Midterm 1 Flashcards
(309 cards)
What is Fechner’s Law?
Fechner’s Law states that subjective percept (P) is proportional to the logarithm of the ratio between the physical intensity of a stimulus (S) and the absolute threshold (S₀), with a modality-specific constant (k). The equation is P = k * log(S/S₀).
“The way we feel changes in intensity depends on how big the change is compared to what we started with.”
Instead of feeling changes directly, we experience them on a curve—big jumps matter more at lower levels, and small changes are harder to notice at higher levels.
What is Plato’s Theory of Forms?
Plato’s Theory of Forms states that beyond the physical world lies a realm of perfect, immutable, and eternal “Forms” or “Ideas,” which are the true essence of all things. The physical objects we perceive are merely imperfect reflections of these ideal Forms.
How does Aristotle’s view of form and matter differ from Plato’s?
Plato believed in the existence of Forms (Ideas) as separate, perfect entities that exist independently from the physical world. For example, the idea of a “circle” exists as a perfect Form, and any physical circle is just an imperfect copy of that ideal Form.
Aristotle, on the other hand, rejected the idea that Forms exist independently. He argued that form and matter always exist together—you can’t have one without the other.
In Aristotle’s view:
- Matter = the physical substance something is made of (e.g., wood, clay).
- Form = the structure or organization of that matter (e.g., a table, a statue).
What is the main difference between rationalism and empiricism?
Rationalism asserts that knowledge is primarily gained through reason and logical thought, while empiricism argues that knowledge comes from sensory experience and observation.
What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?
- Inductive reasoning draws general conclusions from specific observations (e.g., “All swans seen so far are white, so all swans must be white”). The conclusion is probable but not certain.
- Deductive reasoning draws specific conclusions from general premises (e.g., “All mammals have lungs; a whale is a mammal; therefore, a whale has lungs”). The conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true.
Deductive reasoning starts with a hypothesis or general rule and applies it to specific cases. If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.
Inductive reasoning starts with observations and forms a general conclusion.
Harvey Specter is cross-examining a witness. He starts with general premises: “All employees sign NDAs. You were an employee. Therefore, you signed an NDA.” What type of reasoning is he using?
Deductive reasoning. He starts with a general principle and applies it to a specific case.
Shawn notices that every time Gus sneezes after eating from a specific food truck, it’s when they serve dishes containing peanuts. He concludes that Gus is allergic to peanuts. What type of reasoning is this?
Inductive reasoning. Shawn observes a pattern and makes a general conclusion based on specific experiences.
Patrick Jane is solving a case and assumes that the killer must be someone who had access to the victim’s home. He then systematically eliminates suspects who didn’t have access. Which philosophical method is he using?
Rationalism. He relies on logical deduction rather than sensory experience to eliminate suspects.
Michael Westen is tracking a target and notices that every time the man stops at a café, he sits at a table with a clear line of sight to the entrance. He concludes that the man is a paranoid ex-intelligence officer. What philosophical stance does this align with?
Empiricism. Michael is drawing conclusions based on sensory observation and past experiences.
Abed argues that every TV show follows a predictable formula, and based on this, he predicts what will happen in a new show before seeing any episodes. Is he using rationalism or empiricism?
Rationalism. He is using logic and patterns rather than direct sensory experience to form conclusions.
Rory is preparing for a debate and argues that a true democracy must allow free speech. She builds her argument using general principles rather than specific case studies. What method is she using?
Deductive reasoning. She is applying a general principle (free speech is necessary for democracy) to support her argument.
Mike Ross remembers that in every contract dispute case he has studied, the side with more documented evidence usually wins. He predicts that his current case will follow the same pattern. What type of reasoning is this?
Inductive reasoning. He is making a general prediction based on specific past observations.
Lisbon tells Jane that not everything is just logic—sometimes, experience and observation reveal the truth. If Jane argues that logical deduction is superior, whose view aligns with empiricism, and whose with rationalism?
- Lisbon aligns with empiricism (knowledge comes from experience).
- Jane aligns with rationalism (knowledge comes from logical deduction).
Michael tells Fiona that he doubts everything he sees because deception is everywhere. He claims the only thing he can be sure of is that he is thinking. Which philosopher does this sound like?
This perspective closely aligns with the philosophy of René Descartes, who famously doubted all external reality, considering the possibility that a powerful demon could be deceiving him. However, he concluded that the very act of doubting proved his own existence, leading to his famous statement: “I think, therefore I am.”
What is John Locke’s theory of simple and complex ideas?
Locke believed that sensory information enters the mind as “simple ideas” (e.g., “blue” or “triangular shape”). These simple ideas can then be combined to form “complex ideas” (e.g., “blue triangle”).
How did Titchener’s introspection method differ from Locke’s approach?
Titchener attempted to go in the opposite direction, breaking down complex ideas into their simpler elements through introspection.
What was David Hume’s view on causality?
David Hume’s view on causality is that we cannot logically prove that one event necessarily causes another. Instead, our belief in cause-and-effect relationships comes from habit and experience, not from logical certainty.
(e.g., the sun has always risen, so we expect it to rise again).
What are Immanuel Kant’s a priori structures?
Kant believed that certain concepts, such as space, time, and causality, exist independently of sensory input and structure how we experience the world.
What is the difference between noumenon and phenomenon in Kant’s philosophy?
The noumenon is the thing-in-itself, which exists independently of human perception, while the phenomenon is how we perceive that thing. According to Kant, we can only have direct knowledge of phenomena.
What are some reasons philosophers believed the mind could not be studied scientifically?
- The mind has no measurable physical substance.
- Inner observations cannot be separated and recombined at will.
- The act of introspection changes the content of the mind.
What was Ernst Heinrich Weber’s contribution to psychology?
Weber studied proprioception and the Just Noticeable Difference (JND), which refers to the smallest weight difference a person can perceive.
How did Gustav Fechner’s personal experiences influence his work?
After suffering severe eye damage from sun-gazing experiments and experiencing what he saw as a miraculous recovery, Fechner became deeply spiritual and developed an obsession with the relationship between mind and matter.
What is panpsychism, and how does it differ from dualism?
Panpsychism is the idea that everything material has a mental aspect, suggesting a unified reality with both physical and mental properties. This differs from dualism, which suggests that mind and matter can exist independently.
Shawn and Gus are trying to solve a case. Shawn insists on breaking it down into simple elements, like noticing that a suspect always wears blue and has a specific walk. He argues that by combining these elements, they can understand the suspect’s full personality. Which philosopher does this align with?
John Locke. His idea of simple and complex ideas suggests that perception starts with basic sensory elements that combine into more complex thoughts.