Midterm Flashcards

(38 cards)

0
Q

A legal term describing the ready visibility of objects that might be seized as evidence during a search by police in the absence of search warrant specifying the seizure of those objects.

A

Plain view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

An offense not yet completed. Also, an offense that consists of an action or conduct that is a step toward the intended commission of another offense.

A

Inchoate offense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement.

A

Entrapment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law.

A

Excuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An act in violation of the law. Also, a guilty act.

A

Actus Reus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The state of mind that accompanies a criminal act. Also, a guilty mind.

A

Mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A set of facts and circumstances that would induce a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that a specified person has committed a specified crime.

A

Probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Latin for “after the fact.”

A

Ex post facto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Acts that are regarded, by tradition and convention, as wring in themselves.

A

Mala in se

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Acts that are considered wrong only because there is a law against them.

A

Mala prohibits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The understanding, based on US Supreme Court precedent, that incriminating information must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial.

A

Exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The advisement of rights due criminal suspects by the police before questioning begins.

A

Miranda warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In a specific crime, one of the essential features of that crime, as specified by law or statute.

A

Elements of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A rule for determining insanity, which asks whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong.

A

M’Naghten rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense.

A

Double jeopardy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A warrant less search of an arrest individual conducted to ensure the safety of the arresting officer. Because individuals placed under arrest may be in possession of weapons, courts have recognized the need for arresting officers to protect themselves by conducting an immediate search if arrestees without obtaining a warrant.

A

Search incident to an arrest

16
Q

The right against unreasonable searches and seizures.

17
Q

The right against arrest without probable cause.

18
Q

The right against self-incrimination.

19
Q

The right against “double jeopardy”

20
Q

The right to due process of law

A

Fifth, sixth, fourteenth

21
Q

The right to a speedy trial

22
Q

The right to a jury trial

23
Q

The right to know the charges

24
The right to cross-examine witnesses
Sixth
25
The right to a lawyer
Sixth
26
The right to compel witnesses on one's behalf
Sixth
27
Is a statement or contention by the defendant stating that he or she could not have committed the crime in question because he or she was somewhere else at the time of the crime.
Alibi
28
Self-defense, defense of others, defense of home and property, necessity, consent, resisting unlawful arrest
Justification
29
Makes the claim that it was necessary to inflict harm on another to ensure one's own safety in the face of near certain injury death.
Self-defense
30
You may use reasonable force to defend others who are or who appear to be in imminent danger.
Defense of others
31
Most jurisdictions allow for the use of reasonable, non-deadly force in defense of one's property.
Defense of home and property
32
One can sometimes violate the law when the purpose of the action is to prevent even greater harm.
Necessity
33
If harm comes to an individual after she agreed to participate in the activity.
Consent
34
A person has the right to resist arrest if the arrest is unlawful
Resisting unlawful arrest
35
Defendants admit to committing the offense, but believe that they should not be held criminally responsible because of some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act.
Excuses
36
Defendants claim that they were in some way discriminated against in the justice process or that some important aspect of official procedure was not properly followed in the investigation or prosecution of the crime charged
Procedural defenses
37
Is a legal definition not a medical one.
Insanity