models Flashcards

1
Q

define model

A

simplified or idealized representation of a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define statistical model

A

mathematical relationship between variables, that hold under specific assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

behaviourism view of cognitions

A

“black box”
input –> output, unknown what happens in the brain between the two

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive box and arrow models (and example)

A

models that describe the relationship between different mental processes → assumption that the mind operates like multi-staged information-processing machines

started simply but can be very complex

e.g. Broadbent (1985) levels of processing of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

studying cognitive models

A

manipulating input and observing output to figure out what occurs in between
e.g. gorilla video experiment about paying attention to the stimuli - why does it change when attention given to it - use Broadbent’s model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

formal cognitive models

A

aka computational models
a mathematical description of the relationship between mental processes
usually expressed through computer code
assumptions are explicit
often provides numerical predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

informal cognitive models

A

verbal description of the relationship between different cognitive procedures
often some assumptions are implicit
often provides only directional predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define simplification and abstraction

A

simplification = not going to describe all the info, only critical parts
abstraction = generation of general rules and concepts from specific info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

applying simplification and abstraction to models

A
  • need to balance simplification and abstraction in models
  • depending on what question is being asked or process is being conveyed
  • emphasis on certain elements that are the purpose of the model e.g. model train about how the wheels work doesn’t need complex engine
  • simple is not a criticism of a model → all models are simple → only bad if it is simple in what it is trying to express
  • all models are wrong due to simplification, but are useful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

predictions and or explanations in models

A

non-scientific explain after the fact - cannot provide falsifiable predictions (Karl Popper)
scientific models must produce predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

scientific models predictions

A

can be directional or numerical
directional = one thing is more/less than the other
numerical = use a data set and correlations to predict what would happen with a new data point e.g. find a person’s income and predict their happiness based on previous data –> can extrapolate current data
* numerical predictions can vary in levels of accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

theoretical vs statistical models explanations

A

theoretical always provide explanations for data found
goes beyond the statistical models - they only describe the relationship without explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hierarchy of research (5)

A

framework
theory
model
hypothesis
data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

hierarchy of research: framework

A

conceptual system that defines terms and provides control e.g. cognitive psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

hierarchy of research: theory and model

A

theory = scientific proposition that provides relations between phenomena e.g. early-selection theory
model = schematic representation of a theory e.g. Broadbent’s filter model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hierarchy of research: hypothesis and data

A

hypothesis = narrow testable statement

data = collected observations often as part of an experiment

17
Q

models: explanation without prediction

A

models which can predict group differences (very broad) but not individual cases

18
Q

models: prediction without explanation

A

e.g. can predict whether an individual will get Alzheimer’s even though Alzheimer’s isn’t fully understood yet
e.g. computer models using data to give prediction - more data = more predictive power –> like a “black box” as the operator doesn’t understand what the computer is doing to find this
all statistical models fit this - give data without explanation

19
Q

hierarchy of formal models (6)

A

framework
theory
specification
implementation
hypothesis
data

same as for research but model is split into specification and implementation

20
Q

formal models: specification

A

formal description of relations described by a theory e.g. formal model of symbolic representations

21
Q

formal models: implementation

A

specific instantiation of a specification e.g. computer program which can simulate and predict numerical outputs from an input

22
Q

advantages of formal models (3 - brief)

A

more accurate predictions
counter-intuitive predictions
explicit assumptions

23
Q

advantages of formal models: more accurate predictions

A
  • easier to reject bad models - see if predictions are unreasonable
  • select which experiments to perform - if two models give same prediction, that isn’t useful as we cannot tell which was actually correct - with numerical predictions (e.g. % rates) we can see which got closer
  • subtle form of hypothesis testing - how close model is to predicting actual result - not just general trend but closeness to specific number/data
  • prediction is more accurate - the model might still be bad and therefore prediction can be wrong even when accurate
24
Q

advantages of formal models: counter-intuitive predictions

A
  • clear description of predictions so when predictions seem wrong it is obvious
  • hard with informal to notice when counter-intuitive predictions are made
25
Q

advantages of formal models: explicit assumptions

A
  • reveal unanswered questions, flaws in reasoning, contradictory/unreasonable assumptions
  • can make assumptions transparent for others to see e.g. verbal models cannot show what occurs but formal can simulate this
26
Q

limitations of formal models [wont be tested on this]

A
  • requires expertise
  • transparency
  • best compared against other computational models, not against informal
  • numerical predictions can be premature
    changing the model takes time - this can limit progress
  • may seem to provide scientific validity even when it isn’t e.g. neural network models
  • making a model simulate a cognitive task does not teach us about cognition
27
Q

issue understanding the brain

A

can only sample small amount of activity from a small brain area

28
Q

break down of brain data to understand it (Marr) (3)

A
  1. computation → problem being solved
  2. algorithm → steps/rules to solve problem
  3. implementation → actual machinery

focus too much on any of these 3 is bad -> hyperfocus doesn’t allow for interactions between the 3 - creates non specific theories that might not match

29
Q

bottom-up approach to brain data

A

neuroscience and AI
implementation → rules → problem
example:
machinery of neural circuits → generate algorithm from these → what problems do these algorithms solve

30
Q

Marr (1982) view on approaches to brain data

A

understand algorithms better by understanding the nature of the problem being solved rather than examining the mechanism
therefore use top-down approach
focus on mechanics takes away from other parts - too small detail without context

31
Q

top-down approach to brain data

A

Marr’s view - and most cognitive psychologists
problem → rules → implementation

e.g.
problem to solve → what algorithms can solve this → how algorithms are implemented in neural circuits

32
Q

Epstein (2008) - core reading
* misconceptions with modelling (2)
* reasons for modelling (there are 16 total, 5 written here)

A

goal isn’t always prediction
theories don’t arise from and summarise data - they often precede and guide data collection instead

reasons:
guide data collection, explanations, raise new questions, illuminate core dynamics, suggest analogies

33
Q

Guest and Martin (2021) - core reading
* why is using models helpful
* what is an open theory

A

models are transparent in how conclusions are drawn –> forced to analyse information closely

open theories are developed explicitly and defined formally
* can recognise flaws in replication
* open theories are better to use for their transparency and what they can tell you about the theory being tested