module 1 Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

definition of epidemiology

A

the study of how much dis-ease occurs in groups and of the factors that determine differences in disease occurrence between 2 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what do epidemiologists do

A

measure the frequency of health and disease in different poppulations to find out the causes of poor health and how to improve it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

key difference in epidemiology

A

describe the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why do we age standardise

A

populations have different age structures that can cause confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is a cohort study

A

not random and occurs over time where relevant disease events are counted - longitudinal and observational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

cross sectional study

A

measure prevalence - measure outcome and exposure at the same time - can measure prevalence during incidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when do you use incidence vs prevalence

A

incidence - mortality and easy to measure - prevalence - hard to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how are cohort allocated

A

by measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

period prevalence

A

backwards and diagonal t but still prevalence as incidence only measures forward in time - eg asthma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

categorical vs numerical

A

yes. or no or greater or less than vs mean averaged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

epidemic vs pandemic

A

epidemic = occurrence of disease that is in excess of normal
pandemic = epidemic in multiple countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

high incidence and low prevalence

A

people die or get cured rapidly - eg cold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

low incidence high prevalence

A

eg bmi - cant measure over time but can in one point in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths and weakness of incidence

A

determined by disease risk in population - clean measure - over time - maintenance and allocation error - takes long

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

prevalence strengths and weakness

A

less info than incidence - dirty measure - easy to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ecological study

A

participants are countries - confounding as different factors are faced eg diet and outside influence

16
Q

difference between rct and cohort

A

randomly allocated to eg and cg

17
Q

benefits of rct

A

similar baseline qualities and comparison to measure effects of exposure - = chance of being assigned to eg or cg if study is big enough - often not though so smaller studies are combined - decreased confounding
ethicality - cant test a lot of things if it has shown harm - less participants as well - expensive - experimental

18
Q

double blind

A

neither participant or researcher knows the exposure - prevents subjective measures and placebo - researcher kept separate

19
Q

single blind

A

researcher knows

20
Q

error with rct

A

random sampling or random allocation - also maintenance over time

21
Q

rr vs rd

A

rr no units rd same as ego and cgo
rr = ego/cgo rd = ego-cgo
relative risk reduction = less than 1 and increase = more than 1
use rd instead of rr to measure disease risk and if cgo is small then benefit from treatment will be small

22
Q

ramboman - non random

A

recruitment
allocation - reduce this by meta analysis or strata
maintenance
blind objective measurement
analysis

23
Q

low response rate

A

bad rep of total pop

24
confounding
when factors other than exposure contribute to the outcome so study has bias
25
random error and how to reduce
extreme events due to chance - regression to the mean by repeating trials with extreme results
26
random sampling error
every sample will be different - smaller sample = less rep of pop = greater error
27
what is ci for
measure of range of random error in estimate of cgo ego rr and rd if only one study is done
28
example of ci
there is about 95% chance that the true value in a population lies within the 95% ci
29
if ci of cgo and ego do not overlap
stat sig difference
30
if ci of rr rd and no effect line dont overlap
stat sig diff
31
if large ci overlap between ego and cgo
study unable to determine if ego and cgo differ and so results are not stat diff as too much random error
32
systematic reviews and meta analysises
mainly in rct due to being small - lots of trials and keep good ones - reduce random error
33
reverse causality
which came first - exposure or outcome
34
to determine link between exposure and outcome
need sufficient studies in diverse settings and little random error non random error and confounding
35
tb
poverty, poor sanitation, overcrowding and reduced immunity