module 1 Flashcards
(36 cards)
definition of epidemiology
the study of how much dis-ease occurs in groups and of the factors that determine differences in disease occurrence between 2 groups
what do epidemiologists do
measure the frequency of health and disease in different poppulations to find out the causes of poor health and how to improve it
key difference in epidemiology
describe the population
why do we age standardise
populations have different age structures that can cause confounding
what is a cohort study
not random and occurs over time where relevant disease events are counted - longitudinal and observational
cross sectional study
measure prevalence - measure outcome and exposure at the same time - can measure prevalence during incidence
when do you use incidence vs prevalence
incidence - mortality and easy to measure - prevalence - hard to measure
how are cohort allocated
by measurement
period prevalence
backwards and diagonal t but still prevalence as incidence only measures forward in time - eg asthma
categorical vs numerical
yes. or no or greater or less than vs mean averaged
epidemic vs pandemic
epidemic = occurrence of disease that is in excess of normal
pandemic = epidemic in multiple countries
high incidence and low prevalence
people die or get cured rapidly - eg cold
low incidence high prevalence
eg bmi - cant measure over time but can in one point in time
strengths and weakness of incidence
determined by disease risk in population - clean measure - over time - maintenance and allocation error - takes long
prevalence strengths and weakness
less info than incidence - dirty measure - easy to measure
ecological study
participants are countries - confounding as different factors are faced eg diet and outside influence
difference between rct and cohort
randomly allocated to eg and cg
benefits of rct
similar baseline qualities and comparison to measure effects of exposure - = chance of being assigned to eg or cg if study is big enough - often not though so smaller studies are combined - decreased confounding
ethicality - cant test a lot of things if it has shown harm - less participants as well - expensive - experimental
double blind
neither participant or researcher knows the exposure - prevents subjective measures and placebo - researcher kept separate
single blind
researcher knows
error with rct
random sampling or random allocation - also maintenance over time
rr vs rd
rr no units rd same as ego and cgo
rr = ego/cgo rd = ego-cgo
relative risk reduction = less than 1 and increase = more than 1
use rd instead of rr to measure disease risk and if cgo is small then benefit from treatment will be small
ramboman - non random
recruitment
allocation - reduce this by meta analysis or strata
maintenance
blind objective measurement
analysis
low response rate
bad rep of total pop