Misleading information: EWT Flashcards
(18 cards)
Who are the key researchers for misleading information for EWT?
Loftus and Palmer
What are some consequences of faulty EWT?
- false accusations
- criminals not found
- guilt for witness
What does this section focus on?
What people can remember
What are the two examples of misleading information?
- leading questions
- post-event discussion
How does post-event discussion affect memory?
- memory may be changed or contaminated through discussions with others and/or being questioned multiple times
What effect may occur during post event discussion?
conformity effect
What is conformity effect?
- Gabbert found that ppts encouraged to discuss an event before the individually recalling were more likely to make errors in their ability to recall
- may reach an agreed idea upon what actually took place
What is repeat interviewing?
- comments from the interviewer become incorporated into their own recollection of events
- the interviewer may use leading questions and alter the individuals memory for events
What is eyewitness testimony?
Evidence supplied in court by people who witness a specific event/crime, relying on their memory
What was experiment 1 of Loftus and Palmer
- investigate how information (leading questions) supplied after an event influences a witness’ memory of that event
- 45 students split into 5 groups from UNI shown 7 clips of different car accidents
- After each film they were asked a number of questions including one crucial question “How fast were the cars going when they— into each other”
- Each group was given a verb to fill in the blank, these verbs were: smashed, bumped, hit and contacted
- Ppts would estimate the speed the car was travelling at
Findings of experiment 1
more intense verb the ppts scored a higher speed
Conclusions of experiment 1
estimated the speed was affected by the verb used. The verb implied information about the speed which affected the memory of the accident
What was experiment 2 of Loftus and Palmer?
- Investigate whether leading questions cause information to be altered after it is stored
- Ppts were split into 3 groups
- All were shown same short film of car accident and as before asked the same questions about speed
- A week later, ppts returned and asked ‘Did you see any broken glass?’ (there was no broken glass)
Findings of experiment 2
In the smashed conditions, ppts claimed to see glass in comparison to the ‘hit’ condtion
Conclusions of experiment 2
leading questions did change the actual memory a ppt had for an event
A03 - Supporting evidence
- for example, Loftus investigated misleading questions
- College students who visited Disneyland as children were asked to evaluate advertising material containing misleading information about bugs bunny (who is not a Disney character) or Ariel (not introduced at time of childhood)
- Ppts assigned to bugs bunny or ariel were more likely to report shaking hands with them than the control group (no misleading information)
- Suggests that misleading information is powerful and can create false memory
A03 - Research by Loftus is generally inaccurate, thus unreliable. But also many researchers has said it lacks ecological validity
- Lab experiments may not represent real life because people don’t take the experiment seriously and would not be emotionally stimulated as they would in a real life scenario.
- Foster et al found that if ppts thought they were watching a real-life robbery, and also thought their answer would influence trial, their identification was more accurate
- Yuille and Cutshall found witnesses to an armed robbery gave more accurate reports four months later despite given two misleading questions
- Suggests that misleading information may have less influence on EWT, than Loftus research suggests
A03 - Real life applications
- research into EWT is that it has real life applications to the criminal justice system
- Psychological research has been used to warn the justice system of problems with eyewitness identification evidence
- Recent DNA cases have revealed the inaccuracy of eyewitness identification and confirmed research, that it was the largest single factor in contributing to convictions of innocent people
- Therefore, this highlights the importance of EWT research and the influence it has in the justice system and help it become more accurate in convictions