Midterm 3 Flashcards
(125 cards)
Key principles of effective treatment per NIH
●Addiction is a complex but treatable disease that affects brain function and behavior.
●No single treatment is right for everyone.
●People need to have quick access to treatment.
●Effective treatment addresses all of the patient’s needs, not just his or her drug use.
●Staying in treatment long enough is critical.
●Counseling and other behavioral therapies are the most commonly used treatment.
●Medications are often an important part of treatment, especially when combined with
behavioral therapies.
●Treatment plans must be reviewed often and modified to fit the patient’s changing needs.
●Treatment should address other possible mental disorders.
●Medically assisted detoxification is only the first stage of treatment.
●Treatment doesn’t need to be voluntary to be effective.
●Drug use during treatment must be monitored continuously.
●Treatment programs should test patients for HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases as well as teach them about steps they can take to reduce
their risk of these illnesses.
What are we treating?
●substance abuse
●other mental health issues
●other physical health issues
What type of treatment?
●medication
●therapy (CBT, DBT, MI, Family based therapy, etc)
Treatment does not reach everyone
●Less than 10% of adolescents with alcohol or drug
problems receive treatment (SAMHSA, 2007)
●94% of people aged 12 or older with a substance use disorder did not receive any treatment in 2021
Need for treatment in past year 2023
●12 or young? 19.1
●12-17: 11.2
●18-25: 28.7
●26 or older: 18.6
Internal barriers to treatment
●Stigma (other ppl opinion or our own opinion)
●Psychological reasons (e.g., depression)
●Personal beliefs
●Lack of problem recognition
●Attitudes about abuse
●Attitudes about treatment
Public opinion
●80% dont want drug addict
●61% dont want heavy drinker
●34% don’t want homosexual
●10% dont want immigrant
●24% dont want someone with AIDS
External Barriers to treatment
●Financial reasons (cost)
●Time conflicts
●Logistical reasons
●Limited treatment options, availability and accessibility
●Lack of knowledge, understanding about options
●Enforced treatment
●Accessibility of drugs
Does treatment work?
●getting treatment is better than no treatment
●no evidence of treatment setting, length, intensity, types of populations, or types of adolescents for settings
Developmental considerations for treatment
●Consider brain development
●Possibility to weigh pros/cons
●Adolescents’ need for independence, setting own goals, and control over their life
●Immediate rewards
●Limited life experience, different outlook in life, limited
consequences
●Strength of peers
●Realistic goals and approach
●Labeling
●Address at adolescents’ level
●Flexibility
●Confidentiality
Treatment in context of Comorbidity
●We should be discussing substance use with our teens regardless of extend of use or impairment
●●No use
●●Experimentation
●●Abuse
●Flexible treatment plans to meet the needs of the individual pt and their unique presentation
●Do we need a substance specific treatment or standard care with substance use adjunct?
●We must ID and treat the co-morbidities: psychiatric, neuropsychological
and school based struggles
12-17 with substance use disorder and depressive episode
●29% no treatment
●21% with both treatment
●48% with mental health treatment
●1.2% with substance treatment only
Harm Reduction
●public health approach (minimize problems associated with use)
●lots of treatments fall under this approach
Safe Injection Sites
●opened in 2003 (vancouver)
●Operated by Vancouver Coastal Health and the Portland Hotel Society.
●September 2003 and July 2008, operated under a special exemption of Section 56 of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act
●Allowed individuals to use on sight without prosecution
●A constitutional challenge was heard by the Supreme Court of British Columbia to keep Insite open.
●Court ruled that laws prohibiting possession/trafficking of drugs were unconstitutional because they denied drug users
access to Insite’s health services.
●Insite currently operates under a constitutional exception to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
●Often a gateway to treatment
Insite 2017 user statistics
●175,464 visits by 7,301 unique individuals
●537 visits on average per day to the needle exchange service
●An average of 415 injection room visits daily
●2,151 overdose interventions with no fatalities
●3708 clinical treatment interventions (wound care and pregnancy test)
●Principle substances reported were heroin (64% of instances), methamphetamine (25%) and cocaine (6%)
●28% participants women; 18% Indigenous
●InSite’s operational budget was $500,000 (provided by Health Canada)
●BC Ministry of health contributed $1,200,000 to renovate the site and cover operating costs
Insite stats
●Over 3.6 million clients have injected illicit drugs under supervision by nurses at Insite since 2003.
