Mill Flashcards
(24 cards)
liberal political philosophy
we need to set up political structures suited to managing the needs of free, independent agents who have equal rights
liberal definition
centre left leaning individuals
libertarianism
prioritisation of individual freedom, deep scepticism and hostility towards state coercion, close to anarchism, typically right wing and pro-capitalist
neoliberalism
an approach to political economy that prioritises the market as a means of organising society and enabling freedom
main idea in on liberty
protection against tyranny of opinion and feeling, against society imposing ideas which limit individuality
humboldt on the end of man
the highest and most harmonious development of his powers, this requires the individuality of power and development
mill on theoretical reason
wary of a priori reasoning, prefers induction which means all genuine knowledge is fallible and corrigible
mill on happiness
induction gives us plenty of evidence that humans desire happiness, general happiness is a good to the aggregate of all persons
mill against benthams utilitarianism
quality should be considered as well as quantity, better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied
fallibility
we learn through coming up with new ideas and making mistakes
utility definition
we need to pursue collective happiness, foster higher qualities ox experience/thought
human nature analogy
not a machine but a tree which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides
progression based on utilitarianism
mill regards utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions but it must be utility grounded in the interests of man as a progressive being
the harm principle
the only purpose for which power can be exercised over a member of society against his will is to prevent harm
how do we know what rights to follow?
locke etc suggest natural rights but mill rejects these, we can learn through experience what the best means of ensuring wellbeing are
mill on government
we need government as freedom must be limited or will harm eachother but its power must be restricted - cautiously favours socialism
mills argument for free speech
if all mankind agreed apart from one we are no more justified in silencing that one than the one would be in silencing mankind
mill on how free speech improves us
any doctrine should be considered, we have the capacity to improve, silencing opinions robs the human race of a chance to reaffirm the truth
avoidance of mistake argument for free speech
we may be wrong, our ideas need to be tested, this requires free speech
assumption of infallibility argument
if we state that something is definitely false we assume our own infallibility, we can only become certain through debate
necessity of error argument
even if an opinion was false it would be wrong to stifle it, stops opinion becoming dead dogma
freedom of actions compared to freedom of opinions
opinions lose their immunity when the circumstances in which they are expressed in a wrong/mischevious scenario
will truth triumph?
not straight away, when an opinion is true it may be extinguished once or twice but will eventually be trusted and believed
mill against hate speech
humans should use their higher faculties to distinguish the better from the worse etc they should not be used for degrading foolish opinions