Misleading information: EWT Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

Who are the key researchers for misleading information for EWT?

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some consequences of faulty EWT?

A
  • false accusations
  • criminals not found
  • guilt for witness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does this section focus on?

A

What people can remember

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two examples of misleading information?

A
  • leading questions
  • post-event discussion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does post-event discussion affect memory?

A
  • memory may be changed or contaminated through discussions with others and/or being questioned multiple times
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What effect may occur during post event discussion?

A

conformity effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is conformity effect?

A
  • Gabbert found that ppts encouraged to discuss an event before the individually recalling were more likely to make errors in their ability to recall
  • may reach an agreed idea upon what actually took place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is repeat interviewing?

A
  • comments from the interviewer become incorporated into their own recollection of events
  • the interviewer may use leading questions and alter the individuals memory for events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is eyewitness testimony?

A

Evidence supplied in court by people who witness a specific event/crime, relying on their memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was experiment 1 of Loftus and Palmer

A
  • investigate how information (leading questions) supplied after an event influences a witness’ memory of that event
  • 45 students split into 5 groups from UNI shown 7 clips of different car accidents
  • After each film they were asked a number of questions including one crucial question “How fast were the cars going when they— into each other”
  • Each group was given a verb to fill in the blank, these verbs were: smashed, bumped, hit and contacted
  • Ppts would estimate the speed the car was travelling at
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Findings of experiment 1

A

more intense verb the ppts scored a higher speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conclusions of experiment 1

A

estimated the speed was affected by the verb used. The verb implied information about the speed which affected the memory of the accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was experiment 2 of Loftus and Palmer?

A
  • Investigate whether leading questions cause information to be altered after it is stored
  • Ppts were split into 3 groups
  • All were shown same short film of car accident and as before asked the same questions about speed
  • A week later, ppts returned and asked ‘Did you see any broken glass?’ (there was no broken glass)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Findings of experiment 2

A

In the smashed conditions, ppts claimed to see glass in comparison to the ‘hit’ condtion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conclusions of experiment 2

A

leading questions did change the actual memory a ppt had for an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A03 - Supporting evidence

A
  • for example, Loftus investigated misleading questions
  • College students who visited Disneyland as children were asked to evaluate advertising material containing misleading information about bugs bunny (who is not a Disney character) or Ariel (not introduced at time of childhood)
  • Ppts assigned to bugs bunny or ariel were more likely to report shaking hands with them than the control group (no misleading information)
  • Suggests that misleading information is powerful and can create false memory
17
Q

A03 - Research by Loftus is generally inaccurate, thus unreliable. But also many researchers has said it lacks ecological validity

A
  • Lab experiments may not represent real life because people don’t take the experiment seriously and would not be emotionally stimulated as they would in a real life scenario.
  • Foster et al found that if ppts thought they were watching a real-life robbery, and also thought their answer would influence trial, their identification was more accurate
  • Yuille and Cutshall found witnesses to an armed robbery gave more accurate reports four months later despite given two misleading questions
  • Suggests that misleading information may have less influence on EWT, than Loftus research suggests
18
Q

A03 - Real life applications

A
  • research into EWT is that it has real life applications to the criminal justice system
  • Psychological research has been used to warn the justice system of problems with eyewitness identification evidence
  • Recent DNA cases have revealed the inaccuracy of eyewitness identification and confirmed research, that it was the largest single factor in contributing to convictions of innocent people
  • Therefore, this highlights the importance of EWT research and the influence it has in the justice system and help it become more accurate in convictions