midterm Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

3 guiding principles of belmont report

A
  1. Respect for persons - informed consent and protection of vulnerable populations
  2. beneficence - do not harm. maximize benefits and minimize risk
  3. Justice - fair and equal treatment in bearing burdens and receiving benefits of research. Include diverse populations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

persons with diminished autonomy entitled to protection

A

children
mentally disabled
prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

informed consent process (respect for persons)

A

gives enough info to decide wether or not to participate
gives comprehension through understandable language and answering question
voluntariness free of coercion or influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IRB must consider

A

risk to subjects
benefits to subjects
importance of knowledge to be gained
informed consent process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IRB must report to federal agencies what?

A
  • Injuries to human subjects or unanticipated problems

* Serious or continuing noncompliance with regulations or IRB requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is consent?

A

consent must be informed, understood, and voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Office for Human Research Protection (OHRP)

A

oversees Assurances –US institutions as well as international institutions receiving DHHS funds for research
federally funded research cannot be conducted until assurance is re-instated
has authority to terminate or suspend institution’s research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Federal-Wide Assurance (FWA) aka assurance of compliance is needed before?

A

a federal grant or contract is awarded to institutions

FWA makes institution agree to federal regulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Federal-Wide Assurance (FWA) aka assurance of compliance is needed before?

A

a federal grant or contract is awarded to institutions

FWA makes institutions agree to apply federal regulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

IRB acts as?

A

federal government in conducting duty of supervising research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

IRB acts as?

A

federal government in conducting duty of supervising research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

research study with prisoners must be?

A

applicable to health concerns in prison setting like

hepatitis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

good clinical practice

A

protect participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

good clinical practice branches?

A

FDA 21 CFR
OHRP (DHHS) 45 CFR 46
International council for harmonisation (ICH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

state and local regulations general rule

A

federal laws must be followed if stricter than state regulations
whichever is stricter must be followed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

21 CFR FDA regulated research

A

regulates:
financial disclosure for drug development
IRB

17
Q

how long are study records maintained?

A

minimum of 2 years after FDA approval or discontinuation

3 yrs after completion of study for DHHS

18
Q

ICH

A

international board that sets standards for the pharmaceutical industry

19
Q

confidentiality certificate

A

protects information about subjects against a legal order to discover data
given by NIH and IRB tells you to get it

20
Q

levels of IRB protocol review

A

exempt - review protocols that are minimal risk. usually retrospective. IRB not required if subject cannot be identified. ONLY IRB decides if exemption applies or not
expedited - reviews protocols that are minimal risk and can be retrospective or prospective. having 3 members of IRB can give you permission instead of the full board. may not be allowed if subject ID poses risk of privacy protection. consent can be waived
full board - for research with greater than minimal risk

21
Q

levels of IRB review

A

exempt - reviews protocol that are minimal risk. usually retrospective. IRB not required if subject cannot be identified. ONLY IRB decides if exemption applies or not
expedited - review protocol that are minimal risk and can be retrospective or prospective. having 3 members of IRB can give you permission instead of the full board. may not be allowed if subject ID poses risk of privacy protection. consent can be waived
full board - for research with greater than minimal risk

22
Q

informed consent review lets subjects know about?

A
risks
purpose
benefits
disclosure
confidentiality
compensation
answers to questions
voluntariness
23
Q

protocol deviations

A

decrease credibility of data and affect licensing of drug

24
Q

adverse event

A

any deterioration in health status wether or not associated with drug must be reported
like hospitalization, a finding in PE, symptom,

25
adverse drug rxn
due to a drug must also be reported
26
unexpected adverse event
new event not listed on risk information in protocol or investigator brochure.
27
serious adverse events must be reported to IRB within?
24 hours
28
final rule
no research misconduct by fabrication, falsification or other practices that deviate from scientific community intentional flaw
29
what are the simple concepts that drive decision making when implementing clinical trials?
subject welfare data validity control of investigational product
30
Good Clinical Practice in US | FDA 21 CFR
Electronic documents informed consent Financial disclosure IRBs IND (investigational new drug) and NDA (new drug application) Biologics devices
31
Good Clinical Practice in US | OHRP (DHHS) 45 CFR 46
IRBs and informed consent Protection of pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, children Registration of IRB
32
Good Clinical Practice in US | ICH
International board that sets standards for pharmaceutical industry
33
Expected adverse event vs unexpected adverse event
expected adverse event - adverse experience/ risk information in sponsor protocol or investigator brochure unexpected adverse event - any adverse experience not constistent with risk info described in sponsor protocol or investigator brochure