical Association established recommendations guiding research involving human subjects
- Research protocols should be reviewed by an independent committee prior to initiation
- Informed consent from research participants is necessary
- Research should be conducted by medically/scientifically qualified individuals
- Risks should not exceed benefits