Midterm GED Flashcards
(39 cards)
Mearsheimer
Post-CW LIO doomed to fail due to economic inequality, internal sovereignty/national identity crises, and failed interventions
Borzel & Zurn
LIO 1: Multilateralism
LIO 2: Post national liberalism
Outcomes: strengthened LIO, weakened LIO or re-emergence of nationalism
Lake, Martin & Risse
Challenges to LIO: populism, nationalism and anti-globalism
Sources of resilience: conflict reduction, economic benefits, institutionalization, legitimacy
Cooper & Heine
Modern diplomacy: more actors (NGOs, MNCs, IGOs), blurred lines between domestic and foreign policy
new types of diplomacy
McConnell & Woon
China’s diplomatic strategy: major country diplomacy balancing heirarchy and equality, BRI & Win-Win model economic partnerships v. geopolitical influence
Cheng & Zeng
DSR is a political slogan and moves from the BRI’s physical infrastructure to digital (AI, data centers) , not a fully coherent strategy
Hegemonic Stability Theory
a hegemony is required to maintain global order
Liberal International Order (LIO)
An international order based on liberal principles such as democracy, free trade, and international institutions
Challenges to LIO (Internal)
declining US power, legitimacy crises, inequality, nationalism, populism, erosion of democratic norms
Challenges to LIO (External)
rise of China and Russia as revisionist power, climate change, COVID-19, technological disruptions
China in the global order
supports economic globalization but resists universal HR norms, uses economic and military power to shape global institutions
Outcome of the changing LIO (China)
- integrate into a reformed LIO
- create a parallel order challenging Western norms
- push for changes in the existing order rather than overthrow it
Contemporary Challenges in Diplomacy
- new diplomatic levels
- expanded actors (hierarchies to networks)
Club v Network
Club: exclusive, state-led, elite driven negotiations
Network: complexity across multiple stakeholders, increased democratizations, technology and multilateralism play key roles
Role of NGOs in Global Governance
- Agenda setting
- International standard setting
- Decision-making
- Monitoring and implementation
* opportunities in UN conferences to shape global priorities
PD 2.0 & the Digital Age
social media transformed diplomacy, controlling narratives and managing misinformation, allow states to shape global events
Mao Zedong
1st gen, revolutionary diplomacy leaning towards Soviets, ideological radicalization following the Sino-soviet split, rapprochement with the US
Deng Xiaoping
2nd gen, shift to development focused diplomacy, open-door policy, non-alignment, economic modernization, national interests over ideology
Jiang Zemin & Hu Jintao
3rd & 4th gen, reassurance diplomacy to counter external hostility, engaged in multilateralism, arms control treaties, expansion of diplomacy beyond MFA
Xi Jinping
5th gen, more proactive global role, assertion of core interests (south and east china seas), centralization of power, hierarchical relations
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
represents China’s growing influence, though its execution remains complex, no coherent implementation plan, involved multiple actors (gov’t agencies, state owned enterprises, provincial)
Thick v. Thin
Strong institutions v. Limited or light institutionalization
Bounded v Unbounded
Restricted group of members v. Most states globally
Realist Orders
driven by security competition and power politics, arise in bipolar or multipolar worlds