Misrepresentation Flashcards

1
Q

What is actionable misrepresentation?

A

A false statement off act which induces a party to enter a contract (this happens before contract is formed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If there is misrepresentation what happens to the contract?

A

It becomes voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What governs misrepresentation?

A

Common law

Misrepresentation act 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the criteria to help establish misrepresentation?

A

A false statement of fact or law
Which is made before the contract is formed
And it must induce the claimant who relied upon it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a statement of law or fact NOT?

A

Statement of opinion
Sales talk/puffs
Statements of future intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case is relevant to statement of opinion?

A

Bissett v Wilkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Facts of Bissett v Wilkinson

A

C purchased land from D after D said it would suitable for 2000 sheep
After purchase C later found the land could not hold that many sheep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outcome of Bissett v Wilkinson

A

The court found that this was a statement of opinion rather than fact because D had no knowledge of sheep farming it was an opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case related to sales talk does not amount to a statement of fact

A

Dimmock v Hallet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Facts of Dimmock v Hallet

A

D described the land as ‘improbable and fertile’ during the sale of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outcome of Dimmock v Hallet

A

The courts described this as a puff rather than a representation, therefore it could not amount to a statement of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain how statements of future intention and misrepresentation…

A

The general rule is that it cannot be a fact if it is about the future as it has not happened yet
However, if someone has knowledge that it will happen then it can amount to a misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case is relevant to statements of future intention…

A

Edgington v Fitzmaurice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Facts of Edgington v Fitzmaurice

A

C was a shareholder in a business
He received a request for a loan from D to help grow the business
It was in fact to pay off his loans
C sought repayment of money on the grounds of misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outcome of Edgington v Fitzmaurice

A

It amounted to misrepresentation because it was an untrue intention as to the future of the money and what was going to happen to it
Therefore it was a misrepresentation and the money should be paid back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What format can misrepresentation make?

A

Writing
Orally
Conduct
NOT silence

17
Q

What case is relevant to the format of misrepresentation?

A

Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

18
Q

Facts of Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

A

Aprilla contracted the spice girls on May 6th 1998 to sponsor a concert tour
On May 29th 1998 Geri left the group

19
Q

Outcome of Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

A

Aprilla stated the contract was based on the representation they would all work together.
Because she left, there was a misrepresentation by conduct

20
Q

What case is related to the point that misrepresentation must be made before the contract is formed?

A

Attwood v Small

21
Q

Facts of Attwood v Small

A

C was purchasing a mine and was told exaggerated statements about its capacity by D
C got this checked but their expertise erroneously said they were correct
6 months later they found out it was wrong and sought to rescind the contract

22
Q

Outcome of Attwood v Small

A

Court held there has been no misrepresentation because they did not rely on the representation by the vendor
They relied on the verification of their agents

23
Q

What are the three types of misrepresentation?

A

Innocent
Negligent
Fraudulent

24
Q

What is innocent misrepresentation? What remedies are available?

A

When D genuinely believes the representation is true and has reasonable grounds for that belief
Remedy = recession or damages

25
What is negligent misrepresentation? Remedies?
D should know what they are doing will amount to a misrepresentation however they are ignorant (reword this) Recession/damages
26
What governs negligent misrepresentation?
Common law | Misrepresentation act
27
What does the misrepresentation act state about negligent misrepresentation?
Negligent misrepresentation is a statement without reasonable grounds for belief in its truth Burdens of proof is on D Contract is required special relationship is not required
28
Negligent misrepresentation under common law...
Burden of proof on claimant No contract required Special relationship is required
29
What case is relevant to negligent misrepresentation under common law?
Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners
30
Facts of Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners
C (an advertising agency) ask D (a bank) for a reference about one of their customers D said customer would be able to meet financial obligations Customer did not
31
Outcome of Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners
The statements could amount to negligent misinterpretation because they carelessly made a false statement that c relied upon
32
What is a special relationship
At least 1 party has some special relationship and they can tell the other party will rely on this info
33
What is fraudulent misrepresentation? Remedies?
Burden of proof lies in the claimant Lord Herschell defined it as 'knowing to be false, without belief it was true' Recession/damages
34
What case is relevant to fraudulent misrepresentation?
Derry v Peek
35
Facts of Derry v Peek
Lord Herschell defined fraudulent negligence as 'a statement knowing to be false, without belief it us true'
36
What are the restrictions to the availability of recession?
Affirmation: a party has implied they wish to continue with contract Laps of time: if too long it can be seen as affirmation Rights if third party: if 3rd party has gained bona fida rights property then it won't be available It is impossible e.g subject matter has changed Damages is more suitable remedy
37
What is recession? What type of remedy?
It is an equitable remedy which aims to put the parties the position they were in before the contract started