Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

What are the steps to an inductive proof?

A

The first step is the basis step. You show that something holds of some minimal element (i.e. n = 0).

The second step is the induction step. It has two parts.

First is the induction hypothesis. Here, you assume that something holds for n = k.

Second, you prove that if it holds for n = k then it holds for n = k+1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an interpretation?

A

An interpretation of P is an assignment to each propositional symbol of P either T or F.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is semantic consequence?

A

A⊨B iff there is no interpretation of P for which A is true and B is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is syntactic consequence?

A

A formula A is a syntactic consequence in PS of a set R of formulas of P iff there is a derivation in PS of formula A from set R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a theorem? What is a metatheorem?

A

A formula is a theorem in PS just in case there is some proof of that formula.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a proof?

A

A proof is a finite sequence of one or more formulas of P, each which is either an axiom or an immediate consequence of two formulas preceding it.

*In a proof in PS, every formula is a theorem.

Every proof in PS is a derivation in PS of the last formula of the theorem it proves from the empty set, and also any formulas of P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the axiom schema of PS?

A

[PS1] A -> (B -> A)
[PS 2] (A -> (B -> C)) -> ((A -> B) -> (A -> C))
[PS 3] ( ~A -> ~B) -> (B -> A)

*Note, these aren’t axioms of P because ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ aren’t symbols of P. Things are axioms in P ‘in virtue of’ these schemata. Any wff of P of the form of the schema is an axiom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the rule of inference for PS?

A

If A and B are any formulas of P, then B is an immediate consequence in PS of the pair of formulas A and (A -> B). [Modus ponens]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is p-consistency?

A

A set of formulas, R, is p-consistent iff there is no formula A such that A is a syntactic consequence of R and ~A is a syntactic consequence of R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is logical validity?

A

A is a logically valid formula of P [⊨p] iff A is

true for every interpretation of P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is semantics?

A

Having to do with the interpretation of formal languages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is syntax?

A

Having to do with formal systems without regard to interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a formula? What is a wff?

A

A formula is a string of marks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a model? What is model theory?

A

A model of a formula of a language is an interpretation of the language for which the formula comes out true. Model theory is the theory of interpretations of formal languages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the continuum hypothesis?

A

There is no cardinal greater than aleph naught, and smaller than the power set of natural numbers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is disjunctive normal form?

A

A formula is in DNF iff it is a disjunction of conjunctions.

17
Q

What is TF-connective adequacy?

A

A set of TF connectives is adequate iff any truth function can be expressed by some formula or other in a formal language containing only those connectives.

18
Q

What is a derivation?

A

A string of formulas is a derivation in PS of a wff A from a set R of wffs of P iff (1) it is a finite, but not empty, string of formulas (2) the last formula in the string is A (3) either i. each formula in the string is an axiom ii. is an immediate consequence of two formulas preceding it iii. is a member of the set R.

19
Q

What is denumerability?

A

A set is denumerable iff there is a 1-1 correspondence between it and the set of natural numbers.

20
Q

What is simple consistency?

A

A formal system, S, is simply consistent iff there is no formula A in language S such that both A and ~A are theorems of S.

21
Q

What is a wff?

A

A well-formed formula is a formula (string of marks) created using formation rules and an alphabet.

22
Q

What is a subset?

A

A set x is a subset of a set y iff every member of x is also a member of y.

23
Q

What is a proper subset?

A

The proper subsets of a set are all its subsets othan than that set itself.

24
Q

What are the natural numbers?

A

0, 1, 2, 3…

25
Q

What are the integers?

A

-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3…

26
Q

What is a power set?

A

The set of all subsets of A is the power set of A.

27
Q

What is Cantor’s theorem?

A

The power set of a set always has a greater cardinality than the set itself.

28
Q

What are truth functions?

A

A truth function is a function whose domain is a set of sequences of truth values and whose range is a subset of the set of truth values. A truth function is a function whose arguments and values are truth values.

29
Q

What is ‘⊨’?

A

Semantic consequence.

30
Q

What are the rational numbers?

A

1, 1/2, 3/4, 2…

31
Q

What are the real numbers?

A

The continuum…

32
Q

What is proof theory?

A

Proof theory is the theory of formal systems that does not require any reference to interpretation (model theory).

33
Q

What is a metatheorem?

A

A metatheorem is a theorem (true statement) about some formal system in the metalanguage.

34
Q

What are rules of inference?

A

A set of transformation rules (also
called rules of inference) that determines which relations between formulas of L are relations of immediate consequence in S. (Intuitively, the transformation rules license the derivation of some formulas from others.)

35
Q

OTHER WORK:

A
  1. Show TF Adequacy.
  2. Semantic proof of simple consistency.
  3. Mathematical induction.
  4. 1:1 Correspondence.
  5. Decimal expansion.
  6. Proof of deduction theorem.