●There have been 48,798 clinical treatment visits and 6,440 overdose interventions without any deaths.
●They connect clients with needed services
●Referrals to other social and health service agencies
●Vast majority for detox and addiction treatment.
●Admissions from Insite into Onsite, the adjoining detox treatment facility
●Fscal year 2017/18 443 clients accessed Onsite, the adjoining detox treatment facility, with an average stay of 11 days.
●Among clients, 95% or greater rated the facility’s services as excellent or good, and its staff as reliable, respectful, and trustworthy
●In 2010, 76% of residents expressed support for the facility
Insite effectiveness
●Decreased
●Needle Sharing and reuse of syringes
●Fewer people injecting in public
●Increased referrals to services
●Decreased publicly discarded syringes
●No increase in police reports of drug dealing or crime; no observed increase in new initiate into drug use
●When look at decreased needle sharing, increased use of safe injection practices and increased referral to methadone
maintenance treatment.
●Incremental net savings was more than $18 million
●Number of life-years gained 1,175
E-cig and health controversy: Pro
●Serves as tobacco harm reduction – better than the alternative
●May help with smoking cessation, but does not reduce cravings
●E-smoke contains just 5 chemicals; tobacco smoke contains 9,000 (lower toxicants than tobacco)
●Vapor is close to regular water vapor compared to tobacco smoke = no significant risk especially to bystanders
●E-cigarettes have much lower risk of lung cancer, other cancers, lung disease, & heart disease than regular cigarettes → saves tens of thousands of lives a year
●Low to no nicotine delivery, especially if not used extensively
E-cigs and health controversy: cons
●Detectable levels of carcinogens
●Quality control process when manufacturing the e-cigs
is inconsistent or non-existent
●Some e-cigs are labeled as having no nicotine, but actually have low levels of nicotine
●Nicotine levels vary based on the cartridge and amount may not actually match what is listed on the box
●Other harmful chemicals and tobacco-specific impurities are found
●E-cigs are only slightly better at helping people quit than other NRT products (e.g., gum)
●2014 CDC Study examined the total number of calls to poison centers for e-cigs
●Sept 2010: 0.3%
●Feb 2014: 42%
●42% involved people age 20 and older
●Most common complaints: vomiting, nausea & eye irritation
E-cigs (and teens)
●Marketed aggressively to young people
●Legacy found that e-cigarette ads reached 29.3 million teens and young adults from 1/2013-11/2013 (including 58% of 12-17 year olds)
●Flavors to entice (bubble gum, pina colada, cherry crush, chocolate)
●Other factors to consider:
●●Product placement in movies or entertainment
●●Celebrity endorsement or promotion
●●Re-normalization of smoking and de-stigmatizing
Are E-cigs beings used to reduce harm in teens?
●76% of the teens also smoked regular cigarettes
●Current e-cigarette use was negatively associated with
abstinence over 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
●teens are not using e-cigs as tobacco replacement, but in addition to cigarettes
●if adolescents smokes e-cigs, they were more likely to smoke conventional cigarettes and to smoke more heavily
Multidimensional Family Therapy
●Comprehensive outpatient family-based treatment
●Multiple domains: youth, parents, other family members, social network
●Developed for adolescents with substance use and related
behavioral/emotional problems
●Delivered in the home or community
●Implemented since 1985
●Delivered throughout the US and internationally
●Diverse ethnic and SES backgrounds
●Variety of contexts: Master’s level therapists, case managers
MDFT Overview
●12 – 16 weeks given weekly or twice weekly
●Manually-driven, with assessment and treatment in keys areas of social interaction
●Therapists work as intensive case managers to help the family receive needed services
●Housing, job training, income assistance, treatment for parents
MDFT Goals
●Help adolescent develop more effective coping and problem solving skills
●Help family improve interpersonal functioning as a protective factor
●Decrease emotional distance
●Encourage parent positive reinforcement
●need to teach how to praise and how to accept praise