🍥 mod 5 - scientific investigations! Flashcards
(46 cards)
5.1.1
Who investigated peptic ulcers?
Barry Marshall & Robin Warren
5.1.1
What initiated the peptic ulcer investigation?
They had observed small, curved and spiral-like bacteria present in the stomachs of people suffering from ulcers and gastritis.
5.1.1
What was thought to be the cause of peptic ulcers?
- Lifestyle such as smoking
- Stress
5.1.1
What is the actual cause of peptic ulcers?
** From their investigation
Helicobacter Pylori (H. Pylori) damages the lining of the stomach and intestine
5.1.1
How did they carry out the peptic ulcer investigation? (Method)
- Studied Biopsies of people with ulcers
- Cultivated the bacteria in a lab
- Self experimentation (Marshall drank broth contaminated with H. Pylori)
5.1.1
Who investigated plant growth?
Van/Von Helmont
5.1.1
What initiated the plant growth investigation?
Von Helmont wanted to research how plants gain their mass (their growth)
5.1.1
What was thought to be the cause of plant growth?
Soil, plants absorbed nutrients and matter directly from it to grow
5.1.1
What did he observe for the cause of plant growth?
** From his experiment
The plant gained 74kg and the soil only lost 57 grams , so the plants weight gain was from the water
5.1.1
How did he carry out the plant growth investigation? (Method)
- Weighed soil beforehand
- Planted a Willow Tree in the dried soil for 5 years
- Watered it with only rainwater and distilled water
- Weighed it again after 5 years
Plant +74kg , Soil -57g
5.1.1
Who investigated microwaves?
Percy Spencer
5.1.1
What initiated the microwave investigation?
Spencer stood next to a magnetron which releases microwaves causing the chocolate in his pocket to melt. He then thought “Could radiowaves cook food?”
5.1.1
How did he carry out the microwaves investigation?
He pointed microwaves at different food items surrounded by a metal box
5.1.1
What did he observe from his microwave investigation?
Microwaves can cook food!
** This then lead to the construction of the first microwave :) **
5.1.1
What is correlation?
Extra: What’s the difference between correlation and causation :)
Correlation is how two variables change eachother / How they are connected.
** E.g: Smoking correlates with alcoholism, but doesn’t cause it **
5.1.1
What is causation?
Extra: What’s the difference between correlation and causation :)
Causation indicates that 1 event is the result of the occurence of another event.
** E.g: Hotter weather = More people getting sunburnt **
Random Q!
What is an inference?
the process of drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning
5.1.2 + 5.1.3
What is a hypothesis that Von Helmont may have had?
If there is water availability for a plant in soil then it will increase in mass because of water absorption from the soil.
** NOT from the soil itself!! **
** testing the conclusion of a previous investigation i think?? though i’m not sure :( **
5.1.2 + 5.1.3
What is a hypothesis that Barry Marshall and Robin Warren may have had?
If a patient has peptic ulcers, then H.Pylori will be present because the bacteria is the cause for stomach ulcers.
** finding relationships or patterns in identified phenomena**
5.1.2 + 5.1.3
What is a hypothesis that Percy Spencer may have had?
If food is in contact with microwaves then the food will cook because heat will be emitted
** utilising scientific knowledge and understanding to make more accurate predictions and develop new technologies**
5.1.4
How did Barry Marshall and Robin Warren deviate from traditional models of scientific methodology?
- They Self Experimented
- Working backwards
- They experimented before their understanding was actually developed / comprehensive
starting from Observation/Question > Report conclusion [look at pic]
https://learn.sasc.nsw.edu.au/courses/43219/discussion_topics/422331
5.1.4
How did Von Helmont deviate from traditional models of scientific methodology?
- Only had one sample and one trial, (No control, Not reliable)
- Didn’t have a clear hypothesis
- Bad Method, Bad Equipment
https://learn.sasc.nsw.edu.au/courses/43219/discussion_topics/422331
5.1.4
How did Percy Spencer deviate from traditional models of scientific methodology?
- He didn’t intend to exepriment on microwaves
- Did not have a hypothesis, just “What if..” approach
- He was more interested in applying his findings rather than trying to understand why it was happening
** Iterative approach, making modifications to his investigations impulsively (IDK :V)**
https://learn.sasc.nsw.edu.au/courses/43219/discussion_topics/422331
5.2.1
What is Eratosthenes’ objective and what did he observe?
To demonstrate that the earth was round and he wanted to produce an accurate world map.
He observed that during summer solstice, syene produced no shadows but in alexandria a stick casted a shadow therefore earth is curved coz if it wasnt then there would be no shadow.