Milgram Flashcards
(49 cards)
What is the background of Milgram’s research?
Milgram was Jewish
Intrigued by Asch’s studies
Wanted to explore scientific underlying of psychological mechanisms behind destructive obedience
Wanted to take his experiment to Germany
What is the way of getting pp of Milgram’s experiment?
PP responded to advertisements and mail shots asking for volunteers to take part in scientific research at Yale
What are the sample?
Diverse
Range of ages and occupations
Mainly male
n=40 but later tested 1000
What is the procedure?
Fake draw of sticks to decide who plays role of learner and who teacher (image)
‘Shock generator’ machine and sample shock (45v) – based
on ‘aggression machine’ invented by Buss (1961)
Read out word pairs and then test learner’s memory for them
and punish each error with a shock (diagram)
Increase intensity of shock upon each error (15v each time,
rising from 15 to 450)
If participant became reluctant to continue, then the experimenter used a script
What are the basic dependent measures?
Max voltage participants willing to shock to
Verbal scripts
Observation of video footage
Debrief interview materials
What are the basic findings of Milgram?
Students, behavioural scientists and laypersons asked to predict – they all said nobody would continue once the learner protested
In the pilot study all went to 450V
The mean disobey voltage= 360V
65% never disobeyed at all and all went to 450V
No PP stopped before 300V
What was the script for 180V?
‘I can’t stand the pain’
What is the script at 270V?
A loud scream
What were the variations?
Proximity of the learner
Legitimacy of authority
Location
Touch
2 experimenters
What were the results when the experimenter learnt that the learner had a existing heart condition and who found this?
Obedience was 26/40
Elms 1995
What is the mean level of shock when the PP was left alone?
50V
What happened with 2 experimenters?
No-one continued due to arguing
What happened with the location?
48% fully obedient
What happens with touch?
30% obedient
What happened with legitimacy of authority?
Scientist replaced by layperson, 20% were fully obedient
What happened with the proximity of the learner decreasing?
93%
What happened wit the proximity of the authority reducing?
Orders by the phone, 20.5%
Who looked at cross-cultural evidence?
Miranda et al 1981
Kilham & Mann 1974
What were the PP + obedient max shock level in Miranda et al?
Spain, Students, over 90
What were the PP + obedient max shock level in Kilham & Mann?
Australia, male and female students, 40(M), 16(F)N
What were the reactions for Milgram?
PP sweated, trembled, stuttered, bit their lips, groaned, broke into fits of uncontrollable nervous laughter
What are the early explanations of Milgram?
Danger of fundamental attribution error
Power of the situation (My Lai Massacre)
Agentic shift
Nuremberg defense
Who looked at the theoretical alternatives?
Elms 1995
What did Elms 1995 find?
Milgram raised the possibility to dispositional factors, idiosyncratic motives, empathetic cues, denial and narrowing of the cog field= Milgram, 1